IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matsoc/v108y2020icp50-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time is money: An economic analysis of the optimal pacing problem

Author

Listed:
  • Watt, Richard
  • Gunby, Philip

Abstract

Athletes in many sports can potentially earn significant amounts of prize money from taking less time to complete a given distance than their competitors. Time is literally money in these cases. The objective of an athlete is to choose an optimal race strategy that minimizes race time without becoming prematurely exhausted. If the first part of a race is completed too quickly, the fatigue generated makes the second part of the race slow and painful. If completed too slowly, the second part will be fast but it cannot make up for the time lost earlier on. Either way, the total time taken to complete the entire distance will not be as fast as it could otherwise have been. This optimal decision problem has long been debated by athletes, coaches, and more recently by physicists and applied mathematicians. We show that this optimal choice problem can be solved with solutions that are both simple enough for them to be of practical use but flexible enough for them to be personalized for an athlete. We use the 800 m running race to demonstrate how our technique works since it is a well known ideal example of an event that combines both the elements of speed and endurance.

Suggested Citation

  • Watt, Richard & Gunby, Philip, 2020. "Time is money: An economic analysis of the optimal pacing problem," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 50-61.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:108:y:2020:i:c:p:50-61
    DOI: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2020.08.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165489620300858
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2020.08.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam Hoffer & Brad R. Humphreys & Donald J. Lacombe & Jane E. Ruseski, 2015. "Trends in NCAA Athletic Spending," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 16(6), pages 576-596, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jennifer A. Delaney & Tyler D. Kearney, 2022. "TV Networks for College Sports: Implications for Institutional Subsidies," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 63(7), pages 1158-1203, November.
    2. Candon Johnson & Bryan C. McCannon, 2022. "Athletics and Admissions: The Impact of the Penn State Football Scandal on Student Quality," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 23(2), pages 200-221, February.
    3. R. Todd Jewell, 2020. "NCAA Expenditure and Efficiency: Analyzing Generated and Allocated Revenue in the Football Bowl Subdivision," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 21(4), pages 363-390, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:108:y:2020:i:c:p:50-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505565 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.