IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v51y2007i4p792-826.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A life cycle based multi-objective optimization model for the management of computer waste

Author

Listed:
  • Ahluwalia, Poonam Khanijo
  • Nema, Arvind K.

Abstract

The accelerating pace of waste generation from used electrical and electronic equipment is of growing global concern. Within this waste stream, computer hardware is quite significant in terms of both volume and risk to the environment because of the hazardous materials within it. The waste management hierarchy of prevention, reuse, recycle, treatment and disposal in landfill is accepted as a universal guideline for waste management. The contemporary concept of integrated solid waste management is very complex comprising of not only the environmental aspects or the technical aspects of the waste management hierarchy, but also incorporating economic, institutional, perceived risk and social issues in the context of complete life cycle of waste. Moreover, when to shift from one stage of hierarchy to another, is an involved decision warranting inclusion of several case specific issues. This paper presents a life cycle based multi-objective model that can help decision makers in integrated waste management. The proposed model has been applied to a case study of computer waste scenario in Delhi, India, which apart from having computer waste from its native population receives large quantities of imported second hand computers. The model has been used to evaluate management cost and reuse time span or life cycle of various streams of computer waste for different objectives of economy, perceived risk and environmental impact. The model results for different scenarios of waste generation have been analyzed to understand the tradeoffs between cost, perceived risk and environmental impact. The optimum life cycle of a computer desktop was observed to be shorter by 25% while optimizing cost than while optimizing impact to the environment or risk perceived by public. Proposed integrated approach can be useful for determining the optimum life cycle of computer waste, as well as optimum configuration of waste management facilities, for urban centers where computer waste related issues are of growing concern.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahluwalia, Poonam Khanijo & Nema, Arvind K., 2007. "A life cycle based multi-objective optimization model for the management of computer waste," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 792-826.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:51:y:2007:i:4:p:792-826
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.01.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344907000043
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.01.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael K. Lindell & Timothy C. Earle, 1983. "How Close Is Close Enough: Public Perceptions of the Risks of Industrial Facilities," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(4), pages 245-253, December.
    2. Giannikos, Ioannis, 1998. "A multiobjective programming model for locating treatment sites and routing hazardous wastes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 333-342, January.
    3. Charles ReVelle & Jared Cohon & Donald Shobrys, 1991. "Simultaneous Siting and Routing in the Disposal of Hazardous Wastes," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 138-145, May.
    4. Jill J. McCluskey & Gordon C. Rausser, 2001. "Estimation of Perceived Risk and Its Effect on Property Values," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 77(1), pages 42-55.
    5. Gary H. McClelland & William D. Schulze & Brian Hurd, 1990. "The Effect of Risk Beliefs on Property Values: A Case Study of a Hazardous Waste Site," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(4), pages 485-497, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dehghanian, Farzad & Mansour, Saeed, 2009. "Designing sustainable recovery network of end-of-life products using genetic algorithm," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(10), pages 559-570.
    2. Nnorom, I.C. & Osibanjo, O. & Ogwuegbu, M.O.C., 2011. "Global disposal strategies for waste cathode ray tubes," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 275-290.
    3. Bonnin, Marie & Azzaro-Pantel, Catherine & Domenech, Serge & Villeneuve, Jacques, 2015. "Multicriteria optimization of copper scrap management strategy," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 48-62.
    4. Seyed Hamed Ghanadpour & Sajjad Shokouhyar & Mohadeseh Pourabbasi, 2023. "Effective end‑of‑life (EOL) products management in mobile phone industry with using Twitter data analysis perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11337-11366, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Berglund & Changhyun Kwon, 2014. "Robust Facility Location Problem for Hazardous Waste Transportation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 91-116, March.
    2. Hunkar Toyoglu & Oya Ekin Karasan & Bahar Yetis Kara, 2011. "Distribution network design on the battlefield," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(3), pages 188-209, April.
    3. Joaquín Pacheco & Rafael Caballero & Manuel Laguna & Julián Molina, 2013. "Bi-Objective Bus Routing: An Application to School Buses in Rural Areas," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 397-411, August.
    4. Jun Zhao & Lixiang Huang, 2019. "Multi-Period Network Design Problem in Regional Hazardous Waste Management Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-27, June.
    5. Nagy, Gabor & Salhi, Said, 2007. "Location-routing: Issues, models and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 649-672, March.
    6. Caballero, Rafael & Gonzalez, Mercedes & Guerrero, Flor M & Molina, Julian & Paralera, Concepcion, 2007. "Solving a multiobjective location routing problem with a metaheuristic based on tabu search. Application to a real case in Andalusia," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1751-1763, March.
    7. Zhao, Jiahong & Ke, Ginger Y., 2017. "Incorporating inventory risks in location-routing models for explosive waste management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 123-136.
    8. Leslie A. Nieves & Jeffery J. Himmelberger & Samuel J. Ratick & Allen L. White, 1992. "Negotiated Compensation for Solid‐Waste Disposal Facility Siting: An Analysis of the Wisconsin Experience," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 505-511, December.
    9. Chunlin Xin & Jie Wang & Ziping Wang & Chia-Huei Wu & Muhammad Nawaz & Sang-Bing Tsai, 2022. "Reverse logistics research of municipal hazardous waste: a literature review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1495-1531, February.
    10. Ghaderi, Abdolsalam & Burdett, Robert L., 2019. "An integrated location and routing approach for transporting hazardous materials in a bi-modal transportation network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 49-65.
    11. Andres Jauregui & Diane Hite, 2010. "The impact of real estate agents on house prices near environmental disamenities," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 295-316, March.
    12. Jill J. McCluskey & Gordon C. Rausser, 2001. "Estimation of Perceived Risk and Its Effect on Property Values," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 77(1), pages 42-55.
    13. Misagh Rahbari & Alireza Arshadi Khamseh & Yaser Sadati-Keneti & Mohammad Javad Jafari, 2022. "A risk-based green location-inventory-routing problem for hazardous materials: NSGA II, MOSA, and multi-objective black widow optimization," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2804-2840, February.
    14. Nasrin Asgari & Mohsen Rajabi & Masoumeh Jamshidi & Maryam Khatami & Reza Zanjirani Farahani, 2017. "A memetic algorithm for a multi-objective obnoxious waste location-routing problem: a case study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 250(2), pages 279-308, March.
    15. Glenn C. Blomquist, 2004. "Self-Protection and Averting Behavior, Values of Statistical Lives, and Benefit Cost Analysis of Environmental Policy," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 89-110, March.
    16. Mohammadi, Mehrdad & Jula, Payman & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza, 2017. "Design of a reliable multi-modal multi-commodity model for hazardous materials transportation under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 792-809.
    17. Zhao, Jun & Huang, Lixia & Lee, Der-Horng & Peng, Qiyuan, 2016. "Improved approaches to the network design problem in regional hazardous waste management systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 52-75.
    18. Dell'Olmo, Paolo & Gentili, Monica & Scozzari, Andrea, 2005. "On finding dissimilar Pareto-optimal paths," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(1), pages 70-82, April.
    19. Robin Gregory & Howard Kunreuther & Doug Easterling & Ken Richards, 1991. "Incentives Policies to Site Hazardous Waste Facilities," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), pages 667-675, December.
    20. Yan Sun & Maoxiang Lang & Danzhu Wang, 2016. "Bi-Objective Modelling for Hazardous Materials Road–Rail Multimodal Routing Problem with Railway Schedule-Based Space–Time Constraints," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-31, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:51:y:2007:i:4:p:792-826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.