IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v88y2019ics0264837719304764.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opposition to housing development in a suburban US County: Characteristics, origins, and consequences

Author

Listed:
  • Whittemore, Andrew H.
  • BenDor, Todd K.

Abstract

Local opposition to new housing is a well-known phenomenon, but the degree to which it characterizes planning debates or influences outcomes, relative to more supportive stances, is less understood. This paper investigates public comments recorded at public hearings regarding housing-related rezoning cases in order to quantify the amount of comments that can be characterized as oppositional, as well as the sources and effects of this opposition. We conducted a survey of comments made over three decades by 994 individuals appearing at planning commission hearings concerning 330 rezoning cases in Henrico County, Virginia (USA). We find that the overwhelming majority (85.8%) of individuals expressed negative sentiments, that this negativity was consistent throughout the study period, and that this negativity was most often stated in terms of anxieties over traffic, flooding, road connections and access, proposed development density, and property values. Using logistic regression analysis, we find that larger rezonings, the incorporation of multi-family or zero lot-line housing, higher census tract populations, increases in homeownership, increasing population density, and increasing racial diversity are all significantly associated with higher levels of opposition. Opposition in the case study county contributes to the adoption of numerous zoning conditions related to traffic, drainage, and site design, but more commonly to restrictions on density and increased floor areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Whittemore, Andrew H. & BenDor, Todd K., 2019. "Opposition to housing development in a suburban US County: Characteristics, origins, and consequences," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:88:y:2019:i:c:s0264837719304764
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837719304764
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104158?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John F. McDonald & Daniel P. McMillen, 2004. "Determinants of Suburban Development Controls: A Fischel Expedition," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(2), pages 341-361, February.
    2. Jonathan T. Rothwell & Douglas S. Massey, 2010. "Density Zoning and Class Segregation in U.S. Metropolitan Areas," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 91(5), pages 1123-1143, December.
    3. Corianne Payton Scally & J. Rosie Tighe, 2015. "Democracy in Action?: NIMBY as Impediment to Equitable Affordable Housing Siting," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 749-769, July.
    4. William A. Fischel, 2004. "An Economic History of Zoning and a Cure for its Exclusionary Effects," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(2), pages 317-340, February.
    5. Jonathan T. Rothwell & Douglas S. Massey, 2010. "Density Zoning and Class Segregation in U.S. Metropolitan Areas," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 91(s1), pages 1123-1143.
    6. Richer, Jerrell, 1995. "Explaining the Vote for Slow Growth," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 82(3-4), pages 207-223, March.
    7. Victoria A. Beard & Carolina S. Sarmiento, 2014. "Planning, Public Participation, and Money Politics in Santa Ana (CA)," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 80(2), pages 168-181, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Doberstein, Carey, 2020. "Role-playing in public engagement for housing for vulnerable populations: An experiment exploring its possibilities and limitations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Zhao, Qinglei & Jiang, Guanghui & Yang, Yuting & Tian, Yingying & Fan, Lihui & Zhou, Tao & Tian, Yaya, 2022. "Multifunction change of rural housing land in metropolitan suburbs from the perspective of farmer households’ land-use behavior," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    3. Christian A. Nygaard & George Galster & Stephen Glackin, 2024. "The Size and Spatial Extent of Neighborhood Price Impacts of Infill Development: Scale Matters?," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 277-306, August.
    4. Gilbert, Catherine & Gurran, Nicole, 2021. "Can ceding planning controls for major projects support metropolitan housing supply and diversity? The case of Sydney, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kling, Hannah KM, 2020. "Land-Use Regulations As Exclusion: A GIS Analysis," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 50(1), February.
    2. Katherine King, 2013. "Jane Jacobs and ‘The Need for Aged Buildings’: Neighbourhood Historical Development Pace and Community Social Relations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(12), pages 2407-2424, September.
    3. Ann Owens, 2015. "Assisted Housing and Income Segregation among Neighborhoods in U.S. Metropolitan Areas," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 660(1), pages 98-116, July.
    4. Katharina Schone & Wilfried Koch & Catherine Baumont, 2013. "Modeling local growth control decisions in a multi-city case: Do spatial interactions and lobbying efforts matter?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 95-117, January.
    5. Keith R. Ihlanfeldt, 2004. "Exclusionary Land-use Regulations within Suburban Communities: A Review of the Evidence and Policy Prescriptions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(2), pages 261-283, February.
    6. Maeve E. Wallace & Carmen Green & Lisa Richardson & Katherine Theall & Joia Crear-Perry, 2017. "“Look at the Whole Me”: A Mixed-Methods Examination of Black Infant Mortality in the US through Women’s Lived Experiences and Community Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, July.
    7. Ahlfeldt, Gabriel M. & Pietrostefani, Elisabetta, 2019. "The economic effects of density: A synthesis," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 93-107.
    8. Peter Phibbs & Nicole Gurran, 2021. "The role and significance of planning in the determination of house prices in Australia: Recent policy debates," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(3), pages 457-479, May.
    9. Evans, Krista, 2019. "Exploring the relationship between visual preferences for tiny and small houses and land use policy in the southeastern United States," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 209-218.
    10. Jamie Bologna Pavlik & Yang Zhou, 2023. "Are historic districts a backdoor for segregation? Yes and no," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 41(3), pages 415-434, July.
    11. Songyang Lyu & Sungik Kang & Ja-Hoon Koo, 2022. "Social Capital Inequality According to Hukou in Unequal Economic Environments in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    12. Xi Yang, 2021. "Land-Use Regulations and Urban Growth of African Americans," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 35(4), pages 338-350, November.
    13. Gyourko, Joseph & Molloy, Raven, 2015. "Regulation and Housing Supply," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: Gilles Duranton & J. V. Henderson & William C. Strange (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 1289-1337, Elsevier.
    14. Delattre, Laurence & Chanel, Olivier & Livenais, Cecile & Napoléone, Claude, 2015. "Combining discourse analyses to enrich theory: The case of local land-use policies in South Eastern France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 60-75.
    15. Matthew Mleczko & Matthew Desmond, 2023. "Using natural language processing to construct a National Zoning and Land Use Database," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(13), pages 2564-2584, October.
    16. Swope, Carolyn B. & Hernández, Diana, 2019. "Housing as a determinant of health equity: A conceptual model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    17. Gilbert, Catherine & Gurran, Nicole, 2021. "Can ceding planning controls for major projects support metropolitan housing supply and diversity? The case of Sydney, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    18. Hilber, Christian A.L., 2010. "New housing supply and the dilution of social capital," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 419-437, May.
    19. Christian A. L. Hilber, 2017. "The Economic Implications of House Price Capitalization: A Synthesis," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 45(2), pages 301-339, April.
    20. Edward L. Glaeser & Joseph Gyourko & Raven E. Saks, 2005. "Why Have Housing Prices Gone Up?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(2), pages 329-333, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:88:y:2019:i:c:s0264837719304764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.