IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v123y2022ics026483772200429x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Obstacles to urban redevelopment in squatter settlements: The role of the informal housing market

Author

Listed:
  • Ogas-Mendez, Alberto Federico
  • Isoda, Yuzuru

Abstract

Formation of an informal housing market in a squatter settlement stratifies the inhabitants into social classes within the settlement. By focusing on different interests among de facto housing tenure, this study demonstrates that the informal housing market is an obstacle to the redevelopment of squatter settlements. Our research is based on an extensive quantitative and qualitative survey of two squatter settlements in Buenos Aires and seeks to better understand inhabitants' preferences for spatial planning policies. This study highlights that urban redevelopment of squatter settlements would contradict the existing informal housing market. The importance of this research lies in understanding the numerous conflicts of interests surrounding housing tenure in the informal housing market, which needs to be resolved prior to carrying out urban redevelopment in squatter settlements.

Suggested Citation

  • Ogas-Mendez, Alberto Federico & Isoda, Yuzuru, 2022. "Obstacles to urban redevelopment in squatter settlements: The role of the informal housing market," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:123:y:2022:i:c:s026483772200429x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483772200429X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106402?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ., 2019. "Theory of non-territorial internal exit," Chapters, in: The Political Economy of Non-Territorial Exit, chapter 5, pages 143-180, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Jenny Preece, 2020. "Belonging in working-class neighbourhoods: dis-identification, territorialisation and biographies of people and place," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(4), pages 827-843, March.
    3. ., 2019. "Economic theory of non-territorial unbundling," Chapters, in: The Political Economy of Non-Territorial Exit, chapter 1, pages 14-38, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Ho, Peter, 2018. "Institutional function versus form: The evolutionary credibility of land, housing and natural resources," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 642-650.
    5. ., 2017. "Infrastructure and Territoriality," Chapters, in: Global Infrastructure Networks, chapter 1, pages 1-30, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Paul Watt, 2006. "Respectability, Roughness and ‘Race’: Neighbourhood Place Images and the Making of Working‐Class Social Distinctions in London," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 776-797, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cattaneo, Andrea & Adukia, Anjali & Brown, David L. & Christiaensen, Luc & Evans, David K. & Haakenstad, Annie & McMenomy, Theresa & Partridge, Mark & Vaz, Sara & Weiss, Daniel J., 2022. "Economic and social development along the urban–rural continuum: New opportunities to inform policy," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    2. Elias Le Grand, 2015. "Linking Moralisation and Class Identity: The Role of Ressentiment and Respectability in the Social Reaction to ‘Chavs’," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 20(4), pages 18-32, November.
    3. Jiazhen Zhang & Jeremy Cenci & Vincent Becue & Sesil Koutra & Christos S. Ioakimidis, 2020. "Recent Evolution of Research on Industrial Heritage in Western Europe and China Based on Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Ayo Mansaray, 2018. "Complicity and contestation in the gentrifying urban primary school," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(14), pages 3076-3091, November.
    5. Kirtchik, Olessia & Boldyrev, Ivan, 2024. "“Rise And Fall” Of The Walrasian Program In Economics: A Social And Intellectual Dynamics Of The General Equilibrium Theory," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(1), pages 1-26, March.
    6. Martina Byrne & Brid Ni Chonaill, 2014. "‘Ghettos of the Mind’: Realities and Myths in the Construction of the Social Identity of a Dublin Suburb," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 19(3), pages 15-29, September.
    7. Anna Misztal & Magdalena Kowalska & Anita Fajczak-Kowalska & Otakar Strunecky, 2021. "Energy Efficiency and Decarbonization in the Context of Macroeconomic Stabilization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Loïc Wacquant, 2008. "Relocating Gentrification: The Working Class, Science and the State in Recent Urban Research," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 198-205, March.
    9. Fan, Shengyue & He, Miao & Zhang, Tianyu & Huo, Yajing & Fan, Di, 2022. "Credibility measurement as a tool for conserving nature: Chinese herders’ livelihood capitals and payment for grassland ecosystem services," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    10. Cozzolino, Stefano & Moroni, Stefano, 2021. "Multiple agents and self-organisation in complex cities: The crucial role of several property," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    11. You, Heyuan & Zhang, Jinrong & Song, Yan, 2022. "Assessing conflict of farmland institutions using credibility theory: Implications for socially acceptable land use," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    12. Señoret, Andrés & Ramirez, Maria Inés & Rehner, Johannes, 2022. "Employment and sustainability: The relation between precarious work and spatial inequality in the neoliberal city," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    13. Karen Lumsden, 2009. "‘Do We Look like Boy Racers?’ The Role of the Folk Devil in Contemporary Moral Panics," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    14. Mark Shepard & Katherine Baicker & Jonathan Skinner, 2020. "Does One Medicare Fit All? The Economics of Uniform Health Insurance Benefits," Tax Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 34(1), pages 1-41.
    15. Chen, Huirong, 2022. "Linking institutional function with form: Distributional dynamics, disequilibrium, and rural land shareholding in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    16. Silver, Daniel & Silva, Thiago H, 2021. "Complex Causal Structures of Neighbourhood Change: Evidence From a Functionalist Model and Yelp Data," SocArXiv wprf8_v1, Center for Open Science.
    17. Krul, Kees & Ho, Peter & Yang, Xiuyun, 2020. "Incentivizing household forest management in China's forest reform: Limitations to rights-based approaches in Southwest China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    18. Gareth Millington, 2012. "‘Man Dem Link Up’: London's Anti-Riots and Urban Modernism," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 17(4), pages 33-44, November.
    19. Gwen van Eijk, 2012. "Good Neighbours in Bad Neighbourhoods: Narratives of Dissociation and Practices of Neighbouring in a ‘Problem’ Place," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(14), pages 3009-3026, November.
    20. Lai, Lawrence W.C., 2024. "The Credibility Thesis meeting the Coase Theorem in terms of form and function," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:123:y:2022:i:c:s026483772200429x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.