IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v36y2012i2p528-535.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effectiveness of the ISM Code: A qualitative enquiry

Author

Listed:
  • Bhattacharya, Syamantak

Abstract

Studies conducted to determine the efficacy of the ISM Code in the past include investigations of the trends of accident numbers and insurance claims and users' perceptions. None of these, however, could produce a definitive conclusion. This is because both the use of safety outcome as well as the use of perception have inherent problems and are not reliable. This paper takes a different approach. It draws on wider research on management of workplace health and safety to ascertain whether or not employment and social conditions that support effective implementation of self-regulation are present in the maritime context. The findings reveal a considerable disparity between managers' and seafarers' understanding of the use of the Code resulting in a wide gap between its intended purpose and practice. The analysis shows that the critical factor is the lack of seafarers' participation in management of workplace health and safety. The underlying causal factors for such lack of participation were located in seafarers' poor employment condition and low-trust relationship with their managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhattacharya, Syamantak, 2012. "The effectiveness of the ISM Code: A qualitative enquiry," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 528-535.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:36:y:2012:i:2:p:528-535
    DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2011.09.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X11001497
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.marpol.2011.09.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emre Akyuz & Hristos Karahalios & Metin Celik, 2015. "Assessment of the maritime labour convention compliance using balanced scorecard and analytic hierarchy process approach," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 145-162, February.
    2. Samuel Akpovwre Eyenubo & Mudzamir Mohammed & Mohammad Ali, 2017. "Audit Committee Effectiveness of Financial Reporting Quality in Listed companies in Nigeria Stock Exchange," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(6), pages 487-505, June.
    3. Angelos Pantouvakis & Maria Karakasnaki, 2016. "An empirical assessment of ISM Code effectiveness on performance: the role of ISO certification," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(7), pages 874-886, October.
    4. Syamantak Bhattacharya & Lijun Tang, 2013. "Fatigued for safety? Supply chain occupational health and safety initiatives in shipping," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 34(3), pages 383-399, August.
    5. Li, Xue & Zhou, Yusheng & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2022. "A systematic review on seafarer health: Conditions, antecedents and interventions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 11-25.
    6. Bai-Qiao Chen & Kun Liu & Tongqiang Yu & Ruoxuan Li, 2024. "Enhancing Reliability in Floating Offshore Wind Turbines through Digital Twin Technology: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Cross, Helen, 2015. "Why fish? Using entry-strategies to inform governance of the small-scale sector: A case-study in the Bijagós Archipelago (West Africa)," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 128-135.
    8. Conghua Xue & Lijun Tang, 2019. "Organisational support and safety management: A study of shipboard safety supervision," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 30(4), pages 549-565, December.
    9. Hristos Karahalios & Z.L. Yang & J. Wang, 2015. "A risk appraisal system regarding the implementation of maritime regulations by a ship operator," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 389-413, May.
    10. Gobi Krishnan Veluplay & Wan Muhamad Amir W Ahmad & Kasypi Mokhtar & Halim & Nor Azlida Aleng, 2015. "Statistical Approach of Canonical Correlation Analysis, Risk Estimate Analysis and Response Surface Methodology towards Factors Affecting the Efficiency of the Management of Vessels," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 6(1), pages 01-06, January.
    11. Ek, Åsa & Runefors, Marcus & Borell, Jonas, 2014. "Relationships between safety culture aspects – A work process to enable interpretation," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 179-186.
    12. Wang, Likun & Yang, Zaili, 2018. "Bayesian network modelling and analysis of accident severity in waterborne transportation: A case study in China," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 277-289.
    13. Carolyn AE Graham & David Walters, 2021. "Representation of seafarers’ occupational safety and health: Limits of the Maritime Labour Convention," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 32(2), pages 266-282, June.
    14. Helen Devereux & Emma Wadsworth, 2021. "Work scheduling and work location control in precarious and ‘permanent’ employment," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 32(2), pages 230-246, June.
    15. Yue Jiao & Maxim A. Dulebenets & Yui-yip Lau, 2020. "Cruise Ship Safety Management in Asian Regions: Trends and Future Outlook," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-15, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:36:y:2012:i:2:p:528-535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.