IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v92y2007i4p408-422.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A tolerance interval based approach to address uncertainty for RAMS+C optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Martorell, S.
  • Sanchez, A.
  • Carlos, S.

Abstract

This paper proposes an approach based on tolerance intervals to address uncertainty for RAMS+C informed optimization of design and maintenance of safety-related systems using a combined Monte Carlo (MC) (simulation) and Genetic Algorithm (search) procedure. This approach is intended to keep control of the uncertainty effects on the decision criteria and reduce the computational effort in simulating RAMS+C using a MC procedure with simple random sampling. It exploits the advantages of order statistics to provide distribution free tolerance intervals for the RAMS+C estimation, which is based on the minimum number of runs necessary to guarantee a probability content or coverage with a confidence level. This approach has been implemented into a customization of the Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm introduced by the authors in a previous work. For validation purposes, a simple application example regarding the testing and maintenance optimization of the High-Pressure Injection System of a nuclear power plant is also provided, which considers the effect of the epistemic uncertainty associated with the equipment reliability characteristics on the optimal testing and maintenance policy. This example proves that the new approach can provide a robust, fast and powerful tool for RAMS+C informed multi-objective optimization of testing and maintenance under uncertainty in objective and constraints. It is shown that the approach proposed performs very favourably in the face of noise in the output (i.e. uncertainty) and it is able to find the optimum over a complicated, high-dimensional non-linear space in a tiny fraction of the time required for enumeration of the decision space. In addition, a sensitivity study on the number of generations versus the number of trials (i.e. simulation runs) shows that overall computational resources must be assigned preferably to evolving a larger number of generations instead of being more precise in the quantification of the RAMS+C attributes for a candidate solution, i.e. evolution is preferred to accuracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Martorell, S. & Sanchez, A. & Carlos, S., 2007. "A tolerance interval based approach to address uncertainty for RAMS+C optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(4), pages 408-422.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:92:y:2007:i:4:p:408-422
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2005.12.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832006000159
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2005.12.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Compare, M. & Martini, F. & Zio, E., 2015. "Genetic algorithms for condition-based maintenance optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(2), pages 611-623.
    2. Laggoune, Radouane & Chateauneuf, Alaa & Aissani, Djamil, 2010. "Impact of few failure data on the opportunistic replacement policy for multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 108-119.
    3. Martorell, S. & Martón, I. & Villamizar, M. & Sánchez, A.I. & Carlos, S., 2014. "Evaluation of risk impact of changes to Completion Times addressing model and parameter uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 190-201.
    4. Carlos García-Díaz, J. & Gozalvez-Zafrilla, J.M., 2012. "Uncertainty and sensitive analysis of environmental model for risk assessments: An industrial case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 16-22.
    5. Lv, Y. & Yan, X.D. & Sun, W. & Gao, Z.Y., 2015. "A risk-based method for planning of bus–subway corridor evacuation under hybrid uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 188-199.
    6. Sanchez, Ana & Carlos, Sofia & Martorell, Sebastian & Villanueva, Jose F., 2009. "Addressing imperfect maintenance modelling uncertainty in unavailability and cost based optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 22-32.
    7. J Riauke & L M Bartlett, 2008. "An offshore safety system optimization using an SPEA2-based approach," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 222(3), pages 271-282, September.
    8. Martorell, S. & Villamizar, M. & Martón, I. & Villanueva, J.F. & Carlos, S. & Sánchez, A.I., 2014. "Evaluation of risk impact of changes to surveillance requirements addressing model and parameter uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 153-165.
    9. Zhang, Sai & Du, Mengyu & Tong, Jiejuan & Li, Yan-Fu, 2019. "Multi-objective optimization of maintenance program in multi-unit nuclear power plant sites," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 532-548.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:92:y:2007:i:4:p:408-422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.