IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v268y2024ics0925527323003389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is localization better than globalization for sustainability? Evidence from the nutraceuticals industry for managing malnutrition in India

Author

Listed:
  • Chaurasia, Shailly
  • Pati, Rupesh Kumar
  • Padhi, Sidhartha S.
  • Gavirneni, Srinagesh

Abstract

The socioeconomic consequences of the worldwide burden of malnutrition are substantial, with long-term consequences for individuals, their families, and their countries. Despite being one of the world's greatest producers of various agricultural products, India has regularly performed poorly in the Global Hunger Index. The World Food Programme provides funds to deliver a nutraceutical product (Plumpy Nut) to malnourished children in Low- and Medium-Income Countries (LMIC). The cost of obtaining these items from the international market is high, and worldwide logistics contribute to pollution. Despite these efforts, there has been insufficient food to feed nearly 40% of malnourished children in India, owing to budget constraints. This research provides a linear programming model and the Augmented ε-Constraint Method for developing a sustainable nutraceutical network. The model examines whether localizing the availability of nutraceutical items, in comparison to global sourcing, might be a viable option for improved managing malnutrition in LMIC's. The findings illustrate that localization can lead to a significant reduction in both cost (50%) and greenhouse gas emissions (90%). In addition, localization leads to feeding increased number of malnourished children in the budget constraint environment. Localization can also lead to a reduction in lead time related to due import-related logistical delays. The study offers insights into various policy interventions for stakeholders such as the government, producers, malnourished children (consumers), and others, to reduce malnutrition, while contributing towards United Nations Sustainable Development Goals of Zero Hunger and Responsible Consumption-Production by 2030. We use a case study from India to validate the model.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaurasia, Shailly & Pati, Rupesh Kumar & Padhi, Sidhartha S. & Gavirneni, Srinagesh, 2024. "Is localization better than globalization for sustainability? Evidence from the nutraceuticals industry for managing malnutrition in India," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:268:y:2024:i:c:s0925527323003389
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.109106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527323003389
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.109106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. International Food Policy Research Institute, 2015. "Global Nutrition Report 2015: Actions and accountability to advance nutrition and sustainable development," IFPRI books, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), number 978-0-89629-883-5.
    2. Matthias Ehrgott, 2006. "A discussion of scalarization techniques for multiple objective integer programming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 343-360, October.
    3. Andreas Kretschmer & Stefan Spinler & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2014. "A School Feeding Supply Chain Framework: Critical Factors for Sustainable Program Design," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(6), pages 990-1001, June.
    4. Rosendo Castañón & Fco. Alberto Campos & Salvador Doménech Martínez & José Villar, 2020. "The Food Bank of Madrid: A Linear Model for Optimal Nutrition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2018. "Big Data Analytics for Rapid, Impactful, Sustained, and Efficient (RISE) Humanitarian Operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(9), pages 1696-1700, September.
    6. Peters, Koen & Fleuren, H.A. & den Hertog, Dick & Kavelj, Mirjana & Silva, Sergio & Goncalves, Rui & Ergun, Ozlem & Soldner, Mallory, 2016. "The Nutritious Supply Chain : Optimizing Humanitarian Food Aid," Discussion Paper 2016-044, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    7. Shyma Jose & Ashok Gulati & Kriti Khuran, 2020. "Achieving Nutritional Security in India: Vision 2030," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER) Report 20-r-05, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), New Delhi, India.
    8. Dekker, Rommert & Bloemhof, Jacqueline & Mallidis, Ioannis, 2012. "Operations Research for green logistics – An overview of aspects, issues, contributions and challenges," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 671-679.
    9. Rohmer, S.U.K. & Gerdessen, J.C. & Claassen, G.D.H., 2019. "Sustainable supply chain design in the food system with dietary considerations: A multi-objective analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 1149-1164.
    10. Soysal, M. & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.M. & van der Vorst, J.G.A.J., 2014. "Modelling food logistics networks with emission considerations: The case of an international beef supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 57-70.
    11. Martins, C.L. & Melo, M.T. & Pato, M.V., 2019. "Redesigning a food bank supply chain network in a triple bottom line context," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 234-247.
    12. Gemma Berenguer & Pinar Keskinocak & J. George Shanthikumar & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan & Luk Van Wassenhove & Karthik V. Natarajan & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2017. "Multi-Treatment Inventory Allocation in Humanitarian Health Settings under Funding Constraints," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(6), pages 1015-1034, June.
    13. Lamis Jomaa & Lara Nasreddine & Farah Naja & Lara Chehade & Nahla Hwalla, 2021. "Sustainable, Healthy and Affordable Diets for Children in Lebanon: A Call for Action in Dire Times," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Roberto Volpe & Simona Messineo & Maurizio Volpe & Antonio Messineo, 2015. "Carbon Footprint of Tree Nuts Based Consumer Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-18, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jónas Oddur Jónasson & Kamalini Ramdas & Alp Sungu, 2022. "Social impact operations at the global base of the pyramid," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4364-4378, December.
    2. Volha Yakavenka & Ioannis Mallidis & Dimitrios Vlachos & Eleftherios Iakovou & Zafeiriou Eleni, 2020. "Development of a multi-objective model for the design of sustainable supply chains: the case of perishable food products," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 593-621, November.
    3. Qian Dai & Jiaqi Yang & Dong Li, 2018. "Modeling a Three-Mode Hybrid Port-Hinterland Freight Intermodal Distribution Network with Environmental Consideration: The Case of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-26, August.
    4. Rafael Tordecilla-Madera & Andrés Polo & Adrián Cañón, 2018. "Vehicles Allocation for Fruit Distribution Considering CO 2 Emissions and Decisions on Subcontracting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, July.
    5. Najafi, Mehdi & Zolfagharinia, Hossein, 2024. "A Multi-objective integrated approach to address sustainability in a meat supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    6. Rohmer, S.U.K. & Gerdessen, J.C. & Claassen, G.D.H., 2019. "Sustainable supply chain design in the food system with dietary considerations: A multi-objective analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 1149-1164.
    7. Shoufeng Ji & Qi Sun, 2017. "Low-Carbon Planning and Design in B&R Logistics Service: A Case Study of an E-Commerce Big Data Platform in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-27, November.
    8. Aleksander Banasik & Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard & Argyris Kanellopoulos & G. D. H. Claassen & Jack G. A. J. Vorst, 2018. "Multi-criteria decision making approaches for green supply chains: a review," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 366-396, September.
    9. D. G. Mogale & Sri Krishna Kumar & Manoj Kumar Tiwari, 2020. "Green food supply chain design considering risk and post-harvest losses: a case study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 295(1), pages 257-284, December.
    10. Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula & da Silva, Cátia & Carvalho, Ana, 2018. "Opportunities and challenges in sustainable supply chain: An operations research perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 399-431.
    11. Saberi, Sara, 2018. "Sustainable, multiperiod supply chain network model with freight carrier through reduction in pollution stock," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 421-444.
    12. Chamari Pamoshika Jayarathna & Duzgun Agdas & Les Dawes & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2021. "Multi-Objective Optimization for Sustainable Supply Chain and Logistics: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-31, December.
    13. Nur Sunar & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2022. "Socially relevant and inclusive operations management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4379-4392, December.
    14. Wang, Haiyan & Zhan, Sha-lei & Ng, Chi To & Cheng, T.C.E., 2020. "Coordinating quality, time, and carbon emissions in perishable food production: A new technology integrating GERT and the Bayesian approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    15. McDonald, Conor M., 2016. "Integrating packaging and supply chain decisions: Selection of economic handling unit quantities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 208-221.
    16. Banasik, Aleksander & Kanellopoulos, Argyris & Claassen, G.D.H. & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, Jacqueline M. & van der Vorst, Jack G.A.J., 2017. "Closing loops in agricultural supply chains using multi-objective optimization: A case study of an industrial mushroom supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 409-420.
    17. Ulf Speer & Kathrin Fischer, 2017. "Scheduling of Different Automated Yard Crane Systems at Container Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 305-324, February.
    18. CHEN, Helen S.Y., 2020. "Designing Sustainable Humanitarian Supply Chains," OSF Preprints m82ar, Center for Open Science.
    19. Yi Wang & Yafei Yang & Zhaoxiang Qin & Yefei Yang & Jun Li, 2023. "A Literature Review on the Application of Digital Technology in Achieving Green Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Eunae Yoo & Elliot Rabinovich & Bin Gu, 2020. "The Growth of Follower Networks on Social Media Platforms for Humanitarian Operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(12), pages 2696-2715, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:268:y:2024:i:c:s0925527323003389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.