IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v143y2013i2p316-326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A fractal echelon approach for inventory management in supply chain networks

Author

Listed:
  • Ryu, Kwangyeol
  • Moon, Ilkyeong
  • Oh, Seungjin
  • Jung, Mooyoung

Abstract

A major issue in supply chain inventory management is the coordination of inventory policies adopted by different members in a supply chain including suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, etc. This paper presents a fractal-based approach for inventory management in order to minimize inventory costs and smooth material flows between supply chain members while responsively meeting customer demand. Within this framework, each member in the supply chain is defined as a self-similar structure, referred to as a fractal. A fractal-based echelon does not indicate a functional level or composition of supply chain members but indicates a group of multi- or hetero-functional fractals. The basic fractal unit (BFU) consists of five functional modules including an observer, an analyzer, a resolver, an organizer, and a reporter. The application of the fractal concept into inventory management makes it easy to intuitively understand and manage supply chain inventories because similar functional modules can be iteratively applied to an inventory management system. More specifically, we apply the fractal concept to a vendor managed inventory (VMI) model, referred to as fractal-based VMI (fVMI), where a vendor assumes responsibility for maintaining inventory levels and determining order quantities for his buyers. In this paper, we develop mathematical models for the analyzer and resolver to effectively manage supply chain inventories. For validating the proposed approach, a comprehensive simulation model, representing two VMI initiatives including traditional VMI and fVMI, is constructed and used for comparative analyses of case studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryu, Kwangyeol & Moon, Ilkyeong & Oh, Seungjin & Jung, Mooyoung, 2013. "A fractal echelon approach for inventory management in supply chain networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 316-326.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:143:y:2013:i:2:p:316-326
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527312000035
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herer, Yale T. & Tzur, Michal & Yucesan, Enver, 2002. "Transshipments: An emerging inventory recourse to achieve supply chain leagility," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 201-212, December.
    2. Disney, S. M. & Towill, D. R., 2003. "The effect of vendor managed inventory (VMI) dynamics on the Bullwhip Effect in supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 199-215, August.
    3. Sari, Kazim, 2008. "On the benefits of CPFR and VMI: A comparative simulation study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 575-586, June.
    4. Axsater, Sven & Juntti, Lars, 1996. "Comparison of echelon stock and installation stock policies for two-level inventory systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1-3), pages 303-310, August.
    5. De Toni, Alberto Felice & Zamolo, Elena, 2005. "From a traditional replenishment system to vendor-managed inventory: A case study from the household electrical appliances sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 63-79, April.
    6. Hau L. Lee & V. Padmanabhan & Seungjin Whang, 1997. "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 546-558, April.
    7. Petrovic, Dobrila & Roy, Rajat & Petrovic, Radivoj, 1999. "Supply chain modelling using fuzzy sets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 443-453, March.
    8. Sila Çetinkaya & Chung-Yee Lee, 2000. "Stock Replenishment and Shipment Scheduling for Vendor-Managed Inventory Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 217-232, February.
    9. Giannoccaro, Ilaria & Pontrandolfo, Pierpaolo & Scozzi, Barbara, 2003. "A fuzzy echelon approach for inventory management in supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(1), pages 185-196, August.
    10. Blyth C. Archibald & Edward A. Silver, 1978. "(s, S) Policies Under Continuous Review and Discrete Compound Poisson Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(9), pages 899-909, May.
    11. Kelle, Peter & Milne, Alistair, 1999. "The effect of (s, S) ordering policy on the supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 113-122, March.
    12. Dong, Yan & Xu, Kefeng, 2002. "A supply chain model of vendor managed inventory," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 75-95, April.
    13. Birendra K. Mishra & Srinivasan Raghunathan, 2004. "Retailer- vs. Vendor-Managed Inventory and Brand Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(4), pages 445-457, April.
    14. Nachiappan, S.P. & Jawahar, N., 2007. "A genetic algorithm for optimal operating parameters of VMI system in a two-echelon supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(3), pages 1433-1452, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rad, Reza Hosseini & Razmi, Jafar & Sangari, Mohamad Sadegh & Ebrahimi, Zahra Fallah, 2014. "Optimizing an integrated vendor-managed inventory system for a single-vendor two-buyer supply chain with determining weighting factor for vendor׳s ordering cost," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 295-308.
    2. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Shokr, Iman & Konstantaras, Ioannis & VafaeiNejad, Mahyar, 2020. "Stock replenishment policies for a vendor-managed inventory in a retailing system," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    3. Sylvia Mardiana, 2023. "Gasoline Policy Simulation to Increase Responsiveness Using System Dynamics: A Case Study of Indonesia’s Gasoline Downstream Supply Chain," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(6), pages 109-118, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Southard, Peter B. & Swenseth, Scott R., 2008. "Evaluating vendor-managed inventory (VMI) in non-traditional environments using simulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 275-287, December.
    2. Sari, Kazim, 2008. "On the benefits of CPFR and VMI: A comparative simulation study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 575-586, June.
    3. Rad, Reza Hosseini & Razmi, Jafar & Sangari, Mohamad Sadegh & Ebrahimi, Zahra Fallah, 2014. "Optimizing an integrated vendor-managed inventory system for a single-vendor two-buyer supply chain with determining weighting factor for vendor׳s ordering cost," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 295-308.
    4. Darwish, M.A. & Odah, O.M., 2010. "Vendor managed inventory model for single-vendor multi-retailer supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 473-484, August.
    5. Sainathan, Arvind & Groenevelt, Harry, 2019. "Vendor managed inventory contracts – coordinating the supply chain while looking from the vendor’s perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 249-260.
    6. Wong, W.K. & Qi, J. & Leung, S.Y.S., 2009. "Coordinating supply chains with sales rebate contracts and vendor-managed inventory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 151-161, July.
    7. Rajesh K. Singh, 2013. "Analyzing the Factors for VMI Implementation: A Framework," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 14(1), pages 169-186, February.
    8. Sule Birim & Cigdem Sofyalioglu, 2017. "Evaluating vendor managed inventory systems: how incentives can benefit supply chain partners," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 163-179, January.
    9. Lu, Xin & Shang, Jennifer & Wu, Shin-yi & Hegde, Gajanan G. & Vargas, Luis & Zhao, Daozhi, 2015. "Impacts of supplier hubris on inventory decisions and green manufacturing endeavors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 121-132.
    10. Miragliotta, Giovanni, 2006. "Layers and mechanisms: A new taxonomy for the Bullwhip Effect," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 365-381, December.
    11. Deniz Preil & Michael Krapp, 2022. "Artificial intelligence-based inventory management: a Monte Carlo tree search approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 415-439, January.
    12. Kristianto, Yohanes & Helo, Petri & Jiao, Jianxin (Roger) & Sandhu, Maqsood, 2012. "Adaptive fuzzy vendor managed inventory control for mitigating the Bullwhip effect in supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 346-355.
    13. Diabat, Ali, 2014. "Hybrid algorithm for a vendor managed inventory system in a two-echelon supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 114-121.
    14. Weißhuhn, Sandria & Hoberg, Kai, 2021. "Designing smart replenishment systems: Internet-of-Things technology for vendor-managed inventory at end consumers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 949-964.
    15. Xu, Kefeng & Leung, Mark T., 2009. "Stocking policy in a two-party vendor managed channel with space restrictions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 271-285, February.
    16. de Kok, Ton & Grob, Christopher & Laumanns, Marco & Minner, Stefan & Rambau, Jörg & Schade, Konrad, 2018. "A typology and literature review on stochastic multi-echelon inventory models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 955-983.
    17. Enrique Holgado de Frutos & Juan R Trapero & Francisco Ramos, 2020. "A literature review on operational decisions applied to collaborative supply chains," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-28, March.
    18. Lyu, JrJung & Ding, Jyh-Hong & Chen, Ping-Shun, 2010. "Coordinating replenishment mechanisms in supply chain: From the collaborative supplier and store-level retailer perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 221-234, January.
    19. María Arquer & Borja Ponte & Raúl Pino, 2022. "Examining the balance between efficiency and resilience in closed-loop supply chains," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(4), pages 1307-1336, December.
    20. Wang, Xun & Disney, Stephen M., 2016. "The bullwhip effect: Progress, trends and directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 691-701.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:143:y:2013:i:2:p:316-326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.