IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v58y2015icp98-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Youth and the sea: Ocean literacy in Nova Scotia, Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Guest, Haley
  • Lotze, Heike K.
  • Wallace, Douglas

Abstract

Improving public awareness about the ocean can benefit the environment, economy, and society. However, low levels of ‘ocean literacy’ have been identified in many countries and can be a barrier for citizens to engage in environmentally responsible behavior or consider ocean-related careers. This study assessed the level of ocean valuation, knowledge, interaction and interest of public school students grade 7–12 (ages 12–18) in Nova Scotia, Canada, a region with strong connections with the sea. A survey was used in 11 public schools, with a total of 723 students participating in a quiz and survey. Many quiz questions were aligned with the ‘Ocean Literacy Principles’ established by the Ocean Literacy Campaign in the United States. Although the average quiz score was below 50%, students reported a high valuation of the marine environment and diverse interest in the oceans, including jobs and careers. There was a distinct difference in knowledge of biology-related questions and abiotic-related questions, with students having more knowledge of and interest in topics concerning ocean life. A significant positive correlation between knowledge and value indicated that ocean-literate students might value the marine environment more strongly. Students reporting greater interaction with the ocean also demonstrated higher knowledge levels, and students with higher knowledge levels were more likely to be interested in ocean-related jobs and careers. Participants׳ high valuation of the marine environment and interest in ocean jobs and careers suggests important links between ocean literacy and environmental and economic benefit, respectively. Enhancing interactions with the ocean through experiential learning could be the most effective way of improving ocean literacy as well as marine citizen- and stewardship.

Suggested Citation

  • Guest, Haley & Lotze, Heike K. & Wallace, Douglas, 2015. "Youth and the sea: Ocean literacy in Nova Scotia, Canada," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 98-107.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:58:y:2015:i:c:p:98-107
    DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.04.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X15000895
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.04.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McKinley, Emma & Fletcher, Stephen, 2012. "Improving marine environmental health through marine citizenship: A call for debate," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 839-843.
    2. Costanza, Robert, 1999. "The ecological, economic, and social importance of the oceans," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 199-213, November.
    3. Fletcher, Stephen & Potts, Jonathan S. & Heeps, Carolyn & Pike, Kate, 2009. "Public awareness of marine environmental issues in the UK," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 370-375, March.
    4. Jefferson, R.L. & Bailey, I. & Laffoley, D. d′A. & Richards, J.P. & Attrill, M.J., 2014. "Public perceptions of the UK marine environment," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 327-337.
    5. Eddy, Tyler D., 2014. "One hundred-fold difference between perceived and actual levels of marine protection in New Zealand," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 61-67.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna C. M. Queiroz & Géraldine Fauville & Adina T. Abeles & Aaron Levett & Jeremy N. Bailenson, 2023. "The Efficacy of Virtual Reality in Climate Change Education Increases with Amount of Body Movement and Message Specificity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Heike Schwermer & Alexandra M. Blöcker & Christian Möllmann & Martin Döring, 2021. "The ‘Cod-Multiple’: Modes of Existence of Fish, Science and People," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-29, November.
    3. Debbrota Mallick & Eric Po Keung Tsang & John Chi-Kin Lee & Chi Chiu Cheang, 2023. "Marine Environmental Knowledge and Attitudes among University Students in Hong Kong: An Application of the Ocean Literacy Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Melita Mokos & Giulia Realdon & Ivana Zubak Čižmek, 2020. "How to Increase Ocean Literacy for Future Ocean Sustainability? The Influence of Non-Formal Marine Science Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Cheng-Chieh Chang, 2019. "Development of Ocean Literacy Inventory for 16- to 18-Year-Old Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, April.
    6. Eleiton, Nalumu Elizabeth & Corless, Rebecca. & Hynes, Stephen, 2015. "Public Perceptions of Marine Environmental Issues: A Review," Working Papers 262590, National University of Ireland, Galway, Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit.
    7. Guang-Ying Liu & Yi-Chen Lin & Ting-Kuang Yeh, 2023. "Motivating Individuals to Take Responsible Ocean Action: The Mediatory Effects of Attitude toward the Ocean," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-12, February.
    8. Cheng-Chieh Chang & Thakkar Chandni Hirenkumar & Chin-Kuo Wu, 2021. "The Concept of Ocean Sustainability in Formal Education—Comparative Ocean Literacy Coverage Analysis of the Educational Standards of India and the USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neilson, Alasdair, 2018. "Considering the importance of metaphors for marine conservation," MarXiv rhefa, Center for Open Science.
    2. Eleiton, Nalumu Elizabeth & Corless, Rebecca. & Hynes, Stephen, 2015. "Public Perceptions of Marine Environmental Issues: A Review," Working Papers 262590, National University of Ireland, Galway, Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit.
    3. Caroline Schio & Pedro Reis, 2024. "Design of a Pedagogical Model to Foster Ocean Citizenship in Basic Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Basurko, Oihane C. & Gabiña, Gorka & Andrés, Marga & Rubio, Anna & Uriarte, Ainhize & Krug, Iñigo, 2015. "Fishing for floating marine litter in SE Bay of Biscay: Review and feasibility study," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 103-112.
    5. Rabia Yahia Meddah & Tarik Ghodbani & Rachida Senouci & Walid Rabehi & Lia Duarte & Ana Cláudia Teodoro, 2023. "Estimation of the Coastal Vulnerability Index Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making: The Coastal Social–Ecological System of Rachgoun, Western Algeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-28, August.
    6. Kahmann, Birte & Stumpf, Klara Helene & Baumgärtner, Stefan, 2015. "Notions of justice held by stakeholders of the Newfoundland fishery," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 37-50.
    7. Alexis Gutierrez & Thomas F. Thornton, 2014. "Can Consumers Understand Sustainability through Seafood Eco-Labels? A U.S. and UK Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-23, November.
    8. Frisch, L.C. & Mathis, J.T. & Kettle, N.P. & Trainor, S.F., 2015. "Gauging perceptions of ocean acidification in Alaska," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 101-110.
    9. Slater, Anne-Michelle & Irvine, Katherine N & Byg, Anja A. & Davies, Ian M. & Gubbins, Matt & Kafas, Andronikos & Kenter, Jasper & MacDonald, Alison & O'Hara Murray, Rory & Potts, Tavis & Tweddle, Jac, 2020. "Integrating stakeholder knowledge through modular cooperative participatory processes for marine spatial planning outcomes (CORPORATES)," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    10. Ferdinando Nunziata & Andrea Buono & Maurizio Migliaccio, 2018. "COSMO–SkyMed Synthetic Aperture Radar Data to Observe the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Ruiz-Frau, A. & Krause, T. & Marbà, N., 2018. "The use of sociocultural valuation in sustainable environmental management," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PA), pages 158-167.
    12. Yongtao Gan & Jian Gao & Jiahao Zhang & Xia Wu & Tian Zhang & Mengjun Shao, 2022. "University Students’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Related to Marine Environment Pollution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Heleen Middel & Francesca Verones, 2017. "Making Marine Noise Pollution Impacts Heard: The Case of Cetaceans in the North Sea within Life Cycle Impact Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-17, June.
    14. Watson, Stephen C.L. & Paterson, David M. & Queirós, Ana M. & Rees, Andrew P. & Stephens, Nicholas & Widdicombe, Stephen & Beaumont, Nicola J., 2016. "A conceptual framework for assessing the ecosystem service of waste remediation: In the marine environment," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 69-81.
    15. Burdon, D. & Potts, T. & McKinley, E. & Lew, S. & Shilland, R. & Gormley, K. & Thomson, S. & Forster, R., 2019. "Expanding the role of participatory mapping to assess ecosystem service provision in local coastal environments," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    16. Anne-Mette Hjalager & Grzegorz Kwiatkowski, 2019. "Relational Environmentalism in Coastal Recreation and Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Eddy, Tyler D., 2014. "One hundred-fold difference between perceived and actual levels of marine protection in New Zealand," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 61-67.
    18. Zhou, Jing & Cao, Jingsheng & Yu, Ying, 2023. "Green recovery determination: Interlinkage of international trade, crude oil price volatility, and economic performance," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    19. Lucia Bosone & Raquel Bertoldo, 2022. "The Greater the Contact, the Closer the Threat: The Influence of Contact with Nature on the Social Perception of Biodiversity Loss and the Effectiveness of Conservation Behaviours," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    20. Börger, Tobias & Hattam, Caroline, 2017. "Motivations matter: Behavioural determinants of preferences for remote and unfamiliar environmental goods," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 64-74.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:58:y:2015:i:c:p:98-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.