IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v170y2015ipcp815-824.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust material handling system design with standard deviation, variance and downside risk as risk measures

Author

Listed:
  • Mital, Pratik
  • Goetschalckx, Marc
  • Huang, Edward

Abstract

The design and planning of major storage systems belong to the class of systems design problems under uncertainty. The overall structure of the system is determined during the design stage while the values of the future conditions and the future planning decisions are not known with certainty. Typically the future uncertainty is modeled through a number of scenarios and each scenario has an individual time-discounted total system cost. The overall performance of the material handling system (MHS) is characterized by the distribution of these scenario costs. The central tendency of the cost distribution is always computed as the expected value of the distribution. Several alternatives for the dispersion of the distribution can be used. In this study the standard deviation, variance, and the downside risk of the cost distribution are investigated as the risk measures of the system. We propose an algorithm to efficiently identify all configurations of the MHS that are Pareto-optimal with respect to the tradeoff between the expected value of the costs and the risk; such Pareto-optimal configurations are also called efficient. Although the MHS model has non-linear constraints, our proposed algorithm can solve such non-linear models taking into account both the expected costs and the risk. The final selection of the storage system for implementation can then be made based on the Pareto graph and other considerations such as the risk preferences of the system owner. The algorithms developed are illustrated through a case study which helps in developing business insights for the warehouse and MHS design planners and decision makers.

Suggested Citation

  • Mital, Pratik & Goetschalckx, Marc & Huang, Edward, 2015. "Robust material handling system design with standard deviation, variance and downside risk as risk measures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PC), pages 815-824.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:170:y:2015:i:pc:p:815-824
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.02.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527315000377
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.02.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harry Markowitz, 1952. "Portfolio Selection," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 7(1), pages 77-91, March.
    2. Fishburn, Peter C, 1977. "Mean-Risk Analysis with Risk Associated with Below-Target Returns," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 67(2), pages 116-126, March.
    3. Gu, Jinxiang & Goetschalckx, Marc & McGinnis, Leon F., 2010. "Research on warehouse design and performance evaluation: A comprehensive review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 539-549, June.
    4. Natanaree Sooksaksun & Voratas Kachitvichyanukul & Dah-Chuan Gong, 2012. "A class-based storage warehouse design using a particle swarm optimisation algorithm," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(2), pages 219-237.
    5. Grootveld, Henk & Hallerbach, Winfried, 1999. "Variance vs downside risk: Is there really that much difference?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 304-319, April.
    6. Ashayeri, J. & Gelders, L. F., 1985. "Warehouse design optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 285-294, September.
    7. John M. Mulvey & Robert J. Vanderbei & Stavros A. Zenios, 1995. "Robust Optimization of Large-Scale Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 264-281, April.
    8. Rouwenhorst, B. & Reuter, B. & Stockrahm, V. & van Houtum, G. J. & Mantel, R. J. & Zijm, W. H. M., 2000. "Warehouse design and control: Framework and literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 515-533, May.
    9. Berg, J. P. van den & Zijm, W. H. M., 1999. "Models for warehouse management: Classification and examples," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 519-528, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruiying Li & Xiaoyu Tian & Li Yu & Rui Kang, 2019. "A Systematic Disturbance Analysis Method for Resilience Evaluation: A Case Study in Material Handling Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Dong, Wenquan & Jin, Mingzhou, 2024. "Automated storage and retrieval system design with variant lane depths," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 630-646.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brogan, Anita J. & Stidham Jr., Shaler, 2008. "Non-separation in the mean-lower-partial-moment portfolio optimization problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(2), pages 701-710, January.
    2. Karma, Otto & Sander, Priit, 2006. "The impact of financial leverage on risk of equity measured by loss-oriented risk measures: An option pricing approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(3), pages 1340-1356, December.
    3. Gökgöz, Fazıl & Atmaca, Mete Emin, 2017. "Portfolio optimization under lower partial moments in emerging electricity markets: Evidence from Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 437-449.
    4. Ayub, Usman & Shah, Syed Zulfiqar Ali & Abbas, Qaisar, 2015. "Robust analysis for downside risk in portfolio management for a volatile stock market," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 86-96.
    5. Schuhmacher, Frank & Auer, Benjamin R., 2014. "Sufficient conditions under which SSD- and MR-efficient sets are identical," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 756-763.
    6. de Koster, M.B.M. & Le-Duc, T. & Roodbergen, K.J., 2006. "Design and Control of Warehouse Order Picking: a literature review," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2006-005-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    7. Vidal Vieira, José Geraldo & Ramos Toso, Milton & da Silva, João Eduardo Azevedo Ramos & Cabral Ribeiro, Priscilla Cristina, 2017. "An AHP-based framework for logistics operations in distribution centres," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 246-259.
    8. Rakesh Venkitasubramony & Gajendra K. Adil, 2021. "Modeling the effect of imperfect staggering in product inflow using queuing theory: revisiting block stacking layout," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 689-716, September.
    9. Rubio-Herrero, Javier & Baykal-Gürsoy, Melike, 2020. "Mean-variance analysis of the newsvendor problem with price-dependent, isoelastic demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 942-953.
    10. de Koster, Rene & Le-Duc, Tho & Roodbergen, Kees Jan, 2007. "Design and control of warehouse order picking: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(2), pages 481-501, October.
    11. Fulga, Cristinca, 2016. "Portfolio optimization under loss aversion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(1), pages 310-322.
    12. Rubio-Herrero, Javier & Baykal-Gürsoy, Melike, 2018. "On the unimodality of the price-setting newsvendor problem with additive demand under risk considerations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 962-974.
    13. Mansini, Renata & Ogryczak, Wlodzimierz & Speranza, M. Grazia, 2014. "Twenty years of linear programming based portfolio optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 518-535.
    14. Hildebrandt, Patrick & Knoke, Thomas, 2011. "Investment decisions under uncertainty--A methodological review on forest science studies," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, January.
    15. Lanza, Giacomo & Passacantando, Mauro & Scutellà, Maria Grazia, 2022. "Assigning and sequencing storage locations under a two level storage policy: Optimization model and matheuristic approaches," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    16. Dipankar Mondal & N. Selvaraju, 2022. "Convexity, two-fund separation and asset ranking in a mean-LPM portfolio selection framework," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(1), pages 225-248, March.
    17. Gupta, Pankaj & Mittal, Garima & Mehlawat, Mukesh Kumar, 2013. "Expected value multiobjective portfolio rebalancing model with fuzzy parameters," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 190-203.
    18. Wojtek Michalowski & Włodzimierz Ogryczak, 2001. "Extending the MAD portfolio optimization model to incorporate downside risk aversion," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(3), pages 185-200, April.
    19. Ogryczak, Wlodzimierz & Ruszczynski, Andrzej, 1999. "From stochastic dominance to mean-risk models: Semideviations as risk measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 33-50, July.
    20. Elie Matta & Jean McGuire, 2008. "Too Risky to Hold? The Effect of Downside Risk, Accumulated Equity Wealth, and Firm Performance on CEO Equity Reduction," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 567-580, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:170:y:2015:i:pc:p:815-824. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.