IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v109y2016icp123-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-objective model for selecting design alternatives and end-of-life options under uncertainty: A sustainable approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ameli, Mariam
  • Mansour, Saeed
  • Ahmadi-Javid, Amir

Abstract

Sustainable product design, which focuses on evaluating the future impacts of products at the design stage, is an important task for the achievement of sustainability goals. A product's designer has significant freedom at the design stage, so end-of-life (EOL) considerations can be taken into account at this stage. This paper presents a bicriteria stochastic optimization model based on individual extended producer responsibility to improve product EOL management by considering life cycle issues at the product design stage. The objectives are the maximization of the total profit and the minimization of the product's environmental impact with respect to regulatory restrictions, such as the waste electrical and electronic equipment directive. Uncertainties are considered, to mitigate risks of unknown information that may come to light in the future. Various risk measures are used in the model. A simulation-based method is presented to determine the model's Pareto optimal solutions. A hypothetical case study is provided, and several sensitivity analyses are carried out. Results show that the regulatory restriction strongly affects the number of Pareto optimal solutions. Moreover, taking environmental considerations into account results in a significant profit reduction. It is also observed that using different risk measures yields considerably different sets of Pareto optimal solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ameli, Mariam & Mansour, Saeed & Ahmadi-Javid, Amir, 2016. "A multi-objective model for selecting design alternatives and end-of-life options under uncertainty: A sustainable approach," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 123-136.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:109:y:2016:i:c:p:123-136
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.01.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344916300118
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.01.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Unknown, 2005. "End Materials," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 20(1), pages 1-1.
    2. Pierreval, Henri & Durieux-Paris, Severine, 2007. "Robust simulation with a base environmental scenario," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(2), pages 783-793, October.
    3. Ardente, Fulvio & Calero Pastor, Maria & Mathieux, Fabrice & Talens Peiró, Laura, 2015. "Analysis of end-of-life treatments of commercial refrigerating appliances: Bridging product and waste policies," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 42-52.
    4. Krystofik, Mark & Wagner, Jeffrey & Gaustad, Gabrielle, 2015. "Leveraging intellectual property rights to encourage green product design and remanufacturing for sustainable waste management," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 44-54.
    5. Kibzun, Andrey I. & Kuznetsov, Evgeniy A., 2006. "Analysis of criteria VaR and CVaR," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 779-796, February.
    6. Nnorom, I.C. & Osibanjo, O., 2008. "Overview of electronic waste (e-waste) management practices and legislations, and their poor applications in the developing countries," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(6), pages 843-858.
    7. Dehghanian, Farzad & Mansour, Saeed, 2009. "Designing sustainable recovery network of end-of-life products using genetic algorithm," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(10), pages 559-570.
    8. Inderfurth, K. & de Kok, A. G. & Flapper, S. D. P., 2001. "Product recovery in stochastic remanufacturing systems with multiple reuse options," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 130-152, August.
    9. Thomas Lindhqvist & Reid Lifset, 2003. "Can We Take the Concept of Individual Producer Responsibility from Theory to Practice?," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 7(2), pages 3-6, April.
    10. Um, Jumyung & Yoon, Joo-Sung & Suh, Suk-Hwan, 2008. "An architecture design with data model for product recovery management systems," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(10), pages 1175-1184.
    11. A. Ahmadi-Javid, 2012. "Entropic Value-at-Risk: A New Coherent Risk Measure," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 1105-1123, December.
    12. Mascle, Christian, 2013. "Design for rebirth (DFRb) and data structure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 235-246.
    13. Song, Jong-Sung & Lee, Kun-Mo, 2010. "Development of a low-carbon product design system based on embedded GHG emissions," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(9), pages 547-556.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meng Gao & Ke Ma & Renke He & Carlo Vezzoli & Nuo Li, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainable Product Design Methods from 1999 to 2022: Trends, Progress, and Disparities between China and the Rest of the World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Nakatani, Jun & Konno, Kiyoto & Moriguchi, Yuichi, 2017. "Variability-based optimal design for robust plastic recycling systems," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 53-60.
    3. Davood Omidzadeh & Seyed Mojtaba Sajadi & Ali Bozorgi-Amiri & Mohammad Daneshvar Kakhki, 2024. "Enhancing Sustainability Attributes in New Product Design Insights from Automotive Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-31, July.
    4. Hasnain Abbas & Lindu Zhao & Xi Gong & Mengyin Jiang & Tahira Faiz, 2024. "Environmental and economic influences of postharvest losses across the fish-food products supply chain in the developing regions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 28335-28366, November.
    5. Seyed Hamed Ghanadpour & Sajjad Shokouhyar & Mohadeseh Pourabbasi, 2023. "Effective end‑of‑life (EOL) products management in mobile phone industry with using Twitter data analysis perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11337-11366, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chun-Che Huang & Wen-Yau Liang & Shan-Ru Yi, 2017. "Cloud-based design for disassembly to create environmentally friendly products," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 1203-1218, June.
    2. Tsiliyannis, Christos Aristeides, 2015. "Sustainability by cyclic manufacturing: Assessment of resource preservation under uncertain growth and returns," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 155-170.
    3. Shi, Jingjing & Li, Qiang & Li, Huiquan & Li, Shaopeng & Zhang, Jianbo & Shi, Yao, 2017. "Eco-design for recycled products: Rejuvenating mullite from coal fly ash," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 67-73.
    4. Liu, Wenjie & Liu, Wei & Shen, Ningning & Xu, Zhitao & Xie, Naiming & Chen, Jian & Zhou, Huiyu, 2022. "Pricing and collection decisions of a closed-loop supply chain with fuzzy demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    5. Chung, Sung H. & Weaver, Robert D. & Friesz, Terry L., 2013. "Strategic response to pollution taxes in supply chain networks: Dynamic, spatial, and organizational dimensions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 314-327.
    6. Caiado, Nathália & Guarnieri, Patricia & Xavier, Lúcia Helena & de Lorena Diniz Chaves, Gisele, 2017. "A characterization of the Brazilian market of reverse logistic credits (RLC) and an analogy with the existing carbon credit market," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 47-59.
    7. Lefeuvre, Anaële & Garnier, Sébastien & Jacquemin, Leslie & Pillain, Baptiste & Sonnemann, Guido, 2017. "Anticipating in-use stocks of carbon fiber reinforced polymers and related waste flows generated by the commercial aeronautical sector until 2050," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 264-272.
    8. Mallawarachchi, Harshani & Karunasena, Gayani, 2012. "Electronic and electrical waste management in Sri Lanka: Suggestions for national policy enhancements," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 44-53.
    9. Michael W. Toffel & Antoinette Stein & Katharine L. Lee, 2008. "Extending Producer Responsibility: An Evaluation Framework for Product Take-Back Policies," Harvard Business School Working Papers 09-026, Harvard Business School.
    10. Umair, Shakila & Björklund, Anna & Petersen, Elisabeth Ekener, 2015. "Social impact assessment of informal recycling of electronic ICT waste in Pakistan using UNEP SETAC guidelines," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 46-57.
    11. Pardis Pourmohammadi & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam & Yaser Rahimi & Chefi Triki, 2023. "Solving a hub location-routing problem with a queue system under social responsibility by a fuzzy meta-heuristic algorithm," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 1099-1128, May.
    12. Shraddha Mishra & Surya Prakash Singh, 2022. "Designing dynamic reverse logistics network for post-sale service," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 310(1), pages 89-118, March.
    13. Roy, Bernard, 2010. "Robustness in operational research and decision aiding: A multi-faceted issue," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 629-638, February.
    14. Steeneck, Daniel W. & Sarin, Subhash C., 2018. "Product design for leased products under remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 132-144.
    15. Guo, Shanshan & Aydin, Goker & Souza, Gilvan C., 2014. "Dismantle or remanufacture?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 580-583.
    16. Abhishek Nandan & Albin C. Suresh & Parth Saole & S. Amulya Jeevanasai & Ramprasad Chandrasekaran & Lucas Meili & Nur Izyan Wan Azelee & Rangabhashiyam Selvasembian, 2023. "An Integrated Approach for Electronic Waste Management—Overview of Sources of Generation, Toxicological Effects, Assessment, Governance, and Mitigation Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-19, December.
    17. da Costa, B. Freitas Paulo & Pesenti, Silvana M. & Targino, Rodrigo S., 2023. "Risk budgeting portfolios from simulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 1040-1056.
    18. Avinash N. Madavan & Subhonmesh Bose, 2021. "A Stochastic Primal-Dual Method for Optimization with Conditional Value at Risk Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 190(2), pages 428-460, August.
    19. Neves, Sónia Almeida & Marques, António Cardoso & de Sá Lopes, Leonardo Batista, 2024. "Is environmental regulation keeping e-waste under control? Evidence from e-waste exports in the European Union," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    20. R. Tyrrell Rockafellar, 2024. "Distributional robustness, stochastic divergences, and the quadrangle of risk," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-30, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:109:y:2016:i:c:p:123-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.