IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v75y2018icp191-200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bamboo based family forests offer opportunities for biomass production and carbon farming in North East India

Author

Listed:
  • Nath, Arun Jyoti
  • Sileshi, Gudeta W.
  • Das, Ashesh Kumar

Abstract

Although neglected in scientific research and development, bamboo based family forests (BBFF) have traditionally been managed on family farms because of their great socioeconomic value in India and other parts of Asia. Recently, there has been increasing interest in their role in biomass production and climate change mitigation. However, our knowledge of the contribution of BBFF at village and landscape level to biomass production and terrestrial carbon is very limited. Therefore, the objectives of this paper are to (1) quantify occurrence of bamboo resources in BBFF,(2) develop appropriate models for estimation of biomass of thick walled bamboos, and (3) estimate biomass and carbon stock in BBFFs in North East India. Occurrence of bamboo resources in BBFF was quantified through survey of 2850 households selected from 95 villages of Barak valley, North East India. Allometric models for biomass estimation were developed through destructive harvesting of 268 bamboo culms from Bambusa cacharensis, B. vulgaris and B. balcooa. The height-diameter relationships and allometric scaling between above-ground biomass (AGB), culm height (H) and diameter at breast height (D) were examined using various models.Culm height, D and AGB were allometrically related in all the three species, but the exponents were significantly larger than those expected under a geometric and stress similarity growth models. The above-ground biomass carbon density in BBFF was estimated at 16.38 Mg ha−1 for B. cacharensis, 38.42 Mg ha−1 for B. vulgaris and 19.64 Mg ha−1 for B. balcooa. In addition to the various ecosystem services provided by village grown bamboo, total biomass (52.8 Mg ha−1) and carbon (25.8 Mg ha−1) storage in BBFFs can offer an opportunity for carbon farming.

Suggested Citation

  • Nath, Arun Jyoti & Sileshi, Gudeta W. & Das, Ashesh Kumar, 2018. "Bamboo based family forests offer opportunities for biomass production and carbon farming in North East India," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 191-200.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:75:y:2018:i:c:p:191-200
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483771731699X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maxim Lobovikov & Dieter Schoene & Lou Yping, 2012. "Bamboo in climate change and rural livelihoods," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 261-276, March.
    2. Brian J. Enquist & Geoffrey B. West & Eric L. Charnov & James H. Brown, 1999. "Allometric Scaling of Production and Life History Variation in Vascular Plants," Working Papers 99-10-072, Santa Fe Institute.
    3. Brian J. Enquist & Geoffrey B. West & Eric L. Charnov & James H. Brown, 1999. "Allometric scaling of production and life-history variation in vascular plants," Nature, Nature, vol. 401(6756), pages 907-911, October.
    4. Rico Kongsager & Jonas Napier & Ole Mertz, 2013. "The carbon sequestration potential of tree crop plantations," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 18(8), pages 1197-1213, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dipita Ghosh & Subodh Kumar Maiti, 2021. "Eco-Restoration of Coal Mine Spoil: Biochar Application and Carbon Sequestration for Achieving UN Sustainable Development Goals 13 and 15," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Harshita Negi & Deep Chandra Suyal & Ravindra Soni & Krishna Giri & Reeta Goel, 2023. "Indian Scenario of Biomass Availability and Its Bioenergy-Conversion Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Desy Ekawati & Lina Karlinasari & Rinekso Soekmadi & Machfud, 2023. "A Model of Integrated Community-Based Bamboo Management for the Bamboo Industry in Ngada Regency, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hannah Capes & Robert J. Maillardet & Thomas G. Baker & Christopher J. Weston & Don McGuire & Ian C. Dumbrell & Andrew P. Robinson, 2017. "The Allometric Quarter-Power Scaling Model and Its Applicability to Grand Fir and Eucalyptus Trees," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(4), pages 562-584, December.
    2. Nadia S Santini & Quan Hua & Nele Schmitz & Catherine E Lovelock, 2013. "Radiocarbon Dating and Wood Density Chronologies of Mangrove Trees in Arid Western Australia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-8, November.
    3. Tao, Yong & Lin, Li & Wang, Hanjie & Hou, Chen, 2023. "Superlinear growth and the fossil fuel energy sustainability dilemma: Evidence from six continents," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 39-51.
    4. Tyson L Swetnam & Christopher D O’Connor & Ann M Lynch, 2016. "Tree Morphologic Plasticity Explains Deviation from Metabolic Scaling Theory in Semi-Arid Conifer Forests, Southwestern USA," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Masae Iwamoto Ishihara & Yasuo Konno & Kiyoshi Umeki & Yasuyuki Ohno & Kihachiro Kikuzawa, 2016. "A New Model for Size-Dependent Tree Growth in Forests," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Janko Arsić & Marko Stojanović & Lucia Petrovičová & Estelle Noyer & Slobodan Milanović & Jan Světlík & Petr Horáček & Jan Krejza, 2021. "Increased wood biomass growth is associated with lower wood density in Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. saplings growing under elevated CO2," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Ximena Rueda & Andrea Paz & Theodora Gibbs‐Plessl & Ronald Leon & Byron Moyano & Eric F Lambin, 2018. "Smallholders at a Crossroad: Intensify or Fall behind? Exploring Alternative Livelihood Strategies in a Globalized World," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 215-229, February.
    8. Austine Ofondu Chinomso Iroegbu & Suprakas Sinha Ray, 2021. "Bamboos: From Bioresource to Sustainable Materials and Chemicals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, November.
    9. Rico Kongsager, 2018. "Linking Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation: A Review with Evidence from the Land-Use Sectors," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Silvina M. Manrique & Judith Franco, 2020. "Tree cover increase mitigation strategy: implications of the “replacement approach” in carbon storage of a subtropical ecosystem," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 1481-1508, December.
    11. Echaroj, Snunkhaem & Santikunaporn, Malee & Phan, Anh N., 2023. "Supercritical ethanol liquefaction of bamboo leaves using functionalized reduced graphene oxides for high quality bio-oil production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 848-857.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:75:y:2018:i:c:p:191-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.