IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v85y2019icp121-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What are the main problems in the management of rural cooperatives in Southern Brazil?

Author

Listed:
  • Brandão, Janaína Balk
  • Breitenbach, Raquel

Abstract

This research aims to identify the main problems encountered in the management of agricultural cooperatives in Rio Grande do Sul and factors that may interfere in their success. It has three specific objectives. First, it seeks to identify how members participate in these agricultural cooperatives’ decisions. Second, with the goal of helping cooperatives to develop solutions, it verifies the types of difficulties encountered in the current configuration of markets that cooperatives are placed in. Third, it identifies actions to minimize the managerial problems of agricultural cooperatives. This work is based on a multicase study on 10 agricultural cooperatives in the state, whose managers were interviewed in a semi-structured way in 2016. The results showed that the main problems encountered in the management of these organizations are as follows. a) Cooperatives compete with other companies in the sector, and they must be competitive while being faithful to the cooperative principles. b) The team responsible for the cooperatives’ management finds it difficult to compete in oligopolized markets. c) Cooperative members’ participation in management is low. d) Cooperatives’ associates and members exhibit opportunistic behaviors. Three categories of current problems were verified in the management of agricultural cooperatives: 1) political and institutional, 2) behavioral, and 3) technical-administrative.

Suggested Citation

  • Brandão, Janaína Balk & Breitenbach, Raquel, 2019. "What are the main problems in the management of rural cooperatives in Southern Brazil?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 121-129.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:85:y:2019:i:c:p:121-129
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837718308810
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Figueiredo, Vítor & Franco, Mário, 2018. "Wine cooperatives as a form of social entrepreneurship: Empirical evidence about their impact on society," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 812-821.
    2. Zuhui Huang & Qiao Liang, 2018. "Agricultural organizations and the role of farmer cooperatives in China since 1978: past and future," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(1), pages 48-64, February.
    3. Metin Cakir & Joseph V. Balagtas, 2012. "Estimating Market Power of U.S. Dairy Cooperatives in the Fluid Milk Market," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 94(3), pages 647-658.
    4. Ortmann, Gerald F. & King, Robert P., 2007. "Agricultural Cooperatives I: History, Theory and Problems," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 46(1), pages 1-29, March.
    5. Rosangela Violetti Bertolin & Antônio Carlos dos Santos & Juvêncio Braga de Lima & Marcelo José Braga, 2008. "Information asymmetry and trust in cooperative interactions," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 12(1), pages 59-81.
    6. Chagwiza, Clarietta & Muradian, Roldan & Ruben, Ruerd, 2016. "Cooperative membership and dairy performance among smallholders in Ethiopia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 165-173.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Taniellen Miranda Coelho & Julianna Zambon Moscon & Irineu de Brito Junior & Angélica Alebrant Mendes & Hugo Tsugunobu Yoshida Yoshizaki, 2022. "Public School Food Supply Chain during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of the City of Vitória (Brazil)," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Breitenbach, Raquel & Brandão, Janaína Balk, 2021. "Factors that contribute to satisfaction in cooperator-cooperative relationships," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    3. Jiri Hejkrlik & Petra Chaloupkova & Tetyana Sokolska, 2023. "The role of transformational leadership and leaders’ skills for new agricultural cooperatives in post‐soviet countries," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(1), pages 109-129, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiang, Meishan & Li, Jingrong & Mi, Yunsheng, 2024. "Farmers’ cooperatives and smallholder farmers’ access to credit: Evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Manda, Julius & Khonje, Makaiko G. & Alene, Arega D. & Tufa, Adane H & Abdoulaye, Tahirou & Mutenje, Munyaradzi & Setimela, Peter & Manyong, Victor, 2020. "Does cooperative membership increase and accelerate agricultural technology adoption? Empirical evidence from Zambia," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    3. Hongyun Zheng & Puneet Vatsa & Wanglin Ma & Dil Bahadur Rahut, 2023. "Does agricultural cooperative membership influence off‐farm work decisions of farm couples?," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(3), pages 831-855, September.
    4. Rui Chen & Nawab Khan & Shemei Zhang, 2022. "Policy Evaluation of Demonstration Cooperative Construction: Evidence from Sichuan Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Agbo, Maxime & Rousselière, Damien & Salanié, Julien, 2015. "Agricultural marketing cooperatives with direct selling: A cooperative–non-cooperative game," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 56-71.
    6. Lei Wu & Chuanjian Li & Yang Gao, 2022. "Regional agricultural cooperatives and subjective wellbeing of rural households in China," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(S2), pages 138-158, November.
    7. Bagchi, Niladri Sekhar & Mishra, Pulak & Behera, Bhagirath, 2021. "Value chain development for linking land-constrained farmers to markets: Experience from two selected villages of West Bengal, India," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    8. Maxime Agbo & Damien Rousselière & Julien Salanié, 2013. "A Theory of Agricultural Marketing Cooperatives with Direct selling," Working Papers halshs-00906894, HAL.
    9. repec:hal:journl:halshs-01098762 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Breitenbach, Raquel & Brandão, Janaína Balk, 2021. "Factors that contribute to satisfaction in cooperator-cooperative relationships," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    11. Donald M. Houessou & Ben G. J. S. Sonneveld & Augustin K. N. Aoudji & Frejus S. Thoto & Smith A. R. Dossou & Denyse J. R. M. Snelder & Anselme A. Adegbidi & Tjard De Cock Buning, 2019. "How to Transition from Cooperations to Cooperatives: A Case Study of the Factors Impacting the Organization of Urban Gardeners in Benin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-25, August.
    12. Abraham, Mathew & Verteramo Chiu, Leslie & Joshi, Ekta & Ali Ilahi, Muhammad & Pingali, Prabhu, 2022. "Aggregation models and small farm commercialization – A scoping review of the global literature," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    13. Çakır, Metin & Nolan, James, 2015. "Revisiting Concentration in Food and Agricultural Supply Chains: The Welfare Implications of Market Power in a Complementary Input Sector," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 40(2), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Kifle T. Sebhatu & Fatemeh Taheri & Tekeste Berhanu & Miet Maertens & Steven Van Passel & Marijke D'Haese, 2021. "Beyond focus: Exploring variability of service provision of agricultural cooperatives," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(2), pages 207-231, June.
    15. Kumse, Kaittisak & Suzuki, Nobuhiro & Sato, Takeshi & Demont, Matty, 2021. "The spillover effect of direct competition between marketing cooperatives and private intermediaries: Evidence from the Thai rice value chain," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    16. Isaac Zúñiga Aguilar, 2022. "Neuroeconomics in Cooperatives: Hierarchy of Emotional Patterns in the Collective Decision-Making Process for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-31, June.
    17. Poizat, Axelle & Duvaleix-Treguer, Sabine & Bonnet-Beaugrand, Florence, 2018. "Vertical integration and health control measures in the French young bull sector," Working Papers 273145, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    18. Bjorn Van Campenhout & Bart Minten & Johan F. M. Swinnen, 2021. "Leading the way – foreign direct investment and dairy value chain upgrading in Uganda," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(4), pages 607-631, July.
    19. Jasper GRASHUIS & Ye SU, 2019. "A Review Of The Empirical Literature On Farmer Cooperatives: Performance, Ownership And Governance, Finance, And Member Attitude," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(1), pages 77-102, March.
    20. Liang, Q.X. & Hendrikse, G.W.J., 2012. "Cooperative CEO Identity and Efficient Governance: Member or Outside CEO?," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2012-019-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    21. Yuying Liu & Ruiling Shi & Yiting Peng & Wei Wang & Xinhong Fu, 2022. "Impacts of Technology Training Provided by Agricultural Cooperatives on Farmers’ Adoption of Biopesticides in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:85:y:2019:i:c:p:121-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.