IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matsoc/v29y1995i3p255-262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A note on the representation of preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Toranzo, Margarita Estevez
  • Garcia-Cutrin, Javier
  • Lopez Lopez, Miguel A.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Toranzo, Margarita Estevez & Garcia-Cutrin, Javier & Lopez Lopez, Miguel A., 1995. "A note on the representation of preferences," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 255-262, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:29:y:1995:i:3:p:255-262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0165-4896(94)00762-W
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chateauneuf, Alain, 1987. "Continuous representation of a preference relation on a connected topological space," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 139-146, April.
    2. Bridges, Douglas S., 1983. "A numerical representation of preferences with intransitive indifference," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 25-42, January.
    3. Monteiro, Paulo Klinger, 1987. "Some results on the existence of utility functions on path connected spaces," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 147-156, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Estévez Toranzo, Margarita & Hervés Beloso, Carlos & López López, Miguel A., 1993. "Una nota sobre la representación numérica de relaciones de preferencia," DES - Documentos de Trabajo. Estadística y Econometría. DS 2941, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    2. Begoña Subiza Martínez & Carmen Herrero Blanco, 1991. "A characterization of acyclic preferences on countable sets," Working Papers. Serie AD 1991-01, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    3. Rajeev Kohli & Khaled Boughanmi & Vikram Kohli, 2019. "Randomized Algorithms for Lexicographic Inference," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 357-375, March.
    4. Nuh Aygün Dalkıran & Furkan Yıldız, 2021. "Another Characterization of Expected Scott-Suppes Utility Representation," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 35(2), pages 177-193.
    5. Begoña Subiza Martínez, 1993. "Numerical Representation Of Acyclic Preferences," Working Papers. Serie AD 1993-09, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    6. Shi, Bowen & Wang, Gaowang & Zhang, Zhixiang, 2020. "On the Utility Function Representability of Lexicographic Preferences," MPRA Paper 102561, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Charalambos Aliprantis & Kim Border & Owen Burkinshaw, 1996. "Market economies with many commodities," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 19(1), pages 113-185, March.
    8. Peris J. E. & Subiza, B., 1996. "Demand correspondence for pseudotransitive preferences," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 61-61, February.
    9. Estévez Toranzo, Margarita & García Cutrín, Javier & Hervés Beloso,Carlos & López López, Miguel A., 1993. "A note on representation of references," UC3M Working papers. Economics 2905, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    10. Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Klaus Ritzberger, 2015. "On the characterization of preference continuity by chains of sets," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 3(2), pages 115-128, October.
    11. Gilboa, Itzhak & Lapson, Robert, 1995. "Aggregation of Semiorders: Intransitive Indifference Makes a Difference," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 5(1), pages 109-126, January.
    12. Toranzo, Margarita Estevez & Beloso, Carlos Herves, 1995. "On the existence of continuous preference orderings without utility representations," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 305-309.
    13. Romano Isler, 1997. "Semicontinuous utility functions in topological spaces," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 20(1), pages 111-116, June.
    14. M. Ali Khan & Metin Uyanık, 2021. "Topological connectedness and behavioral assumptions on preferences: a two-way relationship," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 71(2), pages 411-460, March.
    15. Elvio Accinelli, 1999. "Existence of GE: Are the Cases of Non Existence a Cause of Serious Worry?," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 0999, Department of Economics - dECON.
    16. Bosi, Gianni & Zuanon, Magalì, 2014. "Upper semicontinuous representations of interval orders," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 60-63.
    17. Bosi, Gianni & Candeal, Juan Carlos & Indurain, Esteban, 2000. "Continuous representability of homothetic preferences by means of homogeneous utility functions," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 291-298, April.
    18. Beardon, Alan F. & Candeal, Juan C. & Herden, Gerhard & Indurain, Esteban & Mehta, Ghanshyam B., 2002. "The non-existence of a utility function and the structure of non-representable preference relations," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 17-38, February.
    19. Lumley, Thomas & Gillen, Daniel L., 2016. "Characterising transitive two-sample tests," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 118-123.
    20. Campion, Maria J. & Candeal, Juan C. & Indurain, Esteban, 2006. "The existence of utility functions for weakly continuous preferences on a Banach space," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 227-237, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:29:y:1995:i:3:p:255-262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505565 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.