IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v257y2023ics0925527323000099.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Authorization or encroachment: Effects of channel encroachment on decisions and performance in software service supply chains

Author

Listed:
  • Ren, Ting-hai
  • Zeng, Neng-min
  • Wang, Da-fei
  • Yuan, Kai-fu

Abstract

At present, plenty of software developers not only sell their software to client firms through downstream service integrators, but also vend it to clients directly. However, little research has been investigated software developers' channel encroachment in the area of software service supply chain (SSSC) management. In this study, we examine a SSSC with a developer, an integrator, and client firms. Clients can either purchase software from the integrator at high prices and with accessorial pre-sale services, or procure it directly from the developer at low prices but with no pre-sale services. After purchasing software, clients can also purchase the extended warranty service (EWS) from the developer. We investigated the two cooperation modes, i.e., the “Authorization” (marked as mode A) and the “Authorization + direct sales” (marked as mode E), and analyzed effects of the developer's channel encroachment on equilibrium decisions of SSSC members and on SSSC performance. It is shown that both the sensitivity of clients to the EWS price and the EWS cost cannot affect the software pricing decision of the integrator in the mode A, but those can affect that in the mode E. Furthermore, when the EWS cost is high, although the developer can obtain the software authorization revenue, the software sales revenue, and the EWS sales revenue (in the mode E), its channel encroachment will unexpectedly cause its own profit to decline. We also find that if the developer participates in the competition with low intensity, its encroachment is detrimental to both parties; only when the developer participates in the competition with high intensity and has a low-cost advantage, its encroachment can increase its own profit, but it may reduce the profit of the integrator and lead to a decrease in the total SSSC profit. However, we are surprised to find that if the developer participates in the competition with high intensity and its EWS cost is high, its channel encroachment not only increases the integrator's profit but also the total SSSC performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Ren, Ting-hai & Zeng, Neng-min & Wang, Da-fei & Yuan, Kai-fu, 2023. "Authorization or encroachment: Effects of channel encroachment on decisions and performance in software service supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:257:y:2023:i:c:s0925527323000099
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108777
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527323000099
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108777?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gérard P. Cachon & Martin A. Lariviere, 1999. "Capacity Allocation Using Past Sales: When to Turn-and-Earn," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(5), pages 685-703, May.
    2. Kalyan Singhal & Qi Feng & Ram Ganeshan & Nada R. Sanders & J. George Shanthikumar, 2018. "Introduction to the Special Issue on Perspectives on Big Data," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(9), pages 1639-1641, September.
    3. Yeon-Koo Che & Ian Gale, 2003. "Optimal Design of Research Contests," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(3), pages 646-671, June.
    4. Chen, Mengmiao & Hu, Qiying & Wei, Hang, 2017. "Interaction of after-sales service provider and contract type in a supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 514-527.
    5. Andy A. Tsay & Narendra Agrawal, 2000. "Channel Dynamics Under Price and Service Competition," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 2(4), pages 372-391, August.
    6. Wang, Yulan & Wallace, Stein W. & Shen, Bin & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2015. "Service supply chain management: A review of operational models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 685-698.
    7. Xianpei Hong & Lan Wang & Yeming Gong & Wanying (Amanda) Chen, 2020. "What is the role of value-added service in a remanufacturing closed-loop supply chain?," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(11), pages 3342-3361, June.
    8. Guan, Zili & Zhang, Xumei & Zhou, Maosen & Dan, Yiran, 2020. "Demand information sharing in competing supply chains with manufacturer-provided service," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    9. Zhuoxin Li & Stephen M. Gilbert & Guoming Lai, 2014. "Supplier Encroachment Under Asymmetric Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(2), pages 449-462, February.
    10. Kunpeng Li & Yang Li & Qiannong Gu & Alicia Ingersoll, 2019. "Joint effects of remanufacturing channel design and after-sales service pricing: an analytical study," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(4), pages 1066-1081, February.
    11. X. Tang & S. Fang & F. Cheng, 2014. "Strategic interactions in service supply chain with horizontal competition," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(2), pages 469-488, July.
    12. Ehsan Bolandifar & Panos Kouvelis & Fuqiang Zhang, 2016. "Delegation vs. Control in Supply Chain Procurement under Competition," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(9), pages 1528-1541, September.
    13. Fernando Bernstein & Awi Federgruen, 2007. "Coordination Mechanisms for Supply Chains Under Price and Service Competition," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 242-262, January.
    14. Danqin Yang & Tiaojun Xiao, 2017. "Coordination of a supply chain with loss-averse consumers in service quality," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(12), pages 3411-3430, June.
    15. Wenqiang Xiao & Yi Xu, 2012. "The Impact of Royalty Contract Revision in a Multistage Strategic R&D Alliance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(12), pages 2251-2271, December.
    16. Song Huang & Xu Guan & Ying†Ju Chen, 2018. "Retailer Information Sharing with Supplier Encroachment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(6), pages 1133-1147, June.
    17. Xiao, Tiaojun & Yang, Danqin, 2008. "Price and service competition of supply chains with risk-averse retailers under demand uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 187-200, July.
    18. Chen, Xu & Li, Ling & Zhou, Ming, 2012. "Manufacturer's pricing strategy for supply chain with warranty period-dependent demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 807-816.
    19. Chen, Jingxian & Liang, Liang & Yao, Dong-qing, 2019. "Factory encroachment and channel selection in an outsourced supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 73-83.
    20. Qi Feng & J. George Shanthikumar, 2018. "How Research in Production and Operations Management May Evolve in the Era of Big Data," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(9), pages 1670-1684, September.
    21. B. C. Giri & B. R. Sarker, 2016. "Coordinating a two-echelon supply chain under production disruption when retailers compete with price and service level," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 71-88, April.
    22. Chen, Xu & Wan, Nana & Wang, Xiaojun, 2017. "Flexibility and coordination in a supply chain with bidirectional option contracts and service requirement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 183-192.
    23. Xue, Musen & Zhang, Jianxiong & Zhu, Guowei, 2020. "Quantity decision timing with spillover effect and asymmetric demand information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    24. Kurata, Hisashi & Nam, Seong-Hyun, 2013. "After-sales service competition in a supply chain: Does uncertainty affect the conflict between profit maximization and customer satisfaction?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 268-280.
    25. C. Gizem Korpeoglu & Ersin Körpeoğlu & Soo-Haeng Cho, 2020. "Supply Chain Competition: A Market Game Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 5648-5664, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fang, Chang & Fan, Shuyi & Chi, Mingxiang & Wang, Weizhong, 2023. "The optimal remanufacturing strategy, returned quality choice and independent remanufacturers’ advantage for tackling extreme weather," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    2. Ma, Xiaoyu & Huang, Feiteng & Li, Xue & Zhang, Jihong, 2024. "Optimal contract design in mobile service industry considering network congestion," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yulan & Wallace, Stein W. & Shen, Bin & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2015. "Service supply chain management: A review of operational models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 685-698.
    2. Guan, Zili & Zhang, Xumei & Zhou, Maosen & Dan, Yiran, 2020. "Demand information sharing in competing supply chains with manufacturer-provided service," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    3. Renbang Shan & Li Luo & Baoli Shi, 2023. "The choice of recycling strategies for decision-makers based on government subsidy and service budget," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1441-1472, February.
    4. Wu, Cheng-Han, 2012. "Price and service competition between new and remanufactured products in a two-echelon supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 496-507.
    5. Hu, Yihong & Qu, Shengnan & Li, Guo & Sethi, Suresh P., 2021. "Power structure and channel integration strategy for online retailers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(3), pages 951-964.
    6. Wei, Jie & Chang, Meijing, 2023. "Are price matching and logistics service enhancement always effective strategies for improving profitability?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(1), pages 103-115.
    7. Bian, Yiwen & Wang, Hang & Yan, Shuai & Han, Xiaohua, 2024. "Platform channel strategy of selling format: Effect of asymmetric service information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    8. Luo, Huajiang & Niu, Baozhuang, 2022. "Impact of competition type on a competitive manufacturer's preference of decision timing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    9. H. Neil Geismar & Yiwei Huang & Suresh D. Pillai & Chelliah Sriskandarajah & Seokjun Youn, 2020. "Location‐Routing with Conflicting Objectives: Coordinating eBeam Phytosanitary Treatment and Distribution of Mexican Import Commodities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(6), pages 1506-1531, June.
    10. Jixiang Zhang & Chen Zhu, 2020. "Research on the Dynamic Pricing and Service Decisions in the Reverse Supply Chain considering Consumers’ Service Sensitivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    11. Seyed Jafar Sadjadi & Hashem Asadi & Ramin Sadeghian & Hadi Sahebi, 2018. "Retailer Stackelberg game in a supply chain with pricing and service decisions and simple price discount contract," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, April.
    12. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Rezapour, Shabnam & Drezner, Tammy & Fallah, Samira, 2014. "Competitive supply chain network design: An overview of classifications, models, solution techniques and applications," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 92-118.
    13. Chen, Xu & Luo, Zheng & Wang, Xiaojun, 2019. "Compete or cooperate: Intensity, dynamics, and optimal strategies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 76-86.
    14. Syed Asif Raza, 2022. "A bibliometric analysis of pricing models in supply chain," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(2), pages 228-251, April.
    15. Wang, Wei & Feng, Lipan & Li, Yongjian & Xu, Fangchao & Deng, Qianzhou, 2020. "Role of financial leasing in a capital-constrained service supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    16. Qian, Li, 2014. "Market-based supplier selection with price, delivery time, and service level dependent demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PC), pages 697-706.
    17. Lou, Yaqi & Feng, Lipan & He, Shuguang & He, Zhen & Zhao, Xiukun, 2020. "Logistics service outsourcing choices in a retailer-led supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    18. Rezapour, Shabnam & Hassani, Ashkan & Farahani, Reza Zanjirani, 2015. "Concurrent design of product family and supply chain network considering quality and price," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 18-35.
    19. Wang, Qingwei & Zheng, Meimei & Lee, Ka-Man & Shi, Xiaoqian & Shen, Yichi & Pan, Ershun, 2024. "Optimal product and after-sales service decisions considering risk attitudes under price-dependent uncertain demand," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    20. LIN, Feng & QIN, Xibei & PU, Xujin & ZHU, Weiwei & ZHUO, Xingxuan, 2021. "Effects of in-house production on channel structures in a co-opetitive supply chain under supply uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:257:y:2023:i:c:s0925527323000099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.