IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v88y2019ics0264837719300158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Addressing small-scale forestry informal markets through forest policy revision: A case study in Papua New Guinea

Author

Listed:
  • Scudder, Micah G.
  • Baynes, Jack
  • Applegate, Grahame
  • Herbohn, John

Abstract

Informal markets for timber harvested from small-scale and community forests can be vital to the development of rural economies and the empowerment of communities in many tropical developing countries. However, legal status of these markets is often uncertain, and this can prevent smallholders accessing government support and gaining access to financing. In Papua New Guinea (PNG), knowledge about the small-scale forestry informal market is limited, since the government does not have the resources to track or regulate it. Casual observation suggests that the market is comprised of individuals or businesses using portable sawmills for the commercial production of rough-sawn lumber. We used a descriptive case study approach to understand the processes of the forest-based informal market and to determine if there are specific forest policy/regulation features that are leading to informal market activities. We found that the forest policies/regulations are driving participation in the informal market because of vague policy definitions and the existing timber harvest permits being more suited to industrial-scale harvests and inappropriate to the needs of small-scale forestry participants. The current distribution of forest resource rents in the informal market is skewed in favour of small-scale timber product manufacturers, resulting in the forest resource owners receiving an inequitable share of the timber value. We estimated that the log harvests occurring in the informal market could be in the order of 560,000 cubic meters (m3) annually, which is equivalent to 17% of PNG’s log exports in 2017. The estimated size of this market highlights the large unmet economic potential occurring in the small-scale forestry sector. We recommend that the existing harvest regulations be revised to include a new small-scale harvest permit of 500 m3 per site per annum, along with improved timber royalty rates for the resource owners. In addition, we recommend increased government support be provided through extension foresters to improve the sustainability and productivity of the small-scale forest products market.

Suggested Citation

  • Scudder, Micah G. & Baynes, Jack & Applegate, Grahame & Herbohn, John, 2019. "Addressing small-scale forestry informal markets through forest policy revision: A case study in Papua New Guinea," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:88:y:2019:i:c:s0264837719300158
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837719300158
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scudder, Micah G. & Herbohn, John & Baynes, Jack, 2019. "Are portable sawmills a financially viable option for economic development in tropical forests?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 188-197.
    2. Vega, Dora Carias & Keenan, Rodney J., 2014. "Transaction cost theory of the firm and community forestry enterprises," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1-7.
    3. Friedrich Schneider & Andreas Buehn & Claudio E. Montenegro, 2011. "Shadow Economies All Over the World: New Estimates for 162 Countries from 1999 to 2007," Chapters, in: Friedrich Schneider (ed.), Handbook on the Shadow Economy, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Carias Vega, Dora & Keenan, Rodney J., 2016. "Transaction costs and the organization of CFEs: Experiences from ejidos in Quintana Roo, Mexico," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-8.
    5. Scudder, Micah G. & Herbohn, John L. & Baynes, Jack, 2018. "The failure of eco-forestry as a small-scale native forest management model in Papua New Guinea," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 696-704.
    6. Ojha, Hemant R. & Ford, Rebecca & Keenan, Rodney J. & Race, Digby & Carias Vega, Dora & Baral, Himlal & Sapkota, Prativa, 2016. "Delocalizing Communities: Changing Forms of Community Engagement in Natural Resources Governance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 274-290.
    7. Scudder, Micah G. & Baynes, Jack & Herbohn, John, 2019. "Timber royalty reform to improve the livelihoods of forest resource owners in Papua New Guinea," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 113-119.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Scudder, Micah & Wampe, Nathan & Waviki, Zephaniah & Applegate, Grahame & Herbohn, John, 2022. "Smallholder cocoa agroforestry systems; is increased yield worth the labour and capital inputs?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    2. Frey, Gregory E. & Charnley, Susan & Makala, Jasper, 2021. "Economic viability of community-based forest management for certified timber production in southeastern Tanzania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    3. Carias, Dora & Page, Tony & Smith, Hilary & Race, Digby & Keenan, Rodney J. & Palmer, Graeme & Baynes, Jack, 2022. "Beyond the ‘Field of Dreams’ model in smallholder forestry: Building viable timber value chains for smallholder tree growers in developing countries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Torres-Rojo, Juan Manuel & Moreno-Sánchez, Rafael & Amador-Callejas, Joel, 2019. "Effect of capacity building in alleviating poverty and improving forest conservation in the communal forests of Mexico," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 108-122.
    2. Trejos, Bernardo & Flores, Juan Carlos, 2021. "Influence of property rights on performance of community-based forest devolution policies in Honduras," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    3. Frey, Gregory E. & Charnley, Susan & Makala, Jasper, 2021. "Economic viability of community-based forest management for certified timber production in southeastern Tanzania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    4. Petra Koudelkova & Wadim Strielkowski & Denisa Hejlova, 2015. "Corruption and System Change in the Czech Republic: Firm-level Evidence," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 1, pages 25-46, March.
    5. Bucciol, Alessandro & Cavalli, Laura & Fedotenkov, Igor & Pertile, Paolo & Polin, Veronica & Sartor, Nicola & Sommacal, Alessandro, 2017. "A large scale OLG model for the analysis of the redistributive effects of policy reforms," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 104-127.
    6. Piotr Dybka & Bartosz Olesiński & Marek Rozkrut & Andrzej Torój, 2023. "Measuring the model uncertainty of shadow economy estimates," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 30(4), pages 1069-1106, August.
    7. Rahman, Aminur, 2014. "Investment climate reforms and job creation in developing countries : what do we know and what should we do ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7025, The World Bank.
    8. Sjöstedt, Martin & Sundström, Aksel & Jagers, Sverker C. & Ntuli, Herbert, 2022. "Governance through community policing: What makes citizens report poaching of wildlife to state officials?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    9. Matthieu BOUSSICHAS & Vincent NOSSEK, 2014. "État des lieux statistique des Objectifs du Développement Durable (ODD) dans les PMA et les autres pays vulnérables," Working Papers P114, FERDI.
    10. Eun Young Oh & Shuonan Zhang, 2022. "Informal economy and central bank digital currency," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 60(4), pages 1520-1539, October.
    11. Martin Halla, 2011. "The Link between the Intrinsic Motivation to Comply and Compliance Behaviour: A Critical Appraisal of Existing Evidence," Chapters, in: Friedrich Schneider (ed.), Handbook on the Shadow Economy, chapter 11, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Ahmed Gulzar & Novaira Junaid & Adnan Haider, 2010. "What is Hidden in the Hidden Economy of Pakistan? Size, Causes, Issues, and Implications," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 49(4), pages 665-704.
    13. Adnan Haider & Musleh ud Din & Ejaz Ghani, 2012. "Monetary Policy, Informality and Business Cycle Fluctuations in a Developing Economy Vulnerable to External Shocks," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 51(4), pages 609-681.
    14. El-Mallakh, Nelly & Maurel, Mathilde & Speciale, Biagio, 2018. "Arab spring protests and women's labor market outcomes: Evidence from the Egyptian revolution," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 656-682.
    15. Karine Torosyan & Randall K. Filer, 2014. "Tax reform in Georgia and the size of the shadow economy," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 22(1), pages 179-210, January.
    16. Ceyhun Elgin & Friedrich Schneider, 2016. "Shadow Economies in OECD Countries: DGE vs. MIMIC Approaches," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 30(1), pages 51-75.
    17. Massomeh Hajilee & Farhang Niroomand, 2018. "The impact of interest rate volatility on financial market inclusion: evidence from emerging markets," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 42(2), pages 352-368, April.
    18. Ravi KANBUR & Lucas RONCONI, 2018. "Enforcement matters: The effective regulation of labour," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 157(3), pages 331-356, September.
    19. Brindusa Mihaela TUDOSE & Raluca Irina CLIPA, 2016. "An Analysis Of The Shadow Economy In Eu Countries," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 8(2), pages 303-312, August.
    20. Jozef Pacolet & Joris Vanormelingen, 2015. "Illicit Financial Flows: concepts and first macro estimates for Belgium and its 18 preferred partner countries," BeFinD Working Papers 0110, University of Namur, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:88:y:2019:i:c:s0264837719300158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.