IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v79y2013icp21-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer understanding of product lifetimes

Author

Listed:
  • Cox, Jayne
  • Griffith, Sarah
  • Giorgi, Sara
  • King, Geoff

Abstract

Throwing products away before they fail or are broken is at the heart of consumer behaviour in developed economies such as the UK. Products are often discarded for reasons of fashion, or to keep up with technological advances, rather than because they have reached the end of their functional life. Such behaviours contribute to resource depletion, greenhouse gas emissions, and physical waste which needs to be managed. Extending the length of time that products are kept in use (whether by their original or subsequent owners) can contribute to greater resource efficiency, with significant potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This research was undertaken to support the development of evidence-based policy in the UK on the role of longer product lifetimes in achieving sustainable consumption and waste prevention. Twelve qualitative discussion groups, involving 115 consumers, were carried out to explore consumer influences on product lifetimes including: which factors influence purchase decisions; the care of products in use; and disposal decisions. A new typology was developed to describe how products meet consumers’ various needs for ‘workhorses’, ‘investment’ and ‘up-to-date’ products; and how lifetime is an outcome of the ‘nature’ of a product (functional life) and its ‘nurture’ (lifetime in use) by consumers. The results demonstrate that consumers have come to expect constant and rapid up-dating of products. In particular, having the latest versions of products is strongly associated with personal identity and feelings of success in life. There is little evidence of concern about the environmental consequences of a ‘throwaway society’. The low cost of new products, which enables rapid updating for reasons of fashion, is a key barrier to encouraging consumers to keep products in use for longer. Some opportunities were identified however for certain ‘workhorse’ and ‘investment’ products that are valued more for their functionality than fashion.

Suggested Citation

  • Cox, Jayne & Griffith, Sarah & Giorgi, Sara & King, Geoff, 2013. "Consumer understanding of product lifetimes," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 21-29.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:79:y:2013:i:c:p:21-29
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.05.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092134491300102X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.05.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tim Cooper, 2005. "Slower Consumption Reflections on Product Life Spans and the “Throwaway Society”," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 9(1‐2), pages 51-67, January.
    2. Curran, Anthony & Williams, Ian D. & Heaven, Sonia, 2007. "Management of household bulky waste in England," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 78-92.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsiliyannis, Christos Aristeides, 2015. "Sustainability by cyclic manufacturing: Assessment of resource preservation under uncertain growth and returns," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 155-170.
    2. Curran, A. & Williams, I.D., 2010. "The role of furniture and appliance re-use organisations in England and Wales," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(10), pages 692-703.
    3. Jungell-Michelsson, Jessica & Heikkurinen, Pasi, 2022. "Sufficiency: A systematic literature review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    4. Sezgin Çağlar Aksezer, 2023. "Sustainability via Extended Warranty Contracts: Design for a Consumer Electronics Retailer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Marcelo Vinhal Nepomuceno & Michel Laroche, 2017. "When Materialists Intend to Resist Consumption: The Moderating Role of Self-Control and Long-Term Orientation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 467-483, July.
    6. Ben Bridgens & Kersty Hobson & Debra Lilley & Jacquetta Lee & Janet L. Scott & Garrath T. Wilson, 2019. "Closing the Loop on E‐waste: A Multidisciplinary Perspective," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(1), pages 169-181, February.
    7. Jouzi, Fatemeh & Levänen, Jarkko & Mikkilä, Mirja & Linnanen, Lassi, 2024. "To spend or to avoid? A critical review on the role of money in aiming for sufficiency," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    8. Nnorom, I.C. & Osibanjo, O., 2008. "Overview of electronic waste (e-waste) management practices and legislations, and their poor applications in the developing countries," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(6), pages 843-858.
    9. Torsten Hummen & Stefanie Hellweg & Ramin Roshandel, 2023. "Optimizing Lifespan of Circular Products: A Generic Dynamic Programming Approach for Energy-Using Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-27, September.
    10. Truttmann, Nina & Rechberger, Helmut, 2006. "Contribution to resource conservation by reuse of electrical and electronic household appliances," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 249-262.
    11. Erik G. Hansen & Ferdinand Revellio, 2020. "Circular value creation architectures: Make, ally, buy, or laissez‐faire," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(6), pages 1250-1273, December.
    12. Kant, Vivek & Tapia, Ridhima & Mondal, Saikat, 2022. "Sustainability of mobile IT sector in industrially developing countries by supporting repairability," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(6).
    13. Alexander, Catherine & Smaje, Chris, 2008. "Evaluating third sector reuse organisations in the UK: Case-studies and analysis of furniture reuse schemes," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 719-730.
    14. Read, Mike & Gregory, Marten K. & Phillips, Paul S., 2009. "An evaluation of four key methods for monitoring household waste prevention campaigns in the UK," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 9-20.
    15. Jessika Luth Richter & Sahra Svensson‐Hoglund & Carl Dalhammar & Jennifer D. Russell & Åke Thidell, 2023. "Taking stock for repair and refurbishing: A review of harvesting of spare parts from electrical and electronic products," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 868-881, June.
    16. Renske van den Berge & Lise Magnier & Ruth Mugge, 2023. "Until death do us part? In‐depth insights into Dutch consumers’ considerations about product lifetimes and lifetime extension," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 908-922, June.
    17. Hennies, Laura & Stamminger, Rainer, 2016. "An empirical survey on the obsolescence of appliances in German households," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 73-82.
    18. Podvorica Ganimete & Ukaj Fatos, 2019. "The Role of Consumers’ Behaviour in Applying Green Marketing: An Economic Analysis of the Non-alcoholic Beverages Industry in Kosova," Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 1-25, December.
    19. Shao-Ping Yang & Shu-Chun Chang & Ta-Ching Liang & Rospita Odorlina P. Situmorang & Minhas Hussain, 2021. "Consumer Confusion and Green Consumption Intentions from the Perspective of Food-Related Lifestyles on Organic Infant Milk Formulas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    20. Mário Barros & Eric Dimla, 2023. "Smartphone repairability indexes in practice: Linking repair scores to industrial design features," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 923-936, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:79:y:2013:i:c:p:21-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.