IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v242y2021ics092552732100270x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Committed or contingent? The retailer’s information acquisition and sharing strategies when confronting manufacturer encroachment

Author

Listed:
  • Hu, Huaqing
  • Sun, Shuxiao
  • Zheng, Xiaona
  • Chen, Lihua
  • Huang, Tao

Abstract

Unlike most studies focusing on the manufacturer’s channel strategy, we investigate how a retailer strategically acquires and shares consumer quality preference information when confronting manufacturer encroachment. As a follower, the manufacturer decides the quality level and sales quantity based on the information he holds. Considering the retailer’s flexibility in acquisition timing, we focus on two formats, namely committed acquisition and contingent acquisition, depending on whether the retailer commits to her acquisition decision before or after the manufacturer’s quality investment. Assuming the manufacturer provides identical product through different selling channels, we find that when the manufacturer’s direct selling efficiency is high, contingent acquisition is always a weakly dominant strategy, while the retailer is suggested to commit to acquire information if and only if the direct selling efficiency is low and the acquisition cost is relatively high. If the consumer quality preference is acquired, information sharing occurs only when the direct selling efficiency is sufficiently high, via which the retailer can induce a lower expected wholesale price, gain a higher market share, and achieve a “win-win” situation. With the information advantage, the retailer can always obtain a positive profit in the distribution channel, while the inefficient manufacturer may stop selling in the direct channel when consumers have a low preference for quality. Our result explains why, despite manufacturers directly obtain profits from their own channels, they still sell products through retail channels and even treat them as main distributive ways. Based on the above equilibrium outcomes, we derive the retailer’s optimal strategy for information management, whereby the retailer can not only induce the highest product quality, but also the highest consumer surplus as compared to other acquisition strategies. Our work can guide retailers to better implement information strategies when confronting manufacturer encroachment.

Suggested Citation

  • Hu, Huaqing & Sun, Shuxiao & Zheng, Xiaona & Chen, Lihua & Huang, Tao, 2021. "Committed or contingent? The retailer’s information acquisition and sharing strategies when confronting manufacturer encroachment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:242:y:2021:i:c:s092552732100270x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092552732100270X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108294?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Yan & Shi, Hongyan & Petruzzi, Nicholas C., 2018. "Optimal quality and quantity provisions for centralized vs. decentralized distribution: Market size uncertainty effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 1144-1158.
    2. Guan, Xu & Mantrala, Murali & Bian, Yiwen, 2019. "Strategic information management in a distribution channel," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 42-56.
    3. Ma, Peng & Wang, Haiyan & Shang, Jennifer, 2013. "Supply chain channel strategies with quality and marketing effort-dependent demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 572-581.
    4. Liang Guo & Ganesh Iyer, 2010. "Information Acquisition and Sharing in a Vertical Relationship," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 483-506, 05-06.
    5. Cai, Gangshu (George) & Zhang, Zhe George & Zhang, Michael, 2009. "Game theoretical perspectives on dual-channel supply chain competition with price discounts and pricing schemes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 80-96, January.
    6. Huan Cao & Xu Guan & Tijun Fan & Li Zhou, 2020. "The Acquisition of Quality Information in a Supply Chain with Voluntary vs. Mandatory Disclosure," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(3), pages 595-616, March.
    7. Wei-yu Kevin Chiang & Dilip Chhajed & James D. Hess, 2003. "Direct Marketing, Indirect Profits: A Strategic Analysis of Dual-Channel Supply-Chain Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(1), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Huang, Qinghua & Yang, Shilei & Shi, Victor & Zhang, Yibin, 2018. "Strategic decentralization under sequential channel structure and quality choices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 70-78.
    9. Liang Guo, 2009. "The Benefits of Downstream Information Acquisition," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 457-471, 05-06.
    10. Economides, Nicholas, 1999. "Quality choice and vertical integration," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 903-914, August.
    11. Jabarzare, Nahid & Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza, 2020. "A game theoretic approach for pricing and determining quality level through coordination contracts in a dual-channel supply chain including manufacturer and packaging company," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    12. Gérard P. Cachon & Marshall Fisher, 2000. "Supply Chain Inventory Management and the Value of Shared Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(8), pages 1032-1048, August.
    13. Zhuoxin Li & Stephen M. Gilbert & Guoming Lai, 2014. "Supplier Encroachment Under Asymmetric Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(2), pages 449-462, February.
    14. Zhuoxin Li & Stephen M. Gilbert & Guoming Lai, 2015. "Supplier Encroachment as an Enhancement or a Hindrance to Nonlinear Pricing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(1), pages 89-109, January.
    15. Abel P. Jeuland & Steven M. Shugan, 1983. "Managing Channel Profits," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 239-272.
    16. Xu Guan & Ying‐Ju Chen, 2016. "Timing of information acquisition in a competitive environment," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(1), pages 3-22, February.
    17. Huang, Hongfu & He, Yong & Chen, Jing, 2019. "Competitive strategies and quality to counter parallel importation in global market," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 173-197.
    18. Sun, Xiaojie & Tang, Wansheng & Chen, Jing & Li, Sa & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2019. "Manufacturer encroachment with production cost reduction under asymmetric information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 191-211.
    19. Xiao, Lei & Xu, Minghui & Zheng, Jun-Jun & Huang, Song, 2020. "Inducing manufacturer’s quality enhancement via retailer’s acquisition strategy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    20. Charles J. Corbett & Xavier de Groote, 2000. "A Supplier's Optimal Quantity Discount Policy Under Asymmetric Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 444-450, March.
    21. Zhang, Shichen & Zhang, Jianxiong & Zhu, Guowei, 2019. "Retail service investing: An anti-encroachment strategy in a retailer-led supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 212-231.
    22. In-Koo Cho & David M. Kreps, 1987. "Signaling Games and Stable Equilibria," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 102(2), pages 179-221.
    23. Shibata, Takashi & Nishihara, Michi, 2011. "Interactions between investment timing and management effort under asymmetric information: Costs and benefits of privatized firms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(3), pages 688-696, December.
    24. Wang, Sujuan & Hu, Qiying & Liu, Weiqi, 2017. "Price and quality-based competition and channel structure with consumer loyalty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 563-574.
    25. Song Huang & Xu Guan & Ying†Ju Chen, 2018. "Retailer Information Sharing with Supplier Encroachment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(6), pages 1133-1147, June.
    26. Zhang, Jianxiong & Li, Sa & Zhang, Shichen & Dai, Rui, 2019. "Manufacturer encroachment with quality decision under asymmetric demand information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 217-236.
    27. Brian Mittendorf & Jiwoong Shin & Dae-Hee Yoon, 2013. "Manufacturer marketing initiatives and retailer information sharing," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 263-287, June.
    28. Anil Arya & Brian Mittendorf & David E. M. Sappington, 2007. "The Bright Side of Supplier Encroachment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 651-659, 09-10.
    29. Lode Li, 2002. "Information Sharing in a Supply Chain with Horizontal Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(9), pages 1196-1212, September.
    30. Zhou, Jianheng & Zhao, Ruijuan & Wang, Weishen, 2019. "Pricing decision of a manufacturer in a dual-channel supply chain with asymmetric information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 809-820.
    31. Brian Mittendorf & Jiwoong Shin & Dae-Hee Yoon, 2013. "Manufacturer marketing initiatives and retailer information sharing," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 263-287, June.
    32. Chen, Xi & Zhang, Hui & Zhang, Michael & Chen, Jing, 2017. "Optimal decisions in a retailer Stackelberg supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 260-270.
    33. Arya, Anil & Mittendorf, Brian, 2013. "Discretionary disclosure in the presence of dual distribution channels," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 168-182.
    34. Chen, Jingxian & Liang, Liang & Yao, Dong-Qing & Sun, Shengnan, 2017. "Price and quality decisions in dual-channel supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 935-948.
    35. Albert Y. Ha & Quan Tian & Shilu Tong, 2017. "Information Sharing in Competing Supply Chains with Production Cost Reduction," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 246-262, May.
    36. Albert Y. Ha & Shilu Tong, 2008. "Contracting and Information Sharing Under Supply Chain Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 701-715, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luo, Huajiang & Niu, Baozhuang, 2022. "Impact of competition type on a competitive manufacturer's preference of decision timing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    2. Weidong Zhang & Fuqiang Wang, 2022. "Information Sharing in Competing Supply Chains with Carbon Emissions Reduction Incentives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-25, October.
    3. Pei, Zhi & Ghose, Sanjoy & Yan, Ruiliang & Zhou, Steve B. & Yan, Angela, 2024. "The strategic value of buy online and pick up from store service to the dual channel coordination," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Mao, Zhaofang & Han, Yuqing & Liang, Zhengbo, 2022. "Mode of store-brand introduction and contracting sequence under manufacturer encroachment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Song & Zhang, Xianmei & Chen, Shuting, 2021. "Information acquisition with advertising threshold effect under manufacturer encroachment in a supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    2. Zhang, Shichen & Wei, Liqun & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2022. "Demand forecast sharing for a dominant retailer with supplier encroachment and quality decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 39-50.
    3. Song Huang & Shuting Chen & Lei Xiao, 2020. "Manufacturer product quality information disclosure with channel encroachment in the E‐commerce age," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(5), pages 744-761, July.
    4. Guan, Xu & Huang, Song & Chen, Ying-Ju, 2022. "Acquisition transparency and induced supplier encroachment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    5. Xue, Musen & Zhang, Jianxiong & Zhu, Guowei, 2020. "Quantity decision timing with spillover effect and asymmetric demand information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    6. Tong, Yang & Lu, Tao & Li, Yina & Ye, Fei, 2023. "Encroachment by a better-informed manufacturer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1113-1129.
    7. Chen, Jing & Pun, Hubert & Zhang, Qiao, 2023. "Eliminate demand information disadvantage in a supplier encroachment supply chain with information acquisition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(2), pages 659-673.
    8. Yushi Tsunoda & Yusuke Zennyo, 2021. "Platform Information Transparency and Effects on Third‐Party Suppliers and Offline Retailers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4219-4235, November.
    9. Sun, Xiaojie & Tang, Wansheng & Zhang, Jianxiong & Chen, Jing, 2021. "The impact of quantity-based cost decline on supplier encroachment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    10. Yao, Yao & Zhang, Jianxiong & Fan, Xiaoqing, 2022. "Strategic pricing: An anti-encroachment policy of retailer with uncertainty in retail service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 144-157.
    11. Matsui, Kenji, 2020. "Optimal bargaining timing of a wholesale price for a manufacturer with a retailer in a dual-channel supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 225-236.
    12. Li, Jin & Hu, Zening & Shi, Victor & Wang, Qian, 2021. "Manufacturer's encroachment strategy with substitutable green products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    13. Long Gao & Liang Guo & Adem Orsdemir, 2021. "Dual‐Channel Distribution: The Case for Cost Information Asymmetry," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(2), pages 494-521, February.
    14. Zhang, Ting & Feng, Xiaohui & Wang, Ningning, 2021. "Manufacturer encroachment and product assortment under vertical differentiation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 120-132.
    15. Guo Li & Lin Tian & Hong Zheng, 2021. "Information Sharing in an Online Marketplace with Co‐opetitive Sellers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3713-3734, October.
    16. Sun, Xiaojie & Tang, Wansheng & Chen, Jing & Li, Sa & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2019. "Manufacturer encroachment with production cost reduction under asymmetric information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 191-211.
    17. Zheng, Hong & Li, Guo & Guan, Xu & Sethi, Suresh & Li, Yu, 2021. "Downstream information sharing and sales channel selection in a platform economy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    18. Albert Y. Ha & Huajiang Luo & Weixin Shang, 2022. "Supplier Encroachment, Information Sharing, and Channel Structure in Online Retail Platforms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1235-1251, March.
    19. Matsui, Kenji, 2024. "Should competing suppliers with dual-channel supply chains adopt agency selling in an e-commerce platform?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 587-604.
    20. Mandal, Prasenjit & Jain, Tarun, 2021. "Partial outsourcing from a rival: Quality decision under product differentiation and information asymmetry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 886-908.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:242:y:2021:i:c:s092552732100270x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.