IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matcom/v98y2014icp18-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Double-looped maximum likelihood estimation for the parameters of the generalized gamma distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Yilmaz, Hulya
  • Sazak, Hakan S.

Abstract

The generalized gamma distribution (GGD) is a very popular distribution since it includes many well known distributions. Estimation of the parameters of the GGD is quite problematic because of the complicated structure of its density function. We introduce two new estimation methods called maximum likelihood with goodness of fit test (MLGOFT) and double-looped maximum likelihood (ML) estimation. We show through simulations under several situations that the MLGOFT method is more efficient than the Method of Moments with goodness of fit test (MMGOFT) technique especially for small and moderate sample sizes whereas the double-looped ML is the superior estimation method for all cases. The double-looped ML method is also very fast, practical and straightforward.

Suggested Citation

  • Yilmaz, Hulya & Sazak, Hakan S., 2014. "Double-looped maximum likelihood estimation for the parameters of the generalized gamma distribution," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 18-30.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:98:y:2014:i:c:p:18-30
    DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2013.12.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378475413003042
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.matcom.2013.12.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gomes, O. & Combes, C. & Dussauchoy, A., 2008. "Parameter estimation of the generalized gamma distribution," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 79(4), pages 955-963.
    2. Hirose, Hideo, 2000. "Maximum likelihood parameter estimation by model augmentation with applications to the extended four-parameter generalized gamma distribution," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 81-97.
    3. Manning, Willard G. & Basu, Anirban & Mullahy, John, 2005. "Generalized modeling approaches to risk adjustment of skewed outcomes data," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 465-488, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Combes, Catherine & Ng, Hon Keung Tony, 2022. "On parameter estimation for Amoroso family of distributions," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 309-327.
    2. Volkan Soner Özsoy & Mehmet Güray Ünsal & H. Hasan Örkcü, 2020. "Use of the heuristic optimization in the parameter estimation of generalized gamma distribution: comparison of GA, DE, PSO and SA methods," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 1895-1925, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Combes, Catherine & Ng, Hon Keung Tony, 2022. "On parameter estimation for Amoroso family of distributions," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 309-327.
    2. Cynthia Tojeiro & Francisco Louzada, 2012. "A general threshold stress hybrid hazard model for lifetime data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 833-848, November.
    3. Han, Lili & Wu, Fangxiang & Sheng, Jie & Ding, Feng, 2012. "Two recursive least squares parameter estimation algorithms for multirate multiple-input systems by using the auxiliary model," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 82(5), pages 777-789.
    4. Sankar Mukhopadhyay & Wei Yang & Wai Lee & Jeanne Wendel, 2008. "Analyzing the impact of prenatal care on infant health: do we have useful input and output measures?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 9(22), pages 1-14.
    5. Courbage, Christophe & Rey, Béatrice, 2012. "Priority setting in health care and higher order degree change in risk," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 484-489.
    6. Jones, A.M, 2010. "Models For Health Care," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 10/01, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    7. Caballer-Tarazona, Vicent & Guadalajara-Olmeda, Natividad & Vivas-Consuelo, David, 2019. "Predicting healthcare expenditure by multimorbidity groups," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(4), pages 427-434.
    8. Onur Başer & Joseph C. Gardiner & Cathy J. Bradley & Hüseyin Yüce & Charles Given, 2006. "Longitudinal analysis of censored medical cost data," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(5), pages 513-525, May.
    9. Toni Mora & Joan Gil & Antoni Sicras-Mainar, 2012. "The Influence of BMI, Obesity and Overweight on Medical Costs: A Panel Data Approach," Working Papers 2012-08, FEDEA.
    10. Liu, Lei & Strawderman, Robert L. & Cowen, Mark E. & Shih, Ya-Chen T., 2010. "A flexible two-part random effects model for correlated medical costs," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 110-123, January.
    11. Jean‐Paul Chaze, 2005. "Assessing household health expenditure with Box–Cox censoring models," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(9), pages 893-907, September.
    12. Keane, Michael & Stavrunova, Olena, 2016. "Adverse selection, moral hazard and the demand for Medigap insurance," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 190(1), pages 62-78.
    13. Laurent Carnis & Hamza Achit, 2014. "The injured victim's health care spending: is there an effect of the origin of accident?," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(5), pages 350-355, March.
    14. Tor Iversen & Eline Aas & Gunnar Rosenqvist & Unto Häkkinen & on behalf of the EuroHOPE study group, 2015. "Comparative Analysis of Treatment Costs in EUROHOPE," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(S2), pages 5-22, December.
    15. Toni Mora & Joan Gil & Antoni Sicras-Mainar, 2015. "The influence of obesity and overweight on medical costs: a panel data perspective," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 16(2), pages 161-173, March.
    16. Marcel Bilger & Willard G. Manning, 2015. "Measuring Overfitting In Nonlinear Models: A New Method And An Application To Health Expenditures," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(1), pages 75-85, January.
    17. Manning, Willard G. & Basu, Anirban & Mullahy, John, 2005. "Generalized modeling approaches to risk adjustment of skewed outcomes data," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 465-488, May.
    18. Willams B. F. da Silva & Pedro M. Almeida‐Junior & Abraão D. C. Nascimento, 2023. "Generalized gamma ARMA process for synthetic aperture radar amplitude and intensity data," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(7), November.
    19. Dunn, Abe, 2016. "Health insurance and the demand for medical care: Instrumental variable estimates using health insurer claims data," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 74-88.
    20. Kaushik Ghosh & Irina Bondarenko & Kassandra L Messer & Susan T Stewart & Trivellore Raghunathan & Allison B Rosen & David M Cutler, 2020. "Attributing medical spending to conditions: A comparison of methods," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:98:y:2014:i:c:p:18-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/mathematics-and-computers-in-simulation/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.