IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matsoc/v42y2001i1p89-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Continuous linear utility for preferences on convex sets in normed real vector spaces

Author

Listed:
  • Bultel, Dirk

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Bultel, Dirk, 2001. "Continuous linear utility for preferences on convex sets in normed real vector spaces," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 89-98, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:42:y:2001:i:1:p:89-98
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165-4896(00)00077-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Einy, Ezra, 1989. "On preference relations which satisfy weak independence property," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 291-300, June.
    2. EINY, Ezra, 1989. "On preference relations which satisfy weak independence property," LIDAM Reprints CORE 873, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    3. Nielsen, Lars Tyge, 1984. "Unbounded expected utility and continuity," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 201-216, December.
    4. Grandmont, Jean-Michel, 1972. "Continuity properties of a von Neumann-Morgenstern utility," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 45-57, February.
    5. Lucien Foldes, 1972. "Expected Utility and Continuity," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 39(4), pages 407-421.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bosi, Gianni & Zuanon, Magali E., 2003. "Continuous representability of homothetic preorders by means of sublinear order-preserving functions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 333-341, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erio Castagnoli & Marco LiCalzi, 2005. "Expected utility without utility," Game Theory and Information 0508004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Enrico Diecidue & Jeroen Van De Ven, 2008. "Aspiration Level, Probability Of Success And Failure, And Expected Utility," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 49(2), pages 683-700, May.
    3. Dubra, Juan & Maccheroni, Fabio & Ok, Efe A., 2004. "Expected utility theory without the completeness axiom," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 118-133, March.
    4. Ichiishi, Tatsuro, 1985. "Management versus ownership, II," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 115-138, March.
    5. Assa, Hirbod & Zimper, Alexander, 2018. "Preferences over all random variables: Incompatibility of convexity and continuity," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 71-83.
    6. Pivato, Marcus & Vergopoulos, Vassili, 2017. "Subjective expected utility representations for Savage preferences on topological spaces," MPRA Paper 77359, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Weiss, Michael D., 1985. "Risk Concepts Revisited: A Mathematical Approach," Regional Research Projects > 1985: S-180 Annual Meeting, March 24-27, 1985, Charleston, South Carolina 271791, Regional Research Projects > S-180: An Economic Analysis of Risk Management Strategies for Agricultural Production Firms.
    8. Hara, Kazuhiro, 2016. "Characterization of stationary preferences in a continuous time framework," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 34-43.
    9. Craig S. Webb, 2024. "Dynamic preference foundations of expected exponentially-discounted utility," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 77(4), pages 921-940, June.
    10. Calvet, Laurent-Emmanuel & Grandmont, Jean-Michel & Lemaire, Isabelle, 2018. "Aggregation of heterogenous beliefs, asset pricing, and risk sharing in complete financial markets," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 117-146.
    11. Thai Ha-Huy & Cuong Le Van & Frank Page & Myrna Wooders, 2017. "No-arbitrage and Equilibrium in Finite Dimension: A General Result," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01529663, HAL.
    12. Dillenberger, David & Vijay Krishna, R., 2014. "Expected utility without bounds—A simple proof," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 143-147.
    13. Allouch, Nizar & Le Van, Cuong & Page, Frank H., Jr., 2002. "Arbitrage, Equilibrium, and Nonsatiation," Economic Research Papers 269411, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    14. Fabio Maccheroni, 2004. "Yaari's dual theory without the completeness axiom," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 23(3), pages 701-714, March.
    15. Allouch, Nizar & Le Van, Cuong & Page, Frank Jr., 2002. "The geometry of arbitrage and the existence of competitive equilibrium," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 373-391, December.
    16. Alain Chateauneuf & Michèle Cohen & Jean-Marc Tallon, 2008. "Decision under risk : The classical Expected Utility model," Post-Print halshs-00348814, HAL.
    17. Allouch, Nizar & Le Van, Cuong & Page, Frank Jr., 2006. "Arbitrage and equilibrium in unbounded exchange economies with satiation," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 661-674, September.
    18. Marc Fleurbaey & Philippe Monginy, 2011. "The Relevance of Utilitarianism," Working Papers 1369, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Econometric Research Program..
    19. Ellis, Andrew, 2018. "Foundations for optimal inattention," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 56-94.
    20. Schmidt, Ulrich, 2003. "The axiomatic basis of risk-value models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 216-220, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:42:y:2001:i:1:p:89-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505565 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.