IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v114y2016icp92-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterization of municipal solid waste collection operations

Author

Listed:
  • Jaunich, Megan K.
  • Levis, James W.
  • DeCarolis, Joseph F.
  • Gaston, Eliana V.
  • Barlaz, Morton A.
  • Bartelt-Hunt, Shannon L.
  • Jones, Elizabeth G.
  • Hauser, Lauren
  • Jaikumar, Rohit

Abstract

Solid waste collection contributes to the cost, emissions, and fossil fuel required to manage municipal solid waste. Mechanistic models to estimate these parameters are necessary to perform integrated assessments of solid waste management alternatives using a life-cycle approach; however, models are only as good as their parameterization. This study presents operational waste collection data that can be used in life-cycle models for areas with similar collection systems, and provides illustrative results from a collection process model using operational data. Fuel use and times associated with various aspects of waste collection were obtained for vehicles collecting mixed residential (residual) waste, recyclables, and yard waste from single-family residences in selected municipalities. The total average fuel economy for similarly-sized diesel collection vehicles was 0.6-1.4km/L (1.4–3.3mpg (miles per gallon)) for residual waste and 0.8–1km/L (1.9–2.4mpg) for recyclables. For residual waste and recyclables collection stops, the average time to collect at each residence using automated collection was 11–12s and 13–17s, respectively. The average time between stops was 11–12s and 10–13 for residuals and recyclables, respectively. A single yard waste route was observed, and all collection times were longer than those measured for either recycling or residual waste. Unload or tip times were obtained or measured at a landfill, transfer station, and material recovery facility (MRF). Average time to unload was 7–9min at a MRF, 14–22min at a landfill, and 11min at a transfer station. Commercial and multi-family collection vehicles tend to have longer stops and spend more time between stops than single-family collection, and a larger portion of fuel is used while driving relative to single-family collection. Roll-off vehicles, which collect more waste per stop, spend longer at each stop and drive longer distances between stops than front-loader vehicles. Diesel roll-offs averaged 2.4km/L (5.7mpg) and front-loaders averaged 1.4km/L (3.3mpg).

Suggested Citation

  • Jaunich, Megan K. & Levis, James W. & DeCarolis, Joseph F. & Gaston, Eliana V. & Barlaz, Morton A. & Bartelt-Hunt, Shannon L. & Jones, Elizabeth G. & Hauser, Lauren & Jaikumar, Rohit, 2016. "Characterization of municipal solid waste collection operations," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 92-102.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:114:y:2016:i:c:p:92-102
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.07.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344916301860
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.07.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Florio, Alexandre M. & Gendreau, Michel & Hartl, Richard F. & Minner, Stefan & Vidal, Thibaut, 2023. "Recent advances in vehicle routing with stochastic demands: Bayesian learning for correlated demands and elementary branch-price-and-cut," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1081-1093.
    2. De La Vega, Jonathan & Gendreau, Michel & Morabito, Reinaldo & Munari, Pedro & Ordóñez, Fernando, 2023. "An integer L-shaped algorithm for the vehicle routing problem with time windows and stochastic demands," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(2), pages 676-695.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:114:y:2016:i:c:p:92-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.