IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v208y2021ics0951832020308711.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Formalism and semantics of PyCATSHOO: A simulator of distributed stochastic hybrid automata

Author

Listed:
  • Desgeorges, Loïc
  • Piriou, Pierre-Yves
  • Lemattre, Thibault
  • Chraibi, Hassane

Abstract

This article lays the mathematical foundations of PyCATSHOO, a Model-Based Safety Analysis (MBSA) framework relying on distributed stochastic hybrid automata. This tool was initially developed for use cases where continuous evolution of physical variables or component failure rates matter to assess the dependability attributes. The modelling language has been designed in order to provide to the analyst the best expressiveness and ease of use. Nevertheless, although the structure and behaviour of a PyCATSHOO model have been informally described previously, they have never been formally established, which precludes its scientific acceptance and slows down its adoption by new users. To fill this lack, this article introduces formal definitions of the structure of PyCATSHOO models using set theory and of their operational semantics using inference rules (exactly 1 axiom and eight inference rules). These formal definitions are illustrated on a simple case study: the heated room. As a result, our proposing disambiguates the semantics of PyCATSHOO models, provides a formal specification of its input language and the core logic of its simulator engine and paves the way to the integration of model checking techniques in the PyCATSHOO framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Desgeorges, Loïc & Piriou, Pierre-Yves & Lemattre, Thibault & Chraibi, Hassane, 2021. "Formalism and semantics of PyCATSHOO: A simulator of distributed stochastic hybrid automata," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:208:y:2021:i:c:s0951832020308711
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832020308711
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107384?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Piriou, Pierre-Yves & Faure, Jean-Marc & Lesage, Jean-Jacques, 2017. "Generalized Boolean logic Driven Markov Processes: A powerful modeling framework for Model-Based Safety Analysis of dynamic repairable and reconfigurable systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 57-68.
    2. Boiteau, M. & Dutuit, Y. & Rauzy, A. & Signoret, J.-P., 2006. "The AltaRica data-flow language in use: modeling of production availability of a multi-state system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(7), pages 747-755.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheng, Ruijun & Cheng, Yu & Chen, Dewang & Song, Haifeng, 2021. "Online quantitative safety monitoring approach for unattended train operation system considering stochastic factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    2. Hu, Yunpeng & Peng, Qibo & Ni, Qing & Wu, Xinfeng & Ye, Dongming, 2023. "Event-based safety and reliability analysis integration in model-based space mission design," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    3. Park, Jong Woo & Lee, Seung Jun, 2022. "Simulation optimization framework for dynamic probabilistic safety assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    4. Vasilyev, A. & Andrews, J. & Dunnett, S.J. & Jackson, L.M., 2021. "Dynamic Reliability Assessment of PEM Fuel Cell Systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brissaud, Florent & Barros, Anne & Bérenguer, Christophe & Charpentier, Dominique, 2011. "Reliability analysis for new technology-based transmitters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 299-313.
    2. Pierre-Yves Piriou & Jean-Marc Faure & Jean-Jacques Lesage, 2022. "Finding the minimal cut sequences of dynamic, repairable, and reconfigurable systems from Generalized Boolean logic Driven Markov Process models," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(1), pages 209-220, February.
    3. Nejad, Hamed S. & Parhizkar, Tarannom & Mosleh, Ali, 2022. "Automatic generation of event sequence diagrams for guiding simulation based dynamic probabilistic risk assessment (SIMPRA) of complex systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    4. Zhang, Huilong & Innal, Fares & Dufour, François & Dutuit, Yves, 2014. "Piecewise Deterministic Markov Processes based approach applied to an offshore oil production system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 126-134.
    5. Taleb-Berrouane, Mohammed & Khan, Faisal & Amyotte, Paul, 2020. "Bayesian Stochastic Petri Nets (BSPN) - A new modelling tool for dynamic safety and reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    6. Michel Batteux & Tatiana Prosvirnova & Antoine Rauzy, 2017. "AltaRica 3.0 assertions: The whys and wherefores," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(6), pages 691-700, December.
    7. David, Pierre & Idasiak, Vincent & Kratz, Frédéric, 2010. "Reliability study of complex physical systems using SysML," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(4), pages 431-450.
    8. Liang, Qingzhu & Yang, Yinghao & Zhang, Hang & Peng, Changhong & Lu, Jianchao, 2022. "Analysis of simplification in Markov state-based models for reliability assessment of complex safety systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    9. Signoret, Jean-Pierre & Dutuit, Yves & Cacheux, Pierre-Joseph & Folleau, Cyrille & Collas, Stéphane & Thomas, Philippe, 2013. "Make your Petri nets understandable: Reliability block diagrams driven Petri nets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 61-75.
    10. Cherfi, Abraham & Leeman, Michel & Meurville, Florent & Rauzy, Antoine, 2014. "Modeling automotive safety mechanisms: A Markovian approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 42-49.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:208:y:2021:i:c:s0951832020308711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.