IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/oprepe/v11y2023ics2214716023000283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deep reinforcement learning based medical supplies dispatching model for major infectious diseases: Case study of COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Zeng, Jia-Ying
  • Lu, Ping
  • Wei, Ying
  • Chen, Xin
  • Lin, Kai-Biao

Abstract

Stockpiling and scheduling plans for medical supplies represent essential preventive and control measures in major public health events. In the face of major infectious diseases, such as the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), the outbreak trend and variability of disease strains are often unpredictable. Hence, it is necessary to optimally adjust the prevention and control dispatching strategy according to the circumstances and outbreak locations to maintain economic development while ensuring the human health survival, however, many models in this scenario seldom consider the dynamic material prediction and the measurement of multiple costs at the same time. Taking the COVID-19 scenario as a case study, we establish a deep reinforcement learning (DRL)-based medical supplies dispatching (MSD) model for major infectious diseases, considering the volatility of the COVID-19 situation and the discrepancy between medical material demand and supply due to the high infectiousness of the Omicron series strains. The present model has three main components: 1) First, for the dynamic medical material prediction problem in complex infectious disease scenarios, taking the lifted COVID-19 lockdown scenario as an example, the modified susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered (SEIR) model was utilized to analyze the spread of the COVID-19, understand its characteristics, and map out the related medical supplies demand; 2) Second, to break away from the previous premise of only considering supply-demand, this study adds scheduling rules and cost function that weighs health and economic costs. An epidemic dispatching optimization model (Epi_DispatchOptim) was established using the OpenAI Gym toolkit to form an environment structure with virus transmission space, and emergency MSD while considering both human health and economic costs. This architecture interprets the balance between the supply-demand of medical supplies and reflects the importance of MSD in the balanced development of health and economy under the spread of infectious diseases; 3) Finally, the MSD strategy under the balance of health and economic cost is explored in Epi_DispatchOptim using reinforcement learning (RL) and the evolutionary algorithm (EA). Experiments conducted on two datasets indicate that the RL and EA reduce economic as well as health costs compared to the original environmental strategies. The above study illustrates how to use epidemiological models to predict the demand for healthcare supplies as the premise of scheduling models, and use Epi_DispatchOptim to explore the dynamic MSD decisions under mortality and economic equilibrium. In Shanghai, China, the economic cost of the exploration strategy is reduced by 27.36–27.07B compared to static scheduling, and deaths are reduced by 126–150 in 150 day compared to the no-intervention scenario. By integrating knowledge of epidemiology, optimal decision making, and economics, Epi_DispatchOptim further constructs epidemiological models, cost functions, state-action spaces, and other modules to assist public health decision makers in adopting appropriate MSD strategies for major public health event.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeng, Jia-Ying & Lu, Ping & Wei, Ying & Chen, Xin & Lin, Kai-Biao, 2023. "Deep reinforcement learning based medical supplies dispatching model for major infectious diseases: Case study of COVID-19," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 11(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:11:y:2023:i:c:s2214716023000283
    DOI: 10.1016/j.orp.2023.100293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716023000283
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.orp.2023.100293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Douglas, Paul H, 1976. "The Cobb-Douglas Production Function Once Again: Its History, Its Testing, and Some New Empirical Values," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 84(5), pages 903-915, October.
    2. Jürgen Hackl & Thibaut Dubernet, 2019. "Epidemic Spreading in Urban Areas Using Agent-Based Transportation Models," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Volodymyr Mnih & Koray Kavukcuoglu & David Silver & Andrei A. Rusu & Joel Veness & Marc G. Bellemare & Alex Graves & Martin Riedmiller & Andreas K. Fidjeland & Georg Ostrovski & Stig Petersen & Charle, 2015. "Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning," Nature, Nature, vol. 518(7540), pages 529-533, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Costa, Marcelo Azevedo & Lopes, Ana Lúcia Miranda & de Pinho Matos, Giordano Bruno Braz, 2015. "Statistical evaluation of Data Envelopment Analysis versus COLS Cobb–Douglas benchmarking models for the 2011 Brazilian tariff revision," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 47-60.
    2. Tulika Saha & Sriparna Saha & Pushpak Bhattacharyya, 2020. "Towards sentiment aided dialogue policy learning for multi-intent conversations using hierarchical reinforcement learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-28, July.
    3. Xu, Xianghui & Chen, Yingshan & Zhou, Yan & Liu, Wuyuan & Zhang, Xinrui & Li, Mo, 2023. "Sustainable management of agricultural water rights trading under uncertainty: An optimization-evaluation framework," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    4. Jael, Paul, 2019. "Does Marginal Productivity Mean Anything in Real Economic Life ?," MPRA Paper 97968, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jan 2020.
    5. Mahmoud Mahfouz & Angelos Filos & Cyrine Chtourou & Joshua Lockhart & Samuel Assefa & Manuela Veloso & Danilo Mandic & Tucker Balch, 2019. "On the Importance of Opponent Modeling in Auction Markets," Papers 1911.12816, arXiv.org.
    6. Imen Azzouz & Wiem Fekih Hassen, 2023. "Optimization of Electric Vehicles Charging Scheduling Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Decentralized Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Jacob W. Crandall & Mayada Oudah & Tennom & Fatimah Ishowo-Oloko & Sherief Abdallah & Jean-François Bonnefon & Manuel Cebrian & Azim Shariff & Michael A. Goodrich & Iyad Rahwan, 2018. "Cooperating with machines," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
      • Abdallah, Sherief & Bonnefon, Jean-François & Cebrian, Manuel & Crandall, Jacob W. & Ishowo-Oloko, Fatimah & Oudah, Mayada & Rahwan, Iyad & Shariff, Azim & Tennom,, 2017. "Cooperating with Machines," TSE Working Papers 17-806, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
      • Abdallah, Sherief & Bonnefon, Jean-François & Cebrian, Manuel & Crandall, Jacob W. & Ishowo-Oloko, Fatimah & Oudah, Mayada & Rahwan, Iyad & Shariff, Azim & Tennom,, 2017. "Cooperating with Machines," IAST Working Papers 17-68, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
      • Jacob Crandall & Mayada Oudah & Fatimah Ishowo-Oloko Tennom & Fatimah Ishowo-Oloko & Sherief Abdallah & Jean-François Bonnefon & Manuel Cebrian & Azim Shariff & Michael Goodrich & Iyad Rahwan, 2018. "Cooperating with machines," Post-Print hal-01897802, HAL.
    8. Sun, Alexander Y., 2020. "Optimal carbon storage reservoir management through deep reinforcement learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    9. Yassine Chemingui & Adel Gastli & Omar Ellabban, 2020. "Reinforcement Learning-Based School Energy Management System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Woo Jae Byun & Bumkyu Choi & Seongmin Kim & Joohyun Jo, 2023. "Practical Application of Deep Reinforcement Learning to Optimal Trade Execution," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Lu, Yu & Xiang, Yue & Huang, Yuan & Yu, Bin & Weng, Liguo & Liu, Junyong, 2023. "Deep reinforcement learning based optimal scheduling of active distribution system considering distributed generation, energy storage and flexible load," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    12. Yuhong Wang & Lei Chen & Hong Zhou & Xu Zhou & Zongsheng Zheng & Qi Zeng & Li Jiang & Liang Lu, 2021. "Flexible Transmission Network Expansion Planning Based on DQN Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.
    13. Huang, Ruchen & He, Hongwen & Gao, Miaojue, 2023. "Training-efficient and cost-optimal energy management for fuel cell hybrid electric bus based on a novel distributed deep reinforcement learning framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 346(C).
    14. Fanglin LI & Michael APPIAH & Regina Naa Amua DODOO, 2020. "The Effects Of Technology And Labor On Growth In Emerging Countries," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(2), pages 39-47, June.
    15. Michelle M. LaMar, 2018. "Markov Decision Process Measurement Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(1), pages 67-88, March.
    16. Zichen Lu & Ying Yan, 2024. "Temperature Control of Fuel Cell Based on PEI-DDPG," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-19, April.
    17. Yang, Ting & Zhao, Liyuan & Li, Wei & Zomaya, Albert Y., 2021. "Dynamic energy dispatch strategy for integrated energy system based on improved deep reinforcement learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    18. Moritz Kersting & Andreas Bossert & Leif Sörensen & Benjamin Wacker & Jan Chr. Schlüter, 2021. "Predicting effectiveness of countermeasures during the COVID-19 outbreak in South Africa using agent-based simulation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Wang, Xuan & Shu, Gequn & Tian, Hua & Wang, Rui & Cai, Jinwen, 2020. "Operation performance comparison of CCHP systems with cascade waste heat recovery systems by simulation and operation optimisation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    20. Wang, Yi & Qiu, Dawei & Sun, Mingyang & Strbac, Goran & Gao, Zhiwei, 2023. "Secure energy management of multi-energy microgrid: A physical-informed safe reinforcement learning approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:11:y:2023:i:c:s2214716023000283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/operations-research-perspectives .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.