IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v265y2023ics0925527323002359.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supporting personalized new energy vehicle purchase decision-making: Customer reviews and product recommendation platform

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Zaoli
  • Li, Qin
  • Charles, Vincent
  • Xu, Bing
  • Gupta, Shivam

Abstract

The maturity of Industry 4.0 technologies such as the Internet of Things and cloud computing has accelerated the development of various platforms. In new energy vehicle (NEV) recommendation platforms, customer reviews have been well recognized for their ability to provide value-added information to customers interested in purchasing NEVs. However, the countless NEV reviews on recommendation platforms make it difficult for consumers to select their preferred NEV. The existing NEV recommendation platforms also do not automatically perform fine-grained sentiment analysis of the product attributes contained in reviews. Consequently, they cannot provide personalized purchase recommendations for consumers. To this end, this study aims to propose a product purchase decision support method based on sentiment analysis and multi-attribute decision-making to improve the accuracy of personalized NEV recommendation platforms. Sentiment analysis was conducted on the attribute reviews of NEVs on a product recommendation platform. Subsequently, the positive, negative, and neutral sentiment ratios obtained based on sentiment analysis were regarded as q-rung orthopair fuzzy numbers. The ratios were then recognized as cumulative prospect theory (CPT) inputs. The prospect values of each NEV under each attribute were calculated and further aggregated into a Muirhead mean operator to finally obtain the product rankings. This method was used to portray the consumers' decision-making process considering various situations and irrational psychological factors (e.g., risk-preference attitude). The results show that our proposal can recommend NEVs that are more consistent with consumers' personalized requirements. To conclude, our study can enhance the decision-making support capacity of product recommendation platforms by providing sentiment analysis and capturing customers’ preferences for product attributes. Additionally, it can recommend more suitable NEVs to meet personalized customer requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Zaoli & Li, Qin & Charles, Vincent & Xu, Bing & Gupta, Shivam, 2023. "Supporting personalized new energy vehicle purchase decision-making: Customer reviews and product recommendation platform," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:265:y:2023:i:c:s0925527323002359
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.109003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527323002359
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.109003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Junhui & Balaji, M.S. & Luo, Jun & Jha, Subhash, 2022. "Effectiveness of product recommendation framing on online retail platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 185-197.
    2. Hajek, Petr & Sahut, Jean-Michel, 2022. "Mining behavioural and sentiment-dependent linguistic patterns from restaurant reviews for fake review detection," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    3. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
    4. Juheng Zhang & Selwyn Piramuthu, 2018. "Product recommendation with latent review topics," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 617-625, June.
    5. Cui, Lixin & Wang, Yonggui & Chen, Weiming & Wen, Wen & Han, Myat Su, 2021. "Predicting determinants of consumers' purchase motivation for electric vehicles: An application of Maslow's hierarchy of needs model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    6. Debnath, Ramit & Bardhan, Ronita & Reiner, David M. & Miller, J.R., 2021. "Political, economic, social, technological, legal and environmental dimensions of electric vehicle adoption in the United States: A social-media interaction analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    7. Ji, Dandan & Gan, Hongcheng, 2022. "Effects of providing total cost of ownership information on below-40 young consumers’ intent to purchase an electric vehicle: A case study in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    8. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    9. Sun, Miao & Chen, Jing & Tian, Ye & Yan, Yufei, 2021. "The impact of online reviews in the presence of customer returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    10. Zhang, Min & Sun, Lin & Wang, G. Alan & Li, Yuzhuo & He, Shuguang, 2022. "Using neutral sentiment reviews to improve customer requirement identification and product design strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    11. Yin, WanJun & Wen, Tao & Zhang, Chao, 2023. "Cooperative optimal scheduling strategy of electric vehicles based on dynamic electricity price mechanism," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    12. Lin, Boqiang & Shi, Lei, 2022. "Do environmental quality and policy changes affect the evolution of consumers’ intentions to buy new energy vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    13. Leoneti, Alexandre Bevilacqua & Gomes, Luiz Flavio Autran Monteiro, 2021. "A novel version of the TODIM method based on the exponential model of prospect theory: The ExpTODIM method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 1042-1055.
    14. Simonetto, Marco & Sgarbossa, Fabio & Battini, Daria & Govindan, Kannan, 2022. "Closed loop supply chains 4.0: From risks to benefits through advanced technologies. A literature review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    15. Wu, Zhonghuan & Duan, Chunlin & Cui, Yuting & Qin, Rong, 2023. "Consumers' attitudes toward low-carbon consumption based on a computational model: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    16. Tseng, Ming-Lang & Bui, Tat-Dat & Lan, Shulin & Lim, Ming K. & Mashud, Abu Hashan Md, 2021. "Smart product service system hierarchical model in banking industry under uncertainties," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    17. Gao, Yongling & Leng, Mingming & Zhang, Yaping & Liang, Liping, 2022. "Incentivizing the adoption of electric vehicles in city logistics: Pricing, driving range, and usage decisions under time window policies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    18. Jiménez, Fernando R. & Mendoza, Norma A., 2013. "Too Popular to Ignore: The Influence of Online Reviews on Purchase Intentions of Search and Experience Products," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 226-235.
    19. Su, Dan & Zhang, Lijun & Peng, Hua & Saeidi, Parvaneh & Tirkolaee, Erfan Babaee, 2023. "Technical challenges of blockchain technology for sustainable manufacturing paradigm in Industry 4.0 era using a fuzzy decision support system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    20. Upadhyay, Nitin & Kamble, Aakash, 2023. "Examining Indian consumer pro-environment purchase intention of electric vehicles: Perspective of stimulus-organism-response," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    21. Xiaosong Ren & Sha Sun & Rong Yuan, 2021. "A Study on Selection Strategies for Battery Electric Vehicles Based on Sentiments, Analysis, and the MCDM Model," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-23, August.
    22. Zhang, Linda L., 2015. "A literature review on multitype platforming and framework for future research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1-12.
    23. Youngsoo Kim & Ramayya Krishnan, 2015. "On Product-Level Uncertainty and Online Purchase Behavior: An Empirical Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(10), pages 2449-2467, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leoneti, Alexandre Bevilacqua & Gomes, Luiz Flavio Autran Monteiro, 2021. "Modeling multicriteria group decision making as games from enhanced pairwise comparisons," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 8(C).
    2. Kubińska, Elżbieta & Adamczyk-Kowalczuk, Magdalena & Andrzejewski, Mariusz & Rozakis, Stelios, 2022. "Incorporating the status quo effect into the decision making process: The case of municipal companies merger," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    3. van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. & Botzen, W.J.W., 2015. "Monetary valuation of the social cost of CO2 emissions: A critical survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 33-46.
    4. Shoji, Isao & Kanehiro, Sumei, 2016. "Disposition effect as a behavioral trading activity elicited by investors' different risk preferences," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 104-112.
    5. Jonathan Meng & Feng Fu, 2020. "Understanding Gambling Behavior and Risk Attitudes Using Cryptocurrency-based Casino Blockchain Data," Papers 2008.05653, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    6. Daniel Fonseca Costa & Francisval Carvalho & Bruno César Moreira & José Willer Prado, 2017. "Bibliometric analysis on the association between behavioral finance and decision making with cognitive biases such as overconfidence, anchoring effect and confirmation bias," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1775-1799, June.
    7. Boone, Jan & Sadrieh, Abdolkarim & van Ours, Jan C., 2009. "Experiments on unemployment benefit sanctions and job search behavior," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 937-951, November.
    8. Castro, Luciano de & Galvao, Antonio F. & Kim, Jeong Yeol & Montes-Rojas, Gabriel & Olmo, Jose, 2022. "Experiments on portfolio selection: A comparison between quantile preferences and expected utility decision models," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    9. Jos'e Cl'audio do Nascimento, 2019. "Behavioral Biases and Nonadditive Dynamics in Risk Taking: An Experimental Investigation," Papers 1908.01709, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    10. Francesco GUALA, 2017. "Preferences: Neither Behavioural nor Mental," Departmental Working Papers 2017-05, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    11. Bin Zou, 2017. "Optimal Investment In Hedge Funds Under Loss Aversion," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-32, May.
    12. Itzhak Gilboa & Andrew Postlewaite & Larry Samuelson & David Schmeidler, 2019. "What are axiomatizations good for?," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 86(3), pages 339-359, May.
    13. Wiafe, Osei K. & Basu, Anup K. & Chen, En Te, 2020. "Portfolio choice after retirement: Should self-annuitisation strategies hold more equities?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 241-255.
    14. Nicholas Barberis, 2012. "A Model of Casino Gambling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(1), pages 35-51, January.
    15. Lovric, M. & Kaymak, U. & Spronk, J., 2008. "A Conceptual Model of Investor Behavior," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2008-030-F&A, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    16. Goytom Abraha Kahsay & Daniel Osberghaus, 2018. "Storm Damage and Risk Preferences: Panel Evidence from Germany," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(1), pages 301-318, September.
    17. Carolin Bock & Maximilian Schmidt, 2015. "Should I stay, or should I go? – How fund dynamics influence venture capital exit decisions," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 68-82, November.
    18. Hooi Hooi Lean & Michael McAleer & Wing-Keung Wong, 2013. "Risk-averse and Risk-seeking Investor Preferences for Oil Spot and Futures," Documentos de Trabajo del ICAE 2013-31, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico, revised Aug 2013.
    19. Paredes-Frigolett, Harold, 2016. "Modeling the effect of responsible research and innovation in quadruple helix innovation systems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 126-133.
    20. Karle, Heiko & Schumacher, Heiner & Vølund, Rune, 2023. "Consumer loss aversion and scale-dependent psychological switching costs," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 214-237.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:265:y:2023:i:c:s0925527323002359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.