IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/mateco/v73y2017icp54-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Core equivalence with differentiated commodities

Author

Listed:
  • Greinecker, Michael
  • Podczeck, Konrad

Abstract

This paper presents improved core equivalence results for atomless economies with differentiated commodities in the framework of Ostroy and Zame (1994). Commodity bundles are elements of the space M(K) of signed Borel measures on a compact space K of commodity characteristics. Ostroy and Zame provide two sufficient conditions for core equivalence: It is sufficient that markets are “physically thick”, so that there are many suppliers of every commodity, or that markets are “economically thick”, so that consumers are sufficiently willing to substitute commodities with a similar composition for each other. The sufficient conditions in Ostroy and Zame (1994) all imply that there are “many more agents than commodities”, an idea of Aumann that was formalized and discussed in Tourky and Yannelis (2001) and Greinecker and Podczeck (2016). We generalize the framework in Ostroy and Zame (1994) and weaken their sufficient conditions to not imply the presence of “many more agents than commodities”. In particular, we drop the requirement that K is metrizable from the basic model, the requirement of an uniform bound on endowments from the condition of “physically thick markets”, and the requirement that preferences are weak∗-continuous from the condition of “economically thick markets”. Core equivalence still holds, showing that “many more agents than commodities” are not needed for core equivalence in models of commodity differentiation.

Suggested Citation

  • Greinecker, Michael & Podczeck, Konrad, 2017. "Core equivalence with differentiated commodities," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 54-67.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:mateco:v:73:y:2017:i:c:p:54-67
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jmateco.2017.08.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304406817301040
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jmateco.2017.08.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jones, Larry E, 1984. "A Competitive Model of Commodity Differentiation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(2), pages 507-530, March.
    2. Mas-Colell, Andreu, 1975. "A model of equilibrium with differentiated commodities," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 263-295.
    3. Konrad Podczeck, 2003. "Core and Walrasian equilibria when agents' characteristics are extremely dispersed," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 22(4), pages 699-725, November.
    4. Bewley, Truman F, 1973. "The Equality of the Core and the Set of Equilibria in Economies with Infinitely Many Commodities and a Continuum of Agents," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 14(2), pages 383-394, June.
    5. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2344 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Rustichini, Aldo & Yannelis, Nicholas C., 1991. "Edgeworth's conjecture in economies with a continuum of agents and commodities," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 307-326.
    7. Ezra Einy & Diego Moreno & Benyamin Shitovitz, 2005. "Competitive and core allocations in large economies with differential information," Studies in Economic Theory, in: Dionysius Glycopantis & Nicholas C. Yannelis (ed.), Differential Information Economies, pages 173-183, Springer.
    8. Ostroy, Joseph M & Zame, William R, 1994. "Nonatomic Economies and the Boundaries of Perfect Competition," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 593-633, May.
    9. Michael Greinecker & Konrad Podczeck, 2016. "Edgeworth’s conjecture and the number of agents and commodities," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 62(1), pages 93-130, June.
    10. Tourky, Rabee & Yannelis, Nicholas C., 2001. "Markets with Many More Agents than Commodities: Aumann's "Hidden" Assumption," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 189-221, November.
    11. Podczeck, K., 2004. "On Core-Walras equivalence in Banach spaces when feasibility is defined by the Pettis integral," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(3-4), pages 429-463, June.
    12. Laura Angeloni & V. Martins-da-Rocha, 2009. "Large economies with differential information and without free disposal," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 38(2), pages 263-286, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei He & Yeneng Sun, 2018. "Conditional expectation of correspondences and economic applications," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 66(2), pages 265-299, August.
    2. Bernard Cornet & V. Filipe Martins-Da-Rocha, 2021. "Fatou's Lemma for Unbounded Gelfand Integrable Mappings," Post-Print hal-03506933, HAL.
    3. Motoki Otsuka, 2024. "The existence of Walrasian equilibrium: infinitely many commodities, measure space of agents, and discontinuous preferences," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 12(2), pages 119-140, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suzuki, Takashi, 2013. "Core and competitive equilibria of a coalitional exchange economy with infinite time horizon," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 234-244.
    2. Podczeck, K., 2005. "On core-Walras equivalence in Banach lattices," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 764-792, September.
    3. Podczeck, K., 2004. "On Core-Walras equivalence in Banach spaces when feasibility is defined by the Pettis integral," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(3-4), pages 429-463, June.
    4. Konrad Podczeck, 2003. "On Core-Walras Equivalence in Banach Spaces when Feasibility is defined by the Pettis Integral," Vienna Economics Papers 0403, University of Vienna, Department of Economics.
    5. Bhowmik, Anuj, 2013. "Edgeworth equilibria: separable and non-separable commodity spaces," MPRA Paper 46796, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Bhowmik, Anuj & Cao, Jiling, 2013. "Robust efficiency in mixed economies with asymmetric information," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 49-57.
    7. Evren, Özgür & Hüsseinov, Farhad, 2008. "Theorems on the core of an economy with infinitely many commodities and consumers," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(11), pages 1180-1196, December.
    8. Basile, Achille & Donnini, Chiara & Graziano, Maria Gabriella, 2009. "Core and equilibria in coalitional asymmetric information economies," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3-4), pages 293-307, March.
    9. Michael Greinecker & Konrad Podczeck, 2016. "Edgeworth’s conjecture and the number of agents and commodities," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 62(1), pages 93-130, June.
    10. Charalambos Aliprantis & Kim Border & Owen Burkinshaw, 1996. "Market economies with many commodities," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 19(1), pages 113-185, March.
    11. Anuj Bhowmik & Jiling Cao, 2013. "On the core and Walrasian expectations equilibrium in infinite dimensional commodity spaces," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 53(3), pages 537-560, August.
    12. Bhowmik, Anuj & Centrone, Francesca & Martellotti, Anna, 2019. "Coalitional extreme desirability in finitely additive economies with asymmetric information," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 83-93.
    13. Ostroy, Joseph M & Zame, William R, 1994. "Nonatomic Economies and the Boundaries of Perfect Competition," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 593-633, May.
    14. Achille Basile & Maria Gabriella Graziano & Ciro Tarantino, 2018. "Coalitional fairness with participation rates," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 123(2), pages 97-139, March.
    15. Monteiro, P. K. & Araújo, Aloísio Pessoa de & Martins-da-Rocha, Victor Filipe, 2003. "Equilibria in security markets with a continuum of agents," FGV EPGE Economics Working Papers (Ensaios Economicos da EPGE) 513, EPGE Brazilian School of Economics and Finance - FGV EPGE (Brazil).
    16. Niccolò Urbinati, 2023. "The Walrasian objection mechanism and Mas-Colell’s bargaining set in economies with many commodities," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 76(1), pages 45-68, July.
    17. Bhowmik, Anuj & Graziano, Maria Gabriella, 2015. "On Vind’s theorem for an economy with atoms and infinitely many commodities," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 26-36.
    18. Tourky, Rabee & Yannelis, Nicholas C., 2001. "Markets with Many More Agents than Commodities: Aumann's "Hidden" Assumption," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 189-221, November.
    19. Jiuqiang Liu, 2022. "Equivalence of Competitive Equilibria, Fuzzy Cores, and Fuzzy Bargaining Sets in Finite Production Economies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(18), pages 1-16, September.
    20. Herves-Beloso, Carlos & Moreno-Garcia, Emma & Nunez-Sanz, Carmelo & Rui Pascoa, Mario, 2000. "Blocking Efficacy of Small Coalitions in Myopic Economies," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 72-86, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:mateco:v:73:y:2017:i:c:p:54-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jmateco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.