IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v60y2015icp318-324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tracking the movement of fish: Skippers׳ logbooks and contestations over ways of knowing the sea

Author

Listed:
  • Anderson, Tarryn-Anne

Abstract

Skippers׳ logbooks have two lives – one of production and one of dissemination – which each serve different outcomes. This is further complicated by the dual use of the logbooks as it is disseminated within the South African Department of Forestry and Fisheries to simultaneously gather data about the resource, and enforce management regulations on fishers. Moreover, throughout the processes of production of logbooks, the embodied ways in which skippers and fishers know the sea is concretised and reduced, leading to a “distilled” version of so‐called “fishers׳ knowledge” which little resembles the ways in which fishers know the sea, nor how they assemble those ways of knowing. Where reduction of knowledge is not possible, notes are recorded on the margins of logbooks. This further demonstrates the difficulties involved in attempting to translate one way of knowing into another. The ways in which these notes, created during the process of production, are dealt with during dissemination is also a telling indicator of the tension between scientific knowledge of the sea and embodied knowledge of the sea. Science has been traditionally used to manage data, and not people, but it has become part of a democratic process where some kinds of governance are based on, and motivated by, scientific claims and principles. This article will argue that in a democratic process, where participation and communication is paramount, the treating of fishers merely as a dataproducer, rather than a legitimate knower in their own right, is not useful, productive, or representative of reality. The question then becomes how better to ensure the active participation of fishers in the process of fisheries research in ways that will positively affect fisheries management. In order to strive for truly participatory research in fisheries, it is necessary not to work to ׳bridge׳ the gaps of disconnect, but rather to realise the strength of the points of connection, where these exist as a veritable knot of knowledge practices, performances, ideas and concepts, which co-produce each other.

Suggested Citation

  • Anderson, Tarryn-Anne, 2015. "Tracking the movement of fish: Skippers׳ logbooks and contestations over ways of knowing the sea," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 318-324.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:60:y:2015:i:c:p:318-324
    DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.09.028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X14002619
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.09.028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sowman, Merle, 2006. "Subsistence and small-scale fisheries in South Africa: A ten-year review," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 60-73, January.
    2. Isaacs, Moenieba, 2006. "Small-scale fisheries reform: Expectations, hopes and dreams of "a better life for all"," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 51-59, January.
    3. van Sittert, Lance, 2002. ""Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it": comparing fisheries reforms in South Africa," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 295-305, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sowman, Merle & Sunde, Jackie & Raemaekers, Serge & Schultz, Oliver, 2014. "Fishing for equality: Policy for poverty alleviation for South Africa's small-scale fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 31-42.
    2. de Coning, Eve & Witbooi, Emma, 2015. "Towards a new’fisheries crime’ paradigm: South Africa as an illustrative example," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 208-215.
    3. Visser, M. & Burns, J., 2015. "Inequality, social sanctions and cooperation within South African fishing communities," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 95-109.
    4. Schultz, Oliver J., 2015. "Defiance and obedience: Regulatory compliance among artisanal fishers in St Helena Bay," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 331-337.
    5. Tsele T. Nthane & Fred Saunders & Gloria L. Gallardo Fernández & Serge Raemaekers, 2020. "Toward Sustainability of South African Small-Scale Fisheries Leveraging ICT Transformation Pathways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, January.
    6. Visser, Martine & Burns, Justine, 2013. "Inequality, Social Sanctions and Cooperation within South African Fishing," SALDRU Working Papers 117, Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town.
    7. Leopoldo Cavaleri Gerhardinger & Elyse Mills & Beatriz Mesquita & Vivienne Solis Rivera & Henrique Calori Kefalás & Andre Carlo Colonese, 2023. "Challenging the Blue Economy: Voices from Artisanal Fishing Communities in Latin America and the Caribbean," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 66(1), pages 95-104, June.
    8. Green, Lesley, 2015. "Fisheries science, Parliament and fishers׳ knowledge in South Africa: An attempt at scholarly diplomacy," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 345-352.
    9. Mafaniso M. Hara, 2014. "Analysis of South African Commercial Traditional Linefish Snoek Value Chain," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 29(3), pages 279-299.
    10. Ward, Michelle & Possingham, Hugh & Rhodes, Jonathan R. & Mumby, Peter, 2018. "Food, money and lobsters: Valuing ecosystem services to align environmental management with Sustainable Development Goals," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PA), pages 56-69.
    11. Cochrane, K.L. & Oliver, B. & Sauer, W., 2014. "An assessment of the current status of the chokka squid fishery in South Africa and an evaluation of alternative allocation strategies," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 149-163.
    12. Thando Vilakazi & Stefano Ponte, 2022. "Black Economic Empowerment and Quota Allocations in South Africa's Industrial Fisheries," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(5), pages 1059-1086, September.
    13. Cooper, Rachel & Leiman, Anthony & Jarre, Astrid, 2014. "An analysis of the structural changes in the offshore demersal hake (Merluccius capensis and M. paradoxus) trawl fishery in South Africa," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PA), pages 270-279.
    14. Faria, Silvana & Macuéria, Marisa & Mosley, Benjamin & Teodósio, M. Alexandra & Baptista, Vânia, 2021. "Characterization Of Small-Scale Fishing Activity In Luanda Bay (Angola)," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 9(3), pages 225-238.
    15. Sundström, Aksel, 2016. "Corruption and Violations of Conservation Rules: A Survey Experiment with Resource Users," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 73-83.
    16. Colbert-Sangree, Nathanial & Suter, Jordan F., 2015. "Community based fishery management within the Menai Bay conservation area: A survey of the resource user," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 171-177.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:60:y:2015:i:c:p:318-324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.