IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v140y2015icp191-199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of modeling formalisms for Safety Analyses: SAML and AltaRica

Author

Listed:
  • Lipaczewski, Michael
  • Ortmeier, Frank
  • Prosvirnova, Tatiana
  • Rauzy, Antoine
  • Struck, Simon

Abstract

Many states/transitions formalisms have been proposed in the literature to perform Safety Analyses. In this paper we compare two of them: SAML and AltaRica. These formalisms have been developed by different communities. Their “look-and-feel†are thus quite different. Yet, their underlying mathematical foundations are very similar: both of them rely on state automata. It is therefore of interest to study their ability to assess the reliability of systems, their respective advantages and drawbacks and to seek for opportunities of a cross fertilization.

Suggested Citation

  • Lipaczewski, Michael & Ortmeier, Frank & Prosvirnova, Tatiana & Rauzy, Antoine & Struck, Simon, 2015. "Comparison of modeling formalisms for Safety Analyses: SAML and AltaRica," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 191-199.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:140:y:2015:i:c:p:191-199
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832015001040
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David, Pierre & Idasiak, Vincent & Kratz, Frédéric, 2010. "Reliability study of complex physical systems using SysML," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(4), pages 431-450.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Penttinen, Jussi-Pekka & Niemi, Arto & Gutleber, Johannes & Koskinen, Kari T. & Coatanéa, Eric & Laitinen, Jouko, 2019. "An open modelling approach for availability and reliability of systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 387-399.
    2. Meng, Huixing & Kloul, Leïla & Rauzy, Antoine, 2018. "Modeling patterns for reliability assessment of safety instrumented systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 111-123.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cressent, Robin & David, Pierre & Idasiak, Vincent & Kratz, Frederic, 2013. "Designing the database for a reliability aware Model-Based System Engineering process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 171-182.
    2. Jenab, K. & Sarfaraz, A. & Dhillon, B.S. & Seyed Hosseini, S.M., 2012. "Dynamic MLD analysis with flow graphs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 80-85.
    3. Cuer, Romain & Piétrac, Laurent & Niel, Eric & Diallo, Saidou & Minoiu-Enache, Nicoleta & Dang-Van-Nhan, Christophe, 2018. "A formal framework for the safe design of the Autonomous Driving supervision," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 29-40.
    4. Hu, Yunpeng & Peng, Qibo & Ni, Qing & Wu, Xinfeng & Ye, Dongming, 2023. "Event-based safety and reliability analysis integration in model-based space mission design," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    5. Linlin Liu & Dongming Fan & Zili Wang & Dezhen Yang & Jingjing Cui & Xinrui Ma & Yi Ren, 2019. "Enhanced GO methodology to support failure mode, effects and criticality analysis," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 1451-1468, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:140:y:2015:i:c:p:191-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.