IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v277y2024ics0925527324002433.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating risk of IoT adoption in the food supply chain using an integrated interval-valued spherical fuzzy generalised TODIM method

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Yu
  • Wang, Weizhong
  • Yang, Zhengyan
  • Deveci, Muhammet
  • Delen, Dursun

Abstract

The existing literature has shown that the Internet of Things (IoT) has proven to be beneficial for managing operations in the food supply chain. However, the potential failures resulting from these new technologies have not been thoroughly examined. Therefore, the aim of this study is to create a new framework for analyzing the risks associated with implementing IoT in the food supply chain. To achieve this, we introduce an extended failure mode and effect analysis framework using an integrated generalised Toma de Decisão Iterativa Multicritério (TODIM) method within the interval-valued spherical fuzzy setting. Initially, we developed a risk structure consisting of four dimensions and sixteen sub-factors to facilitate the implementation of IoT technology in the food supply chain. We then introduced an interval-valued spherical fuzzy-weighted Bonferroni mean operator to gather expert opinions and create a group risk matrix considering the interaction between the input risk data. Subsequently, we proposed a newly developed interval-valued spherical fuzzy TODIM method based on the Logarithmic percentage change-driven objective weighting (LOPCOW) method to evaluate and rank the risks associated with IoT application in the food supply chain. This method can capture the bounded rational decision behavior of experts and the uncertain preference of risk parameters. Based on the identified risk factors, we implemented a proposed risk analysis framework in line with the preferences of the experts. The results indicate that "human resource risk" and "uncertainty in technology adoption" are the most and least significant risks, respectively. We also conducted sensitivity and comparison studies to test the reliability and rationality of the proposed framework. The main findings can assist policymakers and managers in mitigating and minimizing the risks connected with IoT applications in the food supply chain. Additionally, these outcomes can aid stakeholders in making well-informed decisions about resource allocation for risk management.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Yu & Wang, Weizhong & Yang, Zhengyan & Deveci, Muhammet & Delen, Dursun, 2024. "Evaluating risk of IoT adoption in the food supply chain using an integrated interval-valued spherical fuzzy generalised TODIM method," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:277:y:2024:i:c:s0925527324002433
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109386
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527324002433
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109386?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Weizhong & Chen, Yu & Wang, Yi & Deveci, Muhammet & Cheng, Shuping & Brito-Parada, Pablo R., 2024. "A decision support framework for humanitarian supply chain management – Analysing enablers of AI-HI integration using a complex spherical fuzzy DEMATEL-MARCOS method," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    2. Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Jalaladdin & Amiri, Maghsoud, 2023. "Evaluating the risks of the internet of things in renewable energy systems using a hybrid fuzzy decision approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    3. Chirumalla, Koteshwar, 2021. "Building digitally-enabled process innovation in the process industries: A dynamic capabilities approach," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    4. Wang, Weizhong & Chen, Yu & Zhang, Tinglong & Deveci, Muhammet & Kadry, Seifedine, 2024. "The use of AI to uncover the supply chain dynamics of the primary sector: Building resilience in the food supply chain," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 544-566.
    5. Maria Akram & Kifayat Ullah & Dragan Pamucar, 2022. "Performance Evaluation of Solar Energy Cells Using the Interval-Valued T-Spherical Fuzzy Bonferroni Mean Operators," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, January.
    6. Yin-Yee Leong & Yen-Chih Chen, 2020. "Cyber risk cost and management in IoT devices-linked health insurance," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 45(4), pages 737-759, October.
    7. Özlem Arslan & Necip Karakurt & Ecem Cem & Selcuk Cebi, 2023. "Risk Analysis in the Food Cold Chain Using Decomposed Fuzzy Set-Based FMEA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Kumar, Shashank & Raut, Rakesh D. & Agrawal, Nishant & Cheikhrouhou, Naoufel & Sharma, Mahak & Daim, Tugrul, 2022. "Integrated blockchain and internet of things in the food supply chain: Adoption barriers," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    9. Rodrigo Goyannes Gusmão Caiado & Luiz Felipe Scavarda & Bruno Duarte Azevedo & Daniel Luiz de Mattos Nascimento & Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas, 2022. "Challenges and Benefits of Sustainable Industry 4.0 for Operations and Supply Chain Management—A Framework Headed toward the 2030 Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-26, January.
    10. Minguito, Glenda & Banluta, Jenith, 2023. "Risk management in humanitarian supply chain based on FMEA and grey relational analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    11. Ecer, Fatih & Küçükönder, Hande & Kayapınar Kaya, Sema & Faruk Görçün, Ömer, 2023. "Sustainability performance analysis of micro-mobility solutions in urban transportation with a novel IVFNN-Delphi-LOPCOW-CoCoSo framework," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pedro Reyes-Norambuena & Javier Martinez-Torres & Alireza Nemati & Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Jurgita Antucheviciene, 2024. "Towards Sustainable Urban Futures: Integrating a Novel Grey Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for Optimal Pedestrian Walkway Site Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Kupeli, Birgul & Salman, Gulberk Gultekin & Karaosmanoglu, Elif & Daim, Tugrul, 2024. "Exploring self-service technology adoption: Case of airline check in," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Galeone, Graziana & Ranaldo, Simona & Fusco, Antonio, 2024. "ESG and FinTech: Are they connected?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    4. Andrzej Ożadowicz & Gabriela Walczyk, 2023. "Energy Performance and Control Strategy for Dynamic Façade with Perovskite PV Panels—Technical Analysis and Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Jalaladdin & Amiri, Maghsoud & Mostafaeipour, Ali & Le, Ttu, 2024. "Evaluation of renewable energy projects based on sustainability goals using a hybrid pythagorean fuzzy-based decision approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    6. Kuei-Hu Chang & Yi-Jun Chen & Chung-Cheng Liao, 2024. "A novel improved FMEA method using data envelopment analysis method and 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 341(1), pages 485-507, October.
    7. Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Jalaladdin & Amiri, Maghsoud & Hosseini Bamakan, Seyed Mojtaba, 2024. "Evaluating the blockchain technology strategies for reducing renewable energy development risks using a novel integrated decision framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    8. Li, Chengming & Huo, Peng & Wang, Zeyu & Zhang, Weiguang & Liang, Feiyan & Mardani, Abbas, 2023. "Digitalization generates equality? Enterprises’ digital transformation, financing constraints, and labor share in China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    9. Wang, Weizhong & Chen, Yu & Zhang, Tinglong & Deveci, Muhammet & Kadry, Seifedine, 2024. "The use of AI to uncover the supply chain dynamics of the primary sector: Building resilience in the food supply chain," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 544-566.
    10. Nishant Agrawal & Meysam Rabiee & Mona Jabbari, 2024. "Contextual relationships in Juran’s quality principles for business sustainable growth under circular economy perspective: a decision support system approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(1), pages 47-77, November.
    11. Kuen-Suan Chen & Tsun-Hung Huang & Chun-Min Yu & Hui-E Lee, 2024. "Fuzzy Evaluation Model for Operational Performance of Air Cleaning Equipment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-12, August.
    12. Hui Zhang & Huiying Ding & Jianying Xiao, 2023. "How Organizational Agility Promotes Digital Transformation: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-13, July.
    13. Fernandes, Kiran Jude & Milewski, Simon & Chaudhuri, Atanu & Xiong, Yu, 2022. "Contextualising the role of external partnerships to innovate the core and enabling processes of an organisation: A resource and knowledge-based view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 146-162.
    14. Luai Jraisat & Mohannad Jreissat & Arvind Upadhyay & Farhana Sajjad & Krishna Chandra Balodi, 2022. "Paradox of strategic partnerships for sustainable value chains: Perspectives of not‐for‐profit actors," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3491-3508, November.
    15. Nebiyu Kedir & Phuong H. D. Nguyen & Citlaly Pérez & Pedro Ponce & Aminah Robinson Fayek, 2023. "Systematic Literature Review on Fuzzy Hybrid Methods in Photovoltaic Solar Energy: Opportunities, Challenges, and Guidance for Implementation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-38, April.
    16. Marzena Podgórska, 2022. "Challenges and Perspectives in Innovative Projects Focused on Sustainable Industry 4.0—A Case Study on Polish Project Teams," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Denicolai, Stefano & Previtali, Pietro, 2023. "Innovation strategy and digital transformation execution in healthcare: The role of the general manager," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    18. Caiado, Rodrigo Goyannes Gusmão & Machado, Eduardo & Santos, Renan Silva & Thomé, Antonio Márcio Tavares & Scavarda, Luiz Felipe, 2024. "Sustainable I4.0 integration and transition to I5.0 in traditional and digital technological organisations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    19. Lei Shen & Xi Zhang & Hongda Liu, 2022. "Digital technology adoption, digital dynamic capability, and digital transformation performance of textile industry: Moderating role of digital innovation orientation," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2038-2054, September.
    20. Shore, Adam & Tiwari, Manisha & Tandon, Priyanka & Foropon, Cyril, 2024. "Building entrepreneurial resilience during crisis using generative AI: An empirical study on SMEs," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:277:y:2024:i:c:s0925527324002433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.