IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v49y2007i3p244-263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental and economic modelling: A case study of municipal solid waste management scenarios in Wales

Author

Listed:
  • Emery, Andrew
  • Davies, Anthony
  • Griffiths, Anthony
  • Williams, Keith

Abstract

In recent years the burdens that waste puts on the environment has been widely publicised. To address the earth's dwindling resources and the growing mountains of waste many countries have introduced statutory waste minimisation and recovery targets. The general public are generally more concerned with the effects that waste has on the environment. Whereas waste managers and planners need to consider the financial costs of collection, processing and disposal. This paper investigates and reports on the findings for both of these areas of concern. A case study area in a typical South Wales valley location was selected to model the environmental and economic impacts of a number of waste disposal scenarios. The environmental impacts of a number of waste management scenarios were compared using a life cycle assessment (LCA) computer model. An interactive microsoft excel spreadsheet model was also developed to examine the costs, employment and recovery rates achieved using various waste recovery methods including kerbside recycling and incineration. The LCA analysis showed the incineration option to be more favourable than the landfill and recycling/composting options. However, the economic modelling results showed higher running costs and lower associated jobs when compared to the other options such as recycling. The paper concludes by suggesting that integrated waste management will ultimately be the most efficient approach in terms of both economics and also environment benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Emery, Andrew & Davies, Anthony & Griffiths, Anthony & Williams, Keith, 2007. "Environmental and economic modelling: A case study of municipal solid waste management scenarios in Wales," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 244-263.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:49:y:2007:i:3:p:244-263
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.03.016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344906000619
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.03.016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard York & Eugene A. Rosa & Thomas Dietz, 2004. "The Ecological Footprint Intensity of National Economies," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 8(4), pages 139-154, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhao, Yan & Deng, Wenjing, 2014. "Environmental impacts of different food waste resource technologies and the effects of energy mix," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 214-221.
    2. Woon, Kok Sin & Lo, Irene M.C., 2016. "An integrated life cycle costing and human health impact analysis of municipal solid waste management options in Hong Kong using modified eco-efficiency indicator," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 104-114.
    3. Leme, Marcio Montagnana Vicente & Rocha, Mateus Henrique & Lora, Electo Eduardo Silva & Venturini, Osvaldo José & Lopes, Bruno Marciano & Ferreira, Cláudio Homero, 2014. "Techno-economic analysis and environmental impact assessment of energy recovery from Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) in Brazil," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 8-20.
    4. Yiyao Ni & Zhen Zhang, 2024. "Comparison and Selection of Wet Waste Disposal Modes for Villages in Agriculture-Related Towns Taking Shanghai, China, as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Emmanuel Kazuva & Jiquan Zhang, 2019. "Analyzing Municipal Solid Waste Treatment Scenarios in Rapidly Urbanizing Cities in Developing Countries: The Case of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, June.
    6. Kate Kim & Farzad Hourfar & Abdul Halim Bin Abdul Razik & Muhammad Rizwan & Ali Almansoori & Michael Fowler & Ali Elkamel, 2023. "Importance of Microalgae and Municipal Waste in Bioenergy Products Hierarchy—Integration of Biorefineries for Microalgae and Municipal Waste Processing: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-39, September.
    7. Fujii, Minoru & Fujita, Tsuyoshi & Chen, Xudong & Ohnishi, Satoshi & Yamaguchi, Naohisa, 2012. "Smart recycling of organic solid wastes in an environmentally sustainable society," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-8.
    8. Ferrão, Paulo & Ribeiro, Paulo & Rodrigues, João & Marques, Alexandra & Preto, Miguel & Amaral, Miguel & Domingos, Tiago & Lopes, Ana & Costa, e Inês, 2014. "Environmental, economic and social costs and benefits of a packaging waste management system: A Portuguese case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 67-78.
    9. Eriksson, O. & Baky, A., 2010. "Identification and testing of potential key parameters in system analysis of municipal solid waste management," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1095-1099.
    10. Achillas, Ch. & Vlachokostas, Ch. & Moussiopoulos, N. & Banias, G. & Kafetzopoulos, G. & Karagiannidis, A., 2011. "Social acceptance for the development of a waste-to-energy plant in an urban area," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(9), pages 857-863.
    11. Lombrano, Alessandro, 2009. "Cost efficiency in the management of solid urban waste," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(11), pages 601-611.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Esposito, Piero & Patriarca, Fabrizio & Salvati, Luca, 2018. "Tertiarization and land use change: The case of Italy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 80-86.
    2. Tao Liu & Jixia Li & Juan Chen & Shaolei Yang, 2019. "Urban Ecological Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors—A Case Study in Henan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Oppon, Eunice & Richter, Justin S. & Koh, S.C. Lenny & Nabayiga, Hellen, 2023. "Macro-level economic and environmental sustainability of negative emission technologies; Case study of crushed silicate production for enhanced weathering," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    4. Gergely Tóth & Cecília Szigeti & Gábor Harangozó & Dániel Róbert Szabó, 2018. "Ecological Footprint at the Micro-Scale—How It Can Save Costs: The Case of ENPRO," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Kahn, Matthew E., 2007. "Do greens drive Hummers or hybrids? Environmental ideology as a determinant of consumer choice," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 129-145, September.
    6. Eyup Dogan & Nigar Taspinar & Korhan K Gokmenoglu, 2019. "Determinants of ecological footprint in MINT countries," Energy & Environment, , vol. 30(6), pages 1065-1086, September.
    7. Siyu Zhu & Ying Ding & Run Pan & Aifang Ding, 2023. "Analysis of Interprovincial Differences in CO 2 Emissions and Peak Prediction in the Yangtze River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Muhammad Shahzad Sardar & Nabila Asghar & Mubbasher Munir & Reda Alhajj & Hafeez ur Rehman, 2022. "Moderation of Services’ EKC through Transportation Competitiveness: PQR Model in Global Prospective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Amirmohsen Behjat & Mohammad Hassan Tarazkar, 2021. "Investigating the factors affecting the ecological well-being performance in Iran from 1994 to 2014," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 13871-13889, September.
    10. Thomas Wiedmann & John Barrett, 2010. "A Review of the Ecological Footprint Indicator—Perceptions and Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(6), pages 1-49, June.
    11. Daniel A. Salas & Paulina Criollo & Angel D. Ramirez, 2021. "The Role of Higher Education Institutions in the Implementation of Circular Economy in Latin America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-27, August.
    12. Bertinelli, Luisito & Strobl, Eric & Zou, Benteng, 2008. "Economic development and environmental quality: A reassessment in light of nature's self-regeneration capacity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(2-3), pages 371-378, June.
    13. Ahmet ATIL ASICI & Sevil ACAR, 2017. "The carbon footprint of countries’ production and imports: an Environmental Kuznets Curve approach," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 46, pages 7-19.
    14. Bimonte, Salvatore & Stabile, Arsenio, 2017. "Land consumption and income in Italy: a case of inverted EKC," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 36-43.
    15. Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel & Bekun, Festus Victor & Etokakpan, Mfonobong Udom & Driha, Oana M., 2019. "A road to enhancements in natural gas use in Iran: A multivariate modelling approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    16. Djedaiet, Aissa & Ayad, Hicham & Ben-Salha, Ousama, 2024. "Oil prices and the load capacity factor in African oil-producing OPEC members: Modeling the symmetric and asymmetric effects," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    17. Stefano B. Longo & Brett Clark & Thomas E. Shriver & Rebecca Clausen, 2016. "Sustainability and Environmental Sociology: Putting the Economy in its Place and Moving Toward an Integrative Socio-Ecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-17, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:49:y:2007:i:3:p:244-263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.