IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matsoc/v73y2015icp63-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Symmetric measures of segregation, segregation curves, and Blackwell’s criterion

Author

Listed:
  • Hutchens, Robert

Abstract

This paper first proposes a new way to use segregation curves to examine whether one distribution of people across groups (e.g., occupations or neighborhoods) is more segregated than another. It then uses Blackwell’s criterion to extend the argument to more than two types of people. The basic idea is that by introducing additional assumptions about the nature of segregation, one obtains a more complete ranking of distributions. The paper demonstrates that the assumption of “symmetry in types”–an assumption that appears frequently in the literature on segregation measurement–has implications for both segregation curves and Blackwell’s criterion.

Suggested Citation

  • Hutchens, Robert, 2015. "Symmetric measures of segregation, segregation curves, and Blackwell’s criterion," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 63-68.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:73:y:2015:i:c:p:63-68
    DOI: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2014.11.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165489614000948
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2014.11.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Casilda Vega & Oscar Volij, 2014. "Segregation, informativeness and Lorenz dominance," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 43(3), pages 547-564, October.
    2. Frankel, David M. & Volij, Oscar, 2011. "Measuring school segregation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 1-38, January.
    3. Hutchens, Robert M., 1991. "Segregation curves, Lorenz curves, and inequality in the distribution of people across occupations," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 31-51, February.
    4. Hutchens, Robert, 2001. "Numerical measures of segregation: desirable properties and their implications," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 13-29, July.
    5. Robert Hutchens, 2004. "One Measure of Segregation," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 45(2), pages 555-578, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. I. Josa & A. Aguado, 2020. "Measuring Unidimensional Inequality: Practical Framework for the Choice of an Appropriate Measure," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 541-570, June.
    2. Francesco Andreoli & Claudio Zoli, 2023. "Robust dissimilarity comparisons with categorical outcomes," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 60(3), pages 397-437, April.
    3. Carmen Puerta & Ana Urrutia, 2016. "A characterization of the Gini segregation index," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 47(3), pages 519-529, October.
    4. Francesco Andreoli & Claudio Zoli, 2019. "Robust dissimilarity comparisons with categorical outcomes," Working Papers 502, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oscar Volij, 2018. "Segregation: theoretical approaches," Chapters, in: Conchita D’Ambrosio (ed.), Handbook of Research on Economic and Social Well-Being, chapter 21, pages 480-503, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Tugce, Cuhadaroglu, 2013. "My Group Beats Your Group: Evaluating Non-Income Inequalities," SIRE Discussion Papers 2013-49, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    3. SILBER Jacques, 2012. "Measuring Segregation: Basic Concepts and Extensions to Other Domains," LISER Working Paper Series 2012-20, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    4. Tugce Cuhadaroglu, 2013. "My Group Beats Your Group: Evaluating Non-Income Inequalities," Discussion Paper Series, School of Economics and Finance 201308, School of Economics and Finance, University of St Andrews.
    5. Alonso-Villar, Olga & del Río, Coral, 2010. "Local versus overall segregation measures," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 30-38, July.
    6. Casilda Lasso de la Vega & Oscar Volij, 2020. "The Measurement Of Income Segregation," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 61(4), pages 1479-1500, November.
    7. Stephen P. Jenkins & John Micklewright & Sylke V. Schnepf, 2006. "Social segregation in secondary schools: How does England compare with other countries?," Working Papers 27, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    8. Francesco Andreoli & Claudio Zoli, 2015. "Measuring the interaction dimension of segregation: the Gini-Exposure index," Working Papers 30/2015, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    9. Pascaline Vincent & Frédéric Chantreuil & Benoït Tarroux, 2012. "Appraising the breakdown of unequal individuals in large French cities," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes & University of Caen) 201220, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes, University of Caen and CNRS.
    10. Daniel Guinea-Martin & Ricardo Mora, 2022. "Computing decomposable multigroup indices of segregation," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 22(3), pages 521-556, September.
    11. Francesco Andreoli & Claudio Zoli, 2019. "Robust dissimilarity comparisons with categorical outcomes," Working Papers 502, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    12. Olga Alonso Villar & Coral del Río, 2010. "Segregation of female and male workers in Spain: occupations and industries," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 194(3), pages 91-121, June.
    13. Stephan Humpert, 2012. "Age and Gender Differences in Job Opportunities," Working Paper Series in Economics 235, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    14. Ray Chaudhury, Anjan & Sinha, Madhabendra, 2019. "Multi-group segregation for nominal and ordinal categorical data: An application to socio-religious groups in India," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 1095-1108.
    15. Diego C. Botassio & Rodolfo Hoffmann, 2020. "Measuring gender segregation," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 8(1), pages 25-47, April.
    16. Casilda Vega & Oscar Volij, 2014. "Segregation, informativeness and Lorenz dominance," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 43(3), pages 547-564, October.
    17. Francesco Andreoli & Claudio Zoli, 2023. "Robust dissimilarity comparisons with categorical outcomes," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 60(3), pages 397-437, April.
    18. Carlos Gradín, 2013. "Conditional occupational segregation of minorities in the US," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 11(4), pages 473-493, December.
    19. Coral del Río & Olga Alonso-Villar, 2010. "Occupational segregation measures: A role for status," Working Papers 167, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    20. Francesco Andreoli & Claudio Zoli, 2012. "On the Measurement of Dissimilarity and Related Orders," Working Papers 274, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:73:y:2015:i:c:p:63-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505565 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.