IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v57y2015icp158-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the basic elements of transparency of regional fisheries management organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Clark, Nichola A.
  • Ardron, Jeff A.
  • Pendleton, Linwood H.

Abstract

This paper reports on the first global study of regional fisheries management organization (RFMO) transparency. It was prompted by recent scholarship that suggests that RFMOs are failing to meet their conservation and management mandates and that transparency is a critical element of this performance. In this study, 11 RFMOs were evaluated using 34 questions, divided into three sections: (i) access to full, up-to-date and accurate information; (ii) public participation in decision-making; and (iii) access to outcomes. Secretariats for all 11 RFMOs were contacted, and all responded, to correct and comment on initial findings and to share additional information. The total scores in this study reflect transparency as measured against current good practices in RFMOs as a whole, rather than some sort of idealistic benchmark. Each question should therefore be seen as a diagnostic tool that shows where some RFMO(s) fall short and how they can correct the shortfall based on the practices of their peers. These results have highlighted a number of good practices amongst RFMOs, with no single RFMO standing out as having particularly poor transparency practices. On the other hand, there also were not any RFMOs that had exemplary transparency practices in every respect and all RFMOs still have room to improve upon their basic transparency practices. This first transparency assessment is necessarily broad in nature and considers only very basic elements of transparency. It is to be expected that as RFMO practices become more sophisticated, so will the techniques and criteria of future transparency assessments.

Suggested Citation

  • Clark, Nichola A. & Ardron, Jeff A. & Pendleton, Linwood H., 2015. "Evaluating the basic elements of transparency of regional fisheries management organizations," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 158-166.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:57:y:2015:i:c:p:158-166
    DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X15000524
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cullis-Suzuki, Sarika & Pauly, Daniel, 2010. "Failing the high seas: A global evaluation of regional fisheries management organizations," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1036-1042, September.
    2. Englender, Dorota & Kirschey, Jenny & Stöfen, Aleke & Zink, Andreas, 2014. "Cooperation and compliance control in areas beyond national jurisdiction," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 186-194.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hussain Sinan & Megan Bailey, 2020. "Understanding Barriers in Indian Ocean Tuna Commission Allocation Negotiations on Fishing Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Betty Purwandari & Latifatul Khairiyah & Mardiana Purwaningsih & Achmad Nizar Hidayanto & Nur Fitriah Ayuning Budi & Kongkiti Phusavat, 2023. "Why do people donate online? A perspective from dual credibility transfer," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 20(2), pages 393-425, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ardron, Jeff A. & Rayfuse, Rosemary & Gjerde, Kristina & Warner, Robin, 2014. "The sustainable use and conservation of biodiversity in ABNJ: What can be achieved using existing international agreements?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 98-108.
    2. Hussain Sinan & Megan Bailey, 2020. "Understanding Barriers in Indian Ocean Tuna Commission Allocation Negotiations on Fishing Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Crow White & Christopher Costello, 2014. "Close the High Seas to Fishing?," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-5, March.
    4. Galaz, Victor & Crona, Beatrice & Österblom, Henrik & Olsson, Per & Folke, Carl, 2012. "Polycentric systems and interacting planetary boundaries — Emerging governance of climate change–ocean acidification–marine biodiversity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 21-32.
    5. Matz-Lück, Nele & Fuchs, Johannes, 2014. "The impact of OSPAR on protected area management beyond national jurisdiction: Effective regional cooperation or a network of paper parks?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 155-166.
    6. Changping Zhao & Maliyamu Sadula & Xiangmeng Huang & Yali Yang & Yu Gong & Shuai Yang, 2022. "The Game Model of Blue Carbon Collaboration along MSR—From the Regret Theory Perspective," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Martin Bohle & Cornelia E. Nauen & Eduardo Marone, 2019. "Ethics to Intersect Civic Participation and Formal Guidance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Bianca Haas & Marcus Haward & Jeffrey McGee & Aysha Fleming, 2021. "Explicit targets and cooperation: regional fisheries management organizations and the sustainable development goals," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 133-145, March.
    9. Jacques, Peter J., 2015. "Are world fisheries a global panarchy?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 165-170.
    10. Gars, Johan & Spiro, Daniel, 2014. "Uninsurance through Trade," Memorandum 13/2014, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    11. Selles Jules & Bonhommeau Sylvain & Guillotreau Patrice & Vallée Thomas, 2020. "Can the Threat of Economic Sanctions Ensure the Sustainability of International Fisheries? An Experiment of a Dynamic Non-cooperative CPR Game with Uncertain Tipping Point," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(1), pages 153-176, May.
    12. Paul Hallwood, 2016. "International Public Law and the Failure to Efficiently Manage Ocean Living Resources," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(2), pages 131-139.
    13. Mervin Ogawa & Joseph Anthony L. Reyes, 2021. "Assessment of Regional Fisheries Management Organizations Efforts toward the Precautionary Approach and Science-Based Stock Management and Compliance Measures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-24, July.
    14. Louise Teh & Vicky Lam & William Cheung & Dana Miller & Lydia Teh & U. Rashid Sumaila, 2017. "Impact of high seas closure on food security in low-income fish-dependent countries," Chapters, in: Paulo A.L.D. Nunes & Lisa E. Svensson & Anil Markandya (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Management of Sustainable Oceans, chapter 11, pages 232-262, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Bianca Haas & Marcus Haward & Jeffrey McGee & Aysha Fleming, 0. "Explicit targets and cooperation: regional fisheries management organizations and the sustainable development goals," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-13.
    16. Héloïse Berkowitz & Larry B. Crowder & Cassandra M Brooks, 2020. "Organizational Perspectives On Oceans Governance: Meta-Organizations And Cross-Sectoral Collective Action," Post-Print hal-02872175, HAL.
    17. María-José Gutiérrez & Belén Inguanzo, 2019. "Contributing to Fisheries Sustainability: Inequality Analysis in the High Seas Catches of Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, June.
    18. Gary D. Libecap, 2013. "Addressing Global Environmental Externalities: Transaction Costs Considerations," NBER Working Papers 19501, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Manuel Pacheco Coelho & José António Filipe, 2021. "Searching for a New Model of Governance in the High Seas: Game Theory Applied to International Commons Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-28, October.
    20. Matilda Petersson & Peter Stoett, 2022. "Lessons learnt in global biodiversity governance," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 333-352, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:57:y:2015:i:c:p:158-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.