IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v51y2015icp136-147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of important marine areas around the Japanese Archipelago: Establishment of a protocol for evaluating a broad area using ecologically and biologically significant areas selection criteria

Author

Listed:
  • Yamakita, Takehisa
  • Yamamoto, Hiroyuki
  • Nakaoka, Masahiro
  • Yamano, Hiroya
  • Fujikura, Katsunori
  • Hidaka, Kiyotaka
  • Hirota, Yuichi
  • Ichikawa, Tadafumi
  • Kakehi, Shigeho
  • Kameda, Takahiko
  • Kitajima, Satoshi
  • Kogure, Kazuhiro
  • Komatsu, Teruhisa
  • Kumagai, Naoki H.
  • Miyamoto, Hiroomi
  • Miyashita, Kazushi
  • Morimoto, Haruyuki
  • Nakajima, Ryota
  • Nishida, Shuhei
  • Nishiuchi, Kou
  • Sakamoto, Shingo
  • Sano, Masayoshi
  • Sudo, Kenji
  • Sugisaki, Hiroya
  • Tadokoro, Kazuaki
  • Tanaka, Katsuhiko
  • Jintsu-Uchifune, Yoshie
  • Watanabe, Kentaro
  • Watanabe, Hiromi
  • Yara, Yumiko
  • Yotsukura, Norishige
  • Shirayama, Yoshihisa

Abstract

After the adoption of the Aichi Target, data accumulation and evaluation regarding biodiversity have progressed rapidly. The use of ecologically and biologically significant areas (EBSAs) criteria to evaluate important areas enables the identification of effective and prioritized areas for ecosystem management. This includes strategic environmental assessment and discussions aimed at establishing protected marine areas based on scientific data. This paper reviews previous and current ideas as well as the methods used, for the identification of EBSAs. In particular, the following issues are addressed: problems associated with different types of marine ecosystems in the Japanese Archipelago, such as seagrass and seaweed beds, coral reefs, offshore pelagic plankton, and deep-sea benthic ecosystems; and problems associated with the integration of multiple criteria that are not totally exclusive. Several candidate variables accounting for each of the 7 criteria used to identify ecologically important areas are presented. Data availability is the most important criterion that allowed for the comprehensive evaluation of different types of ecosystems in the same localities. In particular, for coastal ecosystems such as seagrass, seaweed beds, and coral reefs, it is possible to carry out broad spatial comparisons using variables representing most of these 7 criteria. Regarding methods for the quantitative evaluation of each criterion and their integration, application of these methods to kelp forest ecosystems in Hokkaido, Northern Japan is presented as a case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Yamakita, Takehisa & Yamamoto, Hiroyuki & Nakaoka, Masahiro & Yamano, Hiroya & Fujikura, Katsunori & Hidaka, Kiyotaka & Hirota, Yuichi & Ichikawa, Tadafumi & Kakehi, Shigeho & Kameda, Takahiko & Kitaj, 2015. "Identification of important marine areas around the Japanese Archipelago: Establishment of a protocol for evaluating a broad area using ecologically and biologically significant areas selection criter," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 136-147.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:51:y:2015:i:c:p:136-147
    DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.07.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X14001833
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.07.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dunn, Daniel C. & Ardron, Jeff & Bax, Nicholas & Bernal, Patricio & Cleary, Jesse & Cresswell, Ian & Donnelly, Ben & Dunstan, Piers & Gjerde, Kristina & Johnson, David & Kaschner, Kristin & Lascelles,, 2014. "The Convention on Biological Diversity's Ecologically or Biologically Significant Areas: Origins, development, and current status," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 137-145.
    2. Levy, Jessica S. & Ban, Natalie C., 2013. "A method for incorporating climate change modelling into marine conservation planning: An Indo-west Pacific example," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 16-24.
    3. Bundy, Alida & Davis, Anthony, 2013. "Knowing in context: An exploration of the interface of marine harvesters' local ecological knowledge with ecosystem approaches to management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 277-286.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Voyer, Michelle & Gollan, Natalie & Barclay, Kate & Gladstone, William, 2015. "‘It׳s part of me’; understanding the values, images and principles of coastal users and their influence on the social acceptability of MPAs," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 93-102.
    2. Kaiser, Brooks A. & Bakanev, Sergey & Bertelsen, Rasmus Gjedsø & Carson, Marcus & Eide, Arne & Fernandez, Linda & Halpin, Patrick & Izmalkov, Sergei & Kyhn, Line A. & Österblom, Henrik & Punt, Maarten, 2015. "Spatial issues in Arctic marine resource governance workshop summary and comment," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-5.
    3. Yu-Pin Lin & Chi-Ju Chen & Wan-Yu Lien & Wen-Hao Chang & Joy R. Petway & Li-Chi Chiang, 2019. "Landscape Conservation Planning to Sustain Ecosystem Services under Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Martin, C.S. & Tolley, M.J. & Farmer, E. & Mcowen, C.J. & Geffert, J.L. & Scharlemann, J.P.W. & Thomas, H.L. & van Bochove, J.H. & Stanwell-Smith, D. & Hutton, J.M. & Lascelles, B. & Pilgrim, J.D. & E, 2015. "A global map to aid the identification and screening of critical habitat for marine industries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 45-53.
    5. Céline Gomez & Ashley J Williams & Simon J Nicol & Camille Mellin & Kim L Loeun & Corey J A Bradshaw, 2015. "Species Distribution Models of Tropical Deep-Sea Snappers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Ardron, Jeff A. & Rayfuse, Rosemary & Gjerde, Kristina & Warner, Robin, 2014. "The sustainable use and conservation of biodiversity in ABNJ: What can be achieved using existing international agreements?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 98-108.
    7. Manuel Pacheco Coelho & José António Filipe, 2021. "Searching for a New Model of Governance in the High Seas: Game Theory Applied to International Commons Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-28, October.
    8. Qin Li & Yunlong Sun & Zifei Liu & Bo Ning & Zhilong Wu, 2024. "Spatial Distribution, Influencing Factors and Sustainable Development of Fishery Cultural Resources in the Yangtze River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Hao Huang & Dongmei Tang & Bin Chen & Weiwen Li & Danyun Ou & Lei Wang & Lina An, 2019. "Short Comments on the Application of Criteria for Identifying Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Zhengsong Lin & Xue Wang & Jihui Yuan & Yuhui Gui, 2024. "Virtual Reality-Based Digital Landscape Experience and Climate Change Monitoring: Evidence from Human Thermal Comfort," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-20, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:51:y:2015:i:c:p:136-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.