IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v58y2012icp25-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-economic analysis of textile dye bath wastewater treatment by integrated membrane processes under the zero liquid discharge approach

Author

Listed:
  • Vergili, Ilda
  • Kaya, Yasemin
  • Sen, Unal
  • Gönder, Zeren Beril
  • Aydiner, Coskun

Abstract

The present study was intended to determine the usefulness of the zero liquid discharge (ZLD) approach in treating textile dye bath wastewater via integrated membrane processes. These processes included various combinations of ultrafiltration (UF), loose nanofiltration (NF1), tight nanofiltration (NF2) and reverse osmosis (RO). The technological and economic performance of four scenarios (UF/NF2 (S (I)), NF1/NF2 (S (II)), NF1/RO (S (III)) and UF/NF2/RO (S (IV))), each followed by membrane distillation (MD), were comparatively analysed. The factors considered were capital and operating costs, revenues, benefit/cost (B/C) ratios and pay-back times. The last two scenarios, those including RO, provided the best effluent quality at the end of the pressure-driven membrane filtration process. However, these scenarios were not the most economical options because of the decreased benefits of recycling soda ash and NaCl obtained from the treated wastewater. The unit treatment costs of the scenarios were 1.37, 1.38, 2.16 and 2.01$/m3 of influent for S (I), S (II), S (III) and S (IV), respectively, with return periods of 0.87, 0.91, 2.07 and 1.51 years. The best technological and economic performance was estimated for S (I) and S (II), as indicated by the B/C ratios 3.58 and 3.55, respectively. At the break-even point of 15 years, S (I) required an incineration cost of 77.5$/m3 of MD concentrate, whereas the corresponding costs associated with the other three scenarios were estimated to be 75.7, 43.0 and 35.5$/m3 of MD concentrate, respectively. It was finally concluded that the ZLD approach is most useful in processing textile dye bath waste and recycling treated wastewater. This process is both technically feasible and economically viable, as indicated by the high B/C ratio. However, the unit incineration cost associated with the concentrate would limit the return period of the investment, and the success of this method would also depend principally on the real volume of MD processed due to its large contribution (70–90%) to the B/C ratio.

Suggested Citation

  • Vergili, Ilda & Kaya, Yasemin & Sen, Unal & Gönder, Zeren Beril & Aydiner, Coskun, 2012. "Techno-economic analysis of textile dye bath wastewater treatment by integrated membrane processes under the zero liquid discharge approach," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 25-35.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:58:y:2012:i:c:p:25-35
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.10.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344911002072
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.10.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ranganathan, K. & Karunagaran, K. & Sharma, D.C., 2007. "Recycling of wastewaters of textile dyeing industries using advanced treatment technology and cost analysis—Case studies," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 306-318.
    2. Muneer, T. & Asif, M. & Cizmecioglu, Z. & Ozturk, H.K., 2008. "Prospects for solar water heating within Turkish textile industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 807-823, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dagdougui, Hanane & Ouammi, Ahmed & Robba, Michela & Sacile, Roberto, 2011. "Thermal analysis and performance optimization of a solar water heater flat plate collector: Application to Tétouan (Morocco)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 630-638, January.
    2. Asif, M., 2016. "Growth and sustainability trends in the buildings sector in the GCC region with particular reference to the KSA and UAE," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1267-1273.
    3. Aravin Prince Periyasamy, 2024. "Recent Advances in the Remediation of Textile-Dye-Containing Wastewater: Prioritizing Human Health and Sustainable Wastewater Treatment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-41, January.
    4. Bhutto, Abdul Waheed & Bazmi, Aqeel Ahmed & Zahedi, Gholamreza, 2012. "Greener energy: Issues and challenges for Pakistan—Solar energy prospective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2762-2780.
    5. Du, Bin & Hu, Eric & Kolhe, Mohan, 2013. "An experimental platform for heat pipe solar collector testing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 119-125.
    6. Farjana, Shahjadi Hisan & Huda, Nazmul & Mahmud, M.A. Parvez & Saidur, R., 2018. "Solar industrial process heating systems in operation – Current SHIP plants and future prospects in Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 409-419.
    7. Sıdıka Ece Yılmaz & Hasan Yildizhan & Cihan Yıldırım & Chuang-Yao Zhao & João Gomes & Tarik Alkharusi, 2023. "The Drivers and Barriers of the Solar Water Heating Entrepreneurial System: A Cost–Benefit Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Jamal Al-Qawasmi & Muhammad Asif & Ahmed Abd El Fattah & Mohammad O. Babsail, 2019. "Water Efficiency and Management in Sustainable Building Rating Systems: Examining Variation in Criteria Usage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Farjana, Shahjadi Hisan & Huda, Nazmul & Mahmud, M.A. Parvez & Saidur, R., 2018. "Solar process heat in industrial systems – A global review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2270-2286.
    10. Sharma, Ashish K. & Sharma, Chandan & Mullick, Subhash C. & Kandpal, Tara C., 2017. "Solar industrial process heating: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 124-137.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:58:y:2012:i:c:p:25-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.