IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v59y2015icp16-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use and misuse of CITES as a management tool for commercially-exploited aquatic species

Author

Listed:
  • Cochrane, Kevern

Abstract

The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) is an international agreement aimed at ensuring that international trade in wild animals and plants does not endanger the survival of species. Application of the Convention has proven to be controversial in some instances, including in the regulation of certain commercially-exploited aquatic species. Some countries hold differing views on the desirable role of CITES for such species and under what circumstances they should be listed on a CITES Appendix. In the late 1990s increasing concerns by some CITES parties about the status of some important resources for fisheries led to a review by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the CITES listing criteria for application to these species and the process of decision-making on listing proposals. The key FAO recommendations were incorporated into revised listing criteria adopted by CITES in 2004. The regular assessment of listing proposals for aquatic species by FAO-convened Expert Panels was also initiated at that time. These developments have not resolved the underlying differences of opinion and, in contrast, became an additional target of controversy. CITES Parties on both sides of the issue have tended to use the FAO recommended criteria and Panel assessments selectively, following them when they have matched their own preferences on specific proposals and circumventing or challenging them when they have not. This paper examines the attitudes and objectives of countries in relation to the use of CITES and the role of scientific information in policy and decision-making. It notes that differences in the opinions of countries on fundamental issues remain unresolved. These include the appropriate relationship between CITES and national and regional fisheries management agencies and the potential contribution of regulation of trade to fisheries management. The paper concludes with several recommendations aimed at improving the effective and efficient use of the Convention, in particular that greater attention should be given to the likely effectiveness of listing commercially-exploited species on CITES when deciding on listing proposals.

Suggested Citation

  • Cochrane, Kevern, 2015. "Use and misuse of CITES as a management tool for commercially-exploited aquatic species," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 16-31.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:59:y:2015:i:c:p:16-31
    DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.04.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X15000974
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.04.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Gehring & Eva Ruffing, 2008. "When Arguments Prevail Over Power: The CITES Procedure for the Listing of Endangered Species," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 8(2), pages 123-148, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seul-Ye Lim & Se-Jun Jin & Seung-Hoon Yoo, 2017. "The Economic Benefits of the Dokdo Seals Restoration Project in Korea: A Contingent Valuation Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vincent Nijman & Chris R Shepherd, 2011. "The Role of Thailand in the International Trade in CITES-Listed Live Reptiles and Amphibians," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(3), pages 1-7, March.
    2. Gary D. Libecap, 2013. "Addressing Global Environmental Externalities: Transaction Costs Considerations," NBER Working Papers 19501, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Heid, Benedikt & Márquez-Ramos, Laura, 2023. "International environmental agreements and imperfect enforcement: Evidence from CITES," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    4. Gary D. Libecap, 2014. "Addressing Global Environmental Externalities: Transaction Costs Considerations," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 52(2), pages 424-479, June.
    5. Alfie ChristopherByron Gaffney & Darrick Evensen, 2020. "Addressing the Elephant in the Room: Learning from CITESCoP17," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 20(1), pages 3-10, February.
    6. Thomas Gehring & Linda Spielmann, 2023. "The treaty management organization established under the UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement: an international actor in its own right?," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 235-252, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:59:y:2015:i:c:p:16-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.