IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v119y2022ics0264837722002277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A BIM-based framework for property dispute minimization – A case study for Victoria, Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Shin, Jihye
  • Rajabifard, Abbas
  • Kalantari, Mohsen
  • Atazadeh, Behnam

Abstract

Property disputes in multi-owned buildings (MOB) should be effectively managed to ensure harmonious land use in urban areas. Many studies indicate that a well-planned governance structure of MOBs relying on ownership systems could mitigate property disputes by eliminating their causes contrary to owner needs. However, issues in MOB use and management, stemming from the ownership systems and its relevant architectural systems, are hardly addressed in 2D-based building subdivision practices and frequently result in property disputes. To proactively address these issues, this paper proposes an approach based on Building Information Modeling (BIM) to minimize disputes in MOBs at planning stages in the context of Victoria, Australia. The paper argues that BIM is a suitable data environment to represent and detect dispute triggers interpreted in the spatial context. We first modeled a MOB governance structure as a sociotechnical system (STS) to provide a consistent view for characterizing dispute triggers. We then developed a BIM-based framework for identifying dispute triggers in the MOB governance STS. We implemented the framework and tested its feasibility using a real-world complex building. The results confirmed that the proposedframework would help developers, surveyors, and architects recognize dispute triggers and make better decisions to minimize disputes in planning MOBs.

Suggested Citation

  • Shin, Jihye & Rajabifard, Abbas & Kalantari, Mohsen & Atazadeh, Behnam, 2022. "A BIM-based framework for property dispute minimization – A case study for Victoria, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:119:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722002277
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837722002277
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicole Johnston & Eric Too, 2015. "Multi-owned properties in Australia: a governance typology of issues and outcomes," International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(4), pages 451-470, October.
    2. Larsson, Karolina & Paasch, Jesper M. & Paulsson, Jenny, 2020. "Representation of 3D cadastral boundaries - From analogue to digital," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    3. Laurie Buys & Evonne Miller, 2012. "Residential satisfaction in inner urban higher-density Brisbane, Australia: role of dwelling design, neighbourhood and neighbours," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(3), pages 319-338, May.
    4. Çağdaş, Volkan & Paasch, Jesper M. & Paulsson, Jenny & Ploeger, Hendrik & Kara, Abdullah, 2020. "Co-ownership shares in condominium – A comparative analysis for selected civil law jurisdictions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    5. Dianne Dredge & Eddo Coiacetto, 2011. "Strata Title: Towards a Research Agenda for Informed Planning Practice," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 417-433.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jesper M. Paasch & Jenny Paulsson, 2021. "3D Property Research from a Legal Perspective Revisited," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Carolyn‐Dung Thi Thanh Tran & Brian Dollery, 2021. "All in the Mind: Citizen Satisfaction and Financial Performance in the Victorian Local Government System," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(1), pages 51-64, March.
    3. Lvhua Wang & Xinxin Zhou & Jian Shen & Shuting Zhou, 2024. "Geovisualization: an optimization algorithm of viewpoint generation for 3D cadastral property units," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 91-116, January.
    4. Theresa Kotulla & Jon Martin Denstadli & Are Oust & Elisabeth Beusker, 2019. "What Does It Take to Make the Compact City Liveable for Wider Groups? Identifying Key Neighbourhood and Dwelling Features," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Hazel Easthope & Sarah Hudson & Bill Randolph, 2013. "Urban Renewal and Strata Scheme Termination: Balancing Communal Management and Individual Property Rights," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(6), pages 1421-1435, June.
    6. Katarzyna Kocur-Bera & Hubert Frąszczak, 2021. "Coherence of Cadastral Data in Land Management—A Case Study of Rural Areas in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Hong Leng & Bingbing Han, 2022. "Effect of Environmental Planning on Elderly Individual Quality of Life in Severe Cold Regions: A Case Study in Northeastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Yuting Wu & Hongyan Wen & Meichen Fu, 2024. "A Review of Research on the Value Evaluation of Urban Underground Space," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-28, April.
    9. Meyer, Peter B. & Schwarze, Reimund, 2019. "Financing climate-resilient infrastructure: A political-economy framework," UFZ Discussion Papers 1/2019, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    10. Lynda Cheshire & Robin Fitzgerald & Yan Liu, 2019. "Neighbourhood change and neighbour complaints: How gentrification and densification influence the prevalence of problems between neighbours," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(6), pages 1093-1112, May.
    11. Karen Villanueva & Hannah Badland & Robert Tanton & Ilan Katz & Sally Brinkman & Ju-Lin Lee & Geoffrey Woolcock & Billie Giles-Corti & Sharon Goldfeld, 2019. "Local Housing Characteristics Associated with Early Childhood Development Outcomes in Australian Disadvantaged Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-17, May.
    12. Eziyi Ibem & Dolapo Amole, 2013. "Residential Satisfaction in Public Core Housing in Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 113(1), pages 563-581, August.
    13. Madsen, Morten Dalum & Paasch, Jesper Mayntz, 2023. "3D real property in vertical mixed-use developments. A comparative analysis of common property and management aspects in selected jurisdictions – The case of British Columbia, Denmark and Sweden," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    14. Kai Zhang & Dong Yan, 2023. "Exploring Indoor and Outdoor Residential Factors of High-Density Communities for Promoting the Housing Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Cozzolino, Stefano & Moroni, Stefano, 2021. "Multiple agents and self-organisation in complex cities: The crucial role of several property," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    16. Rasheed Osuolale Oladosu & Mohammed Abdulkadir & Mohammed Abdulkadir, 2023. "Contextual Reports on Residential Satisfaction Studies from Developing Countries: Review Highlights," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(5), pages 1765-1777, May.
    17. María Salomé Ochoa Rico & Arnaldo Vergara-Romero & José Fernando Romero Subia & Juan Antonio Jimber del Río, 2022. "Study of citizen satisfaction and loyalty in the urban area of Guayaquil: Perspective of the quality of public services applying structural equations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-27, February.
    18. Sandrine Gaymard & Jimmy Bordarie, 2015. "The Perception of the Ideal Neighborhood: A Preamble to Implementation of a “Street Use Code”," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 120(3), pages 801-816, February.
    19. Fatih Döner & Samet Şirin, 2020. "3D Digital Representation of Cadastral Data in Turkey—Apartments Case," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
    20. Emmanuel Bosompem Boadi & Shaojun Chen & Ebenezer Impriam Amponsah & Ruth Appiah, 2022. "Antecedents of Residential Satisfaction in Resettlement Housing in Ellembelle: A PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-13, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:119:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722002277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.