IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v237y2021ics0925527321001134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heuristics for setting reorder levels in periodic review inventory systems with an aggregate service constraint

Author

Listed:
  • van Donselaar, Karel
  • Broekmeulen, Rob
  • de Kok, Ton

Abstract

Inventory managers are responsible for the trade-off between inventory holding costs and customer service. In this paper we consider a periodic review multi-item inventory system with exogenous lot-sizes and backordering. The objective is to minimize the total inventory holding costs subject to the constraint that the aggregate fill rate should be at least equal to a target level. The aggregate fill rate is a weighted average of the fill rates of all items in the assortment. We consider three ways of defining this aggregate fill rate: using generic weights, weights based on the average demand (volume) or weights based on the average (monetary) turnover. We show that the definition of the aggregate service can have huge effects on the performance of the system. So, inventory managers should be very careful on which definition to apply. We also derive four heuristics to determine the reorder levels for all items. One heuristic is very generic and can be applied to many problems including multi-item multi-echelon inventory systems and systems with a constrained aggregate ready rate. Since multiple assumptions made to derive the heuristics are common assumptions made in the literature, we first test the accuracy of these approximations using simulation. Next, we evaluate the heuristics based on data from a large international reseller. The heuristic based on the most accurate approximation performs best, is close to optimal and very efficient. Savings compared to no service level differentiation are large (up to 28.7%) and depend on the definition of the aggregate service.

Suggested Citation

  • van Donselaar, Karel & Broekmeulen, Rob & de Kok, Ton, 2021. "Heuristics for setting reorder levels in periodic review inventory systems with an aggregate service constraint," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:237:y:2021:i:c:s0925527321001134
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527321001134
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108137?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wallace J. Hopp & Mark L. Spearman & Rachel Q. Zhang, 1997. "Easily Implementable Inventory Control Policies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 327-340, June.
    2. de Kok, Ton, 2018. "Inventory Management: Modeling Real-life Supply Chains and Empirical Validity," Foundations and Trends(R) in Technology, Information and Operations Management, now publishers, vol. 11(2), pages 343-437, April.
    3. Millstein, Mitchell A. & Yang, Liu & Li, Haitao, 2014. "Optimizing ABC inventory grouping decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 71-80.
    4. De Schrijver, Steven K. & Aghezzaf, El-Houssaine & Vanmaele, Hendrik, 2013. "Aggregate constrained inventory systems with independent multi-product demand: Control practices and theoretical limitations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 416-423.
    5. Everette S. Gardner, Jr. & David G. Dannenbring, 1979. "Using Optimal Policy Surfaces to Analyze Aggregate Inventory Tradeoffs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(8), pages 709-720, August.
    6. Teunter, R.H. & Syntetos, A.A. & Babai, M.Z., 2017. "Stock keeping unit fill rate specification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 917-925.
    7. D. A. Schrady & U. C. Choe, 1971. "Models for multi‐item continuous review inventory policies subject to constraints," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 451-463, December.
    8. Albrecht, Martin, 2017. "Optimization of safety stocks in models with an order service level objective or constraint," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 900-909.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Priyan, S. & Matahen, Reem & Priyanshu, Deepa & Mouqdadi, Mahera, 2024. "Environmental strategies for a healthcare system with green technology investment and pandemic effects," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(1).
    2. Sun, Yimeng & Qiu, Ruozhen & Sun, Minghe, 2024. "A robust optimization approach for inventory management with limited-time discounts and service-level requirement under demand uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Yimeng & Qiu, Ruozhen & Sun, Minghe, 2024. "A robust optimization approach for inventory management with limited-time discounts and service-level requirement under demand uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    2. De Schrijver, Steven K. & Aghezzaf, El-Houssaine & Vanmaele, Hendrik, 2013. "Aggregate constrained inventory systems with independent multi-product demand: Control practices and theoretical limitations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 416-423.
    3. Bikash Koli Dey & Hyesung Seok, 2024. "Intelligent inventory management with autonomation and service strategy," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 307-330, January.
    4. S. Rajagopalan, 2002. "Make to Order or Make to Stock: Model and Application," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(2), pages 241-256, February.
    5. Ye, Yuan & Lu, Yonggang & Robinson, Powell & Narayanan, Arunachalam, 2022. "An empirical Bayes approach to incorporating demand intermittency and irregularity into inventory control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 255-272.
    6. Soumya Kanti Hota & Biswajit Sarkar & Santanu Kumar Ghosh, 2020. "Effects of Unequal Lot Size and Variable Transportation in Unreliable Supply Chain Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Sheikh-Zadeh, Alireza & Rossetti, Manuel D. & Scott, Marc A., 2021. "Performance-based inventory classification methods for large-Scale multi-echelon replenishment systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    8. Vinayak Deshpande & Morris A. Cohen & Karen Donohue, 2003. "An Empirical Study of Service Differentiation for Weapon System Service Parts," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 518-530, August.
    9. A A Syntetos & J E Boylan & S M Disney, 2009. "Forecasting for inventory planning: a 50-year review," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 149-160, May.
    10. Relph, Geoff & Barrar, Peter, 2003. "Overage inventory--how does it occur and why is it important?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 163-171, January.
    11. Al-Rifai, Mohammad H. & Rossetti, Manuel D., 2007. "An efficient heuristic optimization algorithm for a two-echelon (R, Q) inventory system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(1-2), pages 195-213, September.
    12. Tamer Boyacı & Guillermo Gallego, 2002. "Managing waiting times of backordered demands in single‐stage (Q, r) inventory systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(6), pages 557-573, September.
    13. Achkar, Victoria G. & Brunaud, Braulio B. & Pérez, Héctor D. & Musa, Rami & Méndez, Carlos A. & Grossmann, Ignacio E., 2024. "Extensions to the guaranteed service model for industrial applications of multi-echelon inventory optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(1), pages 192-206.
    14. Sisi Wu & Yelin Fu & K. K. Lai & W. K. John Leung, 2018. "A Weighted Least-Square Dissimilarity Approach for Multiple Criteria ABC Inventory Classification," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(04), pages 1-12, August.
    15. Topan, Engin & Bayındır, Z. Pelin & Tan, Tarkan, 2017. "Heuristics for multi-item two-echelon spare parts inventory control subject to aggregate and individual service measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 126-138.
    16. Yang, Liu & Li, Haitao & Campbell, James F. & Sweeney, Donald C., 2017. "Integrated multi-period dynamic inventory classification and control," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 86-96.
    17. Koen W. de Bock & Kristof Coussement & Arno De Caigny & Roman Slowiński & Bart Baesens & Robert N Boute & Tsan-Ming Choi & Dursun Delen & Mathias Kraus & Stefan Lessmann & Sebastián Maldonado & David , 2023. "Explainable AI for Operational Research: A Defining Framework, Methods, Applications, and a Research Agenda," Post-Print hal-04219546, HAL.
    18. Andan Anjani & Adirizal Nizar, 2021. "Inventory management and cost efficiency:A case study in medical devices distributor," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(2), pages 217-227, March.
    19. Snoeck, André & Winkenbach, Matthias & Fransoo, Jan C., 2023. "On-demand last-mile distribution network design with omnichannel inventory," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    20. Tsou, Ching-Shih, 2009. "Evolutionary Pareto optimizers for continuous review stochastic inventory systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(2), pages 364-371, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:237:y:2021:i:c:s0925527321001134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.