IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v165y2017icp422-430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling dependent competing failure processes with degradation-shock dependence

Author

Listed:
  • Fan, Mengfei
  • Zeng, Zhiguo
  • Zio, Enrico
  • Kang, Rui

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a new reliability model for dependent competing failure processes (DCFPs), which accounts for degradation-shock dependence. This is a type of dependence where random shock processes are influenced by degradation processes. The degradation-shock dependence is modeled by assuming that the intensity function of the nonhomogeneous Poisson process describing the random shock processes is dependent on the degradation processes. The dependence effect is modeled with reference to a classification of the random shocks in three “zones†according to their magnitudes, damage zone, fatal zone, and safety zone, with different effects on the system's failure behavior. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this type of dependence has not yet been considered in reliability models. Monte Carlo simulation is used to calculate the system reliability. A realistic application is presented with regards to the dependent failure behavior of a sliding spool, which is subject to two dependent competing failure processes, wear and clamping stagnation. It is shown that the developed model is capable of describing the dependent competing failure behaviors and their dependence.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan, Mengfei & Zeng, Zhiguo & Zio, Enrico & Kang, Rui, 2017. "Modeling dependent competing failure processes with degradation-shock dependence," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 422-430.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:165:y:2017:i:c:p:422-430
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2017.05.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832016301740
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2017.05.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Navarro, Jorge & Rychlik, Tomasz, 2010. "Comparisons and bounds for expected lifetimes of reliability systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 309-317, November.
    2. Caballé, N.C. & Castro, I.T. & Pérez, C.J. & Lanza-Gutiérrez, J.M., 2015. "A condition-based maintenance of a dependent degradation-threshold-shock model in a system with multiple degradation processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 98-109.
    3. Khac Tuan Huynh & Inma T. Castro & Anne Barros & Christophe Bérenguer, 2012. "Modeling age-based maintenance strategies with minimal repairs for systems subject to competing failure modes due to degradation and shocks," Post-Print hal-00790729, HAL.
    4. Khac Tuan Huynh & Anne Barros & Christophe Bérenguer & Inma T. Castro, 2011. "A periodic inspection and replacement policy for systems subject to competing failure modes due to degradation and traumatic events," Post-Print hal-00790728, HAL.
    5. Wang, Yujie & Xing, Liudong & Wang, Honggang & Levitin, Gregory, 2015. "Combinatorial analysis of body sensor networks subject to probabilistic competing failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 388-398.
    6. Yuan-Jian Yang & Weiwen Peng & Debiao Meng & Shun-Peng Zhu & Hong-Zhong Huang, 2014. "Reliability analysis of direct drive electrohydraulic servo valves based on a wear degradation process and individual differences," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(6), pages 621-630, December.
    7. Huynh, K.T. & Barros, A. & Bérenguer, C. & Castro, I.T., 2011. "A periodic inspection and replacement policy for systems subject to competing failure modes due to degradation and traumatic events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 497-508.
    8. Huynh, K.T. & Castro, I.T. & Barros, A. & Bérenguer, C., 2012. "Modeling age-based maintenance strategies with minimal repairs for systems subject to competing failure modes due to degradation and shocks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 140-151.
    9. Wang, Chaonan & Xing, Liudong & Levitin, Gregory, 2013. "Reliability analysis of multi-trigger binary systems subject to competing failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 9-17.
    10. Wang, Chaonan & Xing, Liudong & Levitin, Gregory, 2012. "Competing failure analysis in phased-mission systems with functional dependence in one of phases," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 90-99.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yujie & Xing, Liudong & Levitin, Gregory & Huang, Ning, 2018. "Probabilistic competing failure analysis in phased-mission systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 37-51.
    2. Wang, Chaonan & Xing, Liudong & Peng, Rui & Pan, Zhusheng, 2017. "Competing failure analysis in phased-mission systems with multiple functional dependence groups," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 24-33.
    3. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    4. Kong, Dejing & Qin, Chengwei & He, Yong & Cui, Lirong, 2017. "Sensor-based calibrations to improve reliability of systems subject to multiple dependent competing failure processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 101-113.
    5. N. C. Caballé & I. T. Castro, 2019. "Assessment of the maintenance cost and analysis of availability measures in a finite life cycle for a system subject to competing failures," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(1), pages 255-290, March.
    6. Ji Hwan Cha & Maxim Finkelstein & Gregory Levitin, 2017. "Bivariate preventive maintenance for repairable systems subject to random shocks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(6), pages 643-653, December.
    7. Shafiee, Mahmood & Finkelstein, Maxim & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2015. "An opportunistic condition-based maintenance policy for offshore wind turbine blades subjected to degradation and environmental shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 463-471.
    8. Cha, Ji Hwan & Finkelstein, Maxim & Levitin, Gregory, 2018. "Bivariate preventive maintenance of systems with lifetimes dependent on a random shock process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 122-134.
    9. Hongda Gao & Dejing Kong & Yixin Sun, 2022. "Reliability modeling and analysis for systems governed by multiple competing failures processes," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(2), pages 256-265, April.
    10. Huynh, K.T. & Grall, A. & Bérenguer, C., 2017. "Assessment of diagnostic and prognostic condition indices for efficient and robust maintenance decision-making of systems subject to stress corrosion cracking," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 237-254.
    11. Srivastav, Himanshu & Lundteigen, Mary Ann & Barros, Anne, 2021. "Introduction of degradation modeling in qualification of the novel subsea technology," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    12. Hai-Kun Wang & Yan-Feng Li & Yu Liu & Yuan-Jian Yang & Hong-Zhong Huang, 2015. "Remaining useful life estimation under degradation and shock damage," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(3), pages 200-208, June.
    13. Rafiee, Koosha & Feng, Qianmei & Coit, David W., 2017. "Reliability assessment of competing risks with generalized mixed shock models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 1-11.
    14. Mahmood Shafiee & Maxim Finkelstein, 2015. "A proactive group maintenance policy for continuously monitored deteriorating systems: Application to offshore wind turbines," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(5), pages 373-384, October.
    15. Wang, Yujie & Xing, Liudong & Wang, Honggang & Levitin, Gregory, 2015. "Combinatorial analysis of body sensor networks subject to probabilistic competing failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 388-398.
    16. Caballé, N.C. & Castro, I.T. & Pérez, C.J. & Lanza-Gutiérrez, J.M., 2015. "A condition-based maintenance of a dependent degradation-threshold-shock model in a system with multiple degradation processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 98-109.
    17. Shafiee, Mahmood & Finkelstein, Maxim, 2015. "An optimal age-based group maintenance policy for multi-unit degrading systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 230-238.
    18. Zou, Guang & Kolios, Athanasios, 2022. "Quantifying the value of negative inspection outcomes in fatigue maintenance planning: Cost reduction, risk mitigation and reliability growth," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    19. Meango, Toualith Jean-Marc & Ouali, Mohamed-Salah, 2020. "Failure interaction model based on extreme shock and Markov processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    20. Jingyi Liu & Yugang Zhang & Bifeng Song, 2019. "Reliability and maintenance modeling for competing failures with intermission considered," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(5), pages 898-907, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:165:y:2017:i:c:p:422-430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.