IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v164y2015icp421-432.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reduction of carbon emissions and project makespan by a Pareto-based estimation of distribution algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng, Huan-yu
  • Wang, Ling

Abstract

Due to the increasing concerns about global warming, low-carbon production has been a hot topic around the world. In this paper, carbon emissions reduction and project makespan minimization are considered simultaneously. To formulate the problem, a multi-objective multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling model with makespan and carbon emissions criteria is given. To solve the problem, a Pareto-based estimation of distribution algorithm (PBEDA) is proposed. Specifically, an activity-mode list is used to encode the individual of the population; a hybrid probability model is built to describe the probability distribution of the solution space; and two Pareto archives are adopted to store the explored non-dominated solutions and the solutions for updating the probability model, respectively. New individuals are generated in the promising search areas by sampling and updating the hybrid probability model. Besides, Taguchi method of design of experiments is adopted to study the effect of parameter setting. Finally, numerical results and the comparisons to other algorithms are provided to show the effectiveness of the PBEDA in terms of quantity and quality of the obtained solutions. The Pareto set derived by the PBEDA can be helpful for project manager to recognize the relationship between carbon emissions and makespan so as to properly trade-off the two criteria according to certain preference.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng, Huan-yu & Wang, Ling, 2015. "Reduction of carbon emissions and project makespan by a Pareto-based estimation of distribution algorithm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 421-432.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:164:y:2015:i:c:p:421-432
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527314003934
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hua, Guowei & Cheng, T.C.E. & Wang, Shouyang, 2011. "Managing carbon footprints in inventory management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 178-185, August.
    2. Hartmann, Sonke & Kolisch, Rainer, 2000. "Experimental evaluation of state-of-the-art heuristics for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 394-407, December.
    3. Edward W. Davis & James H. Patterson, 1975. "A Comparison of Heuristic and Optimum Solutions in Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(8), pages 944-955, April.
    4. Yu, Shiwei & Wei, Yi-Ming & Guo, Haixiang & Ding, Liping, 2014. "Carbon emission coefficient measurement of the coal-to-power energy chain in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 290-300.
    5. Wang, Sheng-yao & Wang, Ling & Liu, Min & Xu, Ye, 2013. "An effective estimation of distribution algorithm for solving the distributed permutation flow-shop scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 387-396.
    6. Kolisch, Rainer, 1996. "Serial and parallel resource-constrained project scheduling methods revisited: Theory and computation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 320-333, April.
    7. Anonymous, 2013. "Introduction to the Issue," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 243-243, December.
    8. Isabelle Huault & V. Perret & S. Charreire-Petit, 2007. "Management," Post-Print halshs-00337676, HAL.
    9. Brucker, Peter & Drexl, Andreas & Mohring, Rolf & Neumann, Klaus & Pesch, Erwin, 1999. "Resource-constrained project scheduling: Notation, classification, models, and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 3-41, January.
    10. Vo[ss], Stefan & Witt, Andreas, 2007. "Hybrid flow shop scheduling as a multi-mode multi-project scheduling problem with batching requirements: A real-world application," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(2), pages 445-458, February.
    11. Kolisch, Rainer & Sprecher, Arno, 1996. "PSPLIB - a project scheduling problem library," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 396, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    12. Chaabane, A. & Ramudhin, A. & Paquet, M., 2012. "Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 37-49.
    13. Absi, Nabil & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Kedad-Sidhoum, Safia & Penz, Bernard & Rapine, Christophe, 2013. "Lot sizing with carbon emission constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 55-61.
    14. Erica L. Plambeck & L. Beril Toktay, 2013. "Introduction to the Special Issue on the Environment," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 523-526, October.
    15. Sundarakani, Balan & de Souza, Robert & Goh, Mark & Wagner, Stephan M. & Manikandan, Sushmera, 2010. "Modeling carbon footprints across the supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 43-50, November.
    16. Chang, Pei-Chann & Hsieh, Jih-Chang & Lin, Shui-Geng, 2002. "The development of gradual-priority weighting approach for the multi-objective flowshop scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 171-183, October.
    17. Anonymous, 2013. "Introduction to the Issue," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 129-130, November.
    18. Anantaram Balakrishnan & Stuart Brown, 1996. "Process Planning for Aluminum Tubes: An Engineering-Operations Perspective," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 7-20, February.
    19. Hartmann, Sönke & Kolisch, R., 2000. "Experimental evaluation of state-of-the-art heuristics for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 11180, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    20. Quintanilla, Sacramento & Pérez, Ángeles & Lino, Pilar & Valls, Vicente, 2012. "Time and work generalised precedence relationships in project scheduling with pre-emption: An application to the management of Service Centres," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 59-72.
    21. Zhang, Bin & Wang, Zhaohua, 2014. "Inter-firm collaborations on carbon emission reduction within industrial chains in China: Practices, drivers and effects on firms' performances," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 115-131.
    22. Zhu, Zhi-Shuang & Liao, Hua & Cao, Huai-Shu & Wang, Lu & Wei, Yi-Ming & Yan, Jinyue, 2014. "The differences of carbon intensity reduction rate across 89 countries in recent three decades," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 808-815.
    23. Luo, Hao & Du, Bing & Huang, George Q. & Chen, Huaping & Li, Xiaolin, 2013. "Hybrid flow shop scheduling considering machine electricity consumption cost," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 423-439.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lin Li & Qiangwei Zhang & Tie Zhang & Yanbiao Zou & Xing Zhao, 2023. "Optimum Route and Transport Mode Selection of Multimodal Transport with Time Window under Uncertain Conditions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-25, July.
    2. Hajo Terbrack & Thorsten Claus & Frank Herrmann, 2021. "Energy-Oriented Production Planning in Industry: A Systematic Literature Review and Classification Scheme," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-32, December.
    3. Weiwei Cui & Lin Li & Zhiqiang Lu, 2019. "Energy‐efficient scheduling for sustainable manufacturing systems with renewable energy resources," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(2), pages 154-173, March.
    4. Yi Xie & Shitao Chen & Qianyun Ni & Hanqing Wu, 2019. "Integration of resource allocation and task assignment for optimizing the cost and maximum throughput of business processes," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 1351-1369, March.
    5. Shou-feng Ji & Rong-juan Luo, 2017. "A Hybrid Estimation of Distribution Algorithm for Multi-Objective Multi-Sourcing Intermodal Transportation Network Design Problem Considering Carbon Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-24, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kolisch, R. & Padman, R., 2001. "An integrated survey of deterministic project scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 249-272, June.
    2. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2010. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Peteghem, Vincent Van & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2010. "A genetic algorithm for the preemptive and non-preemptive multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(2), pages 409-418, March.
    4. Fleszar, Krzysztof & Hindi, Khalil S., 2004. "Solving the resource-constrained project scheduling problem by a variable neighbourhood search," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(2), pages 402-413, June.
    5. Browning, Tyson R. & Yassine, Ali A., 2010. "Resource-constrained multi-project scheduling: Priority rule performance revisited," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 212-228, August.
    6. Chen, Jiaqiong & Askin, Ronald G., 2009. "Project selection, scheduling and resource allocation with time dependent returns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 23-34, February.
    7. Dieter Debels & Mario Vanhoucke, 2007. "A Decomposition-Based Genetic Algorithm for the Resource-Constrained Project-Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 457-469, June.
    8. Meng, Xiaoge & Yao, Zhong & Nie, Jiajia & Zhao, Yingxue & Li, Zenglu, 2018. "Low-carbon product selection with carbon tax and competition: Effects of the power structure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 224-230.
    9. Debels, Dieter & De Reyck, Bert & Leus, Roel & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2006. "A hybrid scatter search/electromagnetism meta-heuristic for project scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(2), pages 638-653, March.
    10. Bouleimen, K. & Lecocq, H., 2003. "A new efficient simulated annealing algorithm for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem and its multiple mode version," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(2), pages 268-281, September.
    11. Anıl Can & Gündüz Ulusoy, 2014. "Multi-project scheduling with two-stage decomposition," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 217(1), pages 95-116, June.
    12. Van Peteghem, Vincent & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2014. "An experimental investigation of metaheuristics for the multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem on new dataset instances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 62-72.
    13. Buddhakulsomsiri, Jirachai & Kim, David S., 2006. "Properties of multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problems with resource vacations and activity splitting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(1), pages 279-295, November.
    14. Rahman Torba & Stéphane Dauzère-Pérès & Claude Yugma & Cédric Gallais & Juliette Pouzet, 2024. "Solving a real-life multi-skill resource-constrained multi-project scheduling problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(1), pages 69-114, July.
    15. Bernardo F. Almeida & Isabel Correia & Francisco Saldanha-da-Gama, 2018. "A biased random-key genetic algorithm for the project scheduling problem with flexible resources," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 26(2), pages 283-308, July.
    16. Guo, Weikang & Vanhoucke, Mario & Coelho, José, 2023. "A prediction model for ranking branch-and-bound procedures for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 579-595.
    17. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2008. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Working Paper Series 02/2008, Hamburg School of Business Administration (HSBA).
    18. Gehring, Marco & Volk, Rebekka & Schultmann, Frank, 2022. "On the integration of diverging material flows into resource‐constrained project scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1071-1087.
    19. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2022. "An updated survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 1-14.
    20. Hartmann, Sönke, 2011. "Project scheduling with resource capacities and requests varying with time," Working Paper Series 01/2011, Hamburg School of Business Administration (HSBA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:164:y:2015:i:c:p:421-432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.