IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v113y2022ics0264837721005998.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International acceptance of automated modern tools use must-have for sustainable real estate market development

Author

Listed:
  • Renigier-Biłozor, Małgorzata
  • Źróbek, Sabina
  • Walacik, Marek
  • Borst, Richard
  • Grover, Richard
  • d’Amato, Maurizio

Abstract

The main aim of the paper is to systematise the terms and methodologies used in the property valuation and market analyses domain (single property or mass valuation). The need for this is justified by different semantic and procedural approaches and legal regulations in countries around the world. The research was carried out using the method of critical analysis of current state-of-art literature of the subject, valuation standards, and opinions of practitioners and experts of real estate markets available on social media. Answers of international respondents were gathered as well by using questionnaires. The paper fulfils the gap in perception and comprehension of specific terms and modern tools by entities connected with real estate domain. The clash of two extreme realities is being dealt with: on the one hand, traditional solutions based on universally accepted methods and techniques as well as faith in the infallibility and objectivity of a human analysing the real estate market dominate; on the other, modern technologies that are boldly entering. The main conclusion of the study is that entities should change perception of different automated solutions (e. g. AVM, CAMA, AAVM) as being operating in contradiction to ingrained methods and use them as an additional tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Renigier-Biłozor, Małgorzata & Źróbek, Sabina & Walacik, Marek & Borst, Richard & Grover, Richard & d’Amato, Maurizio, 2022. "International acceptance of automated modern tools use must-have for sustainable real estate market development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:113:y:2022:i:c:s0264837721005998
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837721005998
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105876?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Helbich & Wolfgang Brunauer & Eric Vaz & Peter Nijkamp, 2014. "Spatial Heterogeneity in Hedonic House Price Models: The Case of Austria," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(2), pages 390-411, February.
    2. Nghiep Nguyen & Al Cripps, 2001. "Predicting Housing Value: A Comparison of Multiple Regression Analysis and Artificial Neural Networks," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 22(3), pages 313-336.
    3. Andrzej Biłozor & Szymon Czyża & Tomasz Bajerowski, 2019. "Identification and Location of a Transitional Zone between an Urban and a Rural Area Using Fuzzy Set Theory, CLC, and HRL Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    4. George H. Lentz & Ko Wang, 1998. "Residential Appraisal and the Lending Process: A Survey of Issues," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 15(1), pages 11-40.
    5. Daikun Wang & Victor Jing Li, 2019. "Mass Appraisal Models of Real Estate in the 21st Century: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Renigier-Biłozor, Malgorzata & Janowski, Artur & d’Amato, Maurizio, 2019. "Automated Valuation Model based on fuzzy and rough set theory for real estate market with insufficient source data," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    7. M. Fletcher & P. Gallimore & J. Mangan, 2000. "Heteroscedasticity in hedonic house price models," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 93-108, January.
    8. Brzezicka, Justyna & Łaszek, Jacek & Olszewski, Krzysztof & Waszczuk, Joanna, 2019. "Analysis of the filtering process and the ripple effect on the primary and secondary housing market in Warsaw, Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. Zhangcheng Chen & Yueming Hu & Chen Jason Zhang & Yilun Liu, 2017. "An Optimal Rubrics-Based Approach to Real Estate Appraisal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-19, May.
    10. W.J. McCluskey & M. McCord & P.T. Davis & M. Haran & D. McIlhatton, 2013. "Prediction accuracy in mass appraisal: a comparison of modern approaches," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 239-265, December.
    11. Cassel, Eric & Mendelsohn, Robert, 1985. "The choice of functional forms for hedonic price equations: Comment," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 135-142, September.
    12. Dominique Fischer, 2003. "Multi-criteria analysis of ranking preferences on residential traits," ERES eres2003_154, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    13. Douw Gert Brand Boshoff, 2013. "Investigating Property Purchase Power Parity to Explain Economic Behavior," ERES eres2013_341, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Renigier-Biłozor, Małgorzata & Janowski, Artur & Walacik, Marek & Chmielewska, Aneta, 2022. "Modern challenges of property market analysis- homogeneous areas determination," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Francesco Tajani & Felicia Di Liddo & Rossana Ranieri, 2022. "The Effective Use of National Recovery and Resilience Plan Funding: A Methodological Approach for the Optimal Assessment of the Initiative Costs," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Sisman, S. & Aydinoglu, A.C., 2022. "Improving performance of mass real estate valuation through application of the dataset optimization and Spatially Constrained Multivariate Clustering Analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Ma. Janice J. Gumasing & Renée Hannah A. Niro, 2023. "Antecedents of Real Estate Investment Intention among Filipino Millennials and Gen Z: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-35, September.
    5. Rubina Canesi & Beatrice Gallo, 2023. "Risk Assessment in Sustainable Infrastructure Development Projects: A Tool for Mitigating Cost Overruns," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Małgorzata Renigier-Biłozor & Sabina Źróbek & Marek Walacik, 2022. "Modern Technologies in the Real Estate Market—Opponents vs. Proponents of Their Use: Does New Category of Value Solve the Problem?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Abdul Rahman, Mohd Shahril & Awang, Mariah & Jagun, Zainab Toyin, 2024. "Polycrisis: Factors, impacts, and responses in the housing market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    8. Cheng-Hong Yang & Borcy Lee & Yu-Da Lin, 2022. "Effect of Money Supply, Population, and Rent on Real Estate: A Clustering Analysis in Taiwan," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Andrzej Biłozor & Iwona Cieślak & Szymon Czyża & Karol Szuniewicz & Tomasz Bajerowski, 2024. "Land-Use Change Dynamics in Areas Subjected to Direct Urbanization Pressure: A Case Study of the City of Olsztyn," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maurizio d’Amato, 2007. "Comparing Rough Set Theory with Multiple Regression Analysis as Automated Valuation Methodologies," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 42-65.
    2. Renigier-Biłozor, Malgorzata & Janowski, Artur & d’Amato, Maurizio, 2019. "Automated Valuation Model based on fuzzy and rough set theory for real estate market with insufficient source data," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    3. Jose Torres-Pruñonosa & Pablo García-Estévez & Josep Maria Raya & Camilo Prado-Román, 2022. "How on Earth Did Spanish Banking Sell the Housing Stock?," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    4. Daikun Wang & Victor Jing Li & Huayi Yu, 2020. "Mass Appraisal Modeling of Real Estate in Urban Centers by Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression: A Case Study of Beijing’s Core Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Gang-Zhi Fan & Seow Eng Ong & Hian Chye Koh, 2006. "Determinants of House Price: A Decision Tree Approach," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(12), pages 2301-2315, November.
    6. Marco Locurcio & Pierluigi Morano & Francesco Tajani & Felicia Di Liddo, 2020. "An Innovative GIS-Based Territorial Information Tool for the Evaluation of Corporate Properties: An Application to the Italian Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-29, July.
    7. Emil Mendoza & Fabian Dunker & Marco Reale, 2023. "Changes in Risk Appreciation, and Short Memory of House Buyers When the Market is Hot, a Case Study of Christchurch, New Zealand," Papers 2307.13232, arXiv.org.
    8. Jose Torres-Pruñonosa & Pablo García-Estévez & Camilo Prado-Román, 2021. "Artificial Neural Network, Quantile and Semi-Log Regression Modelling of Mass Appraisal in Housing," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Jin Hu & Xuelei Xiong & Yuanyuan Cai & Feng Yuan, 2020. "The Ripple Effect and Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Intra-Urban Housing Prices at the Submarket Level in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Sebastian Gnat, 2021. "Property Mass Valuation on Small Markets," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    11. Mariusz Doszyń, 2024. "Might expert knowledge improve econometric real estate mass appraisal?," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 69(4), pages 719-740, November.
    12. Michalis Doumpos & Dimitrios Papastamos & Dimitrios Andritsos & Constantin Zopounidis, 2021. "Developing automated valuation models for estimating property values: a comparison of global and locally weighted approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 306(1), pages 415-433, November.
    13. Antipov, Evgeny & Pokryshevskaya, Elena, 2010. "Mass appraisal of residential apartments: An application of Random forest for valuation and a CART-based approach for model diagnostics," MPRA Paper 27645, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Daikun Wang & Victor Jing Li, 2019. "Mass Appraisal Models of Real Estate in the 21st Century: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Demetriou, Demetris, 2018. "Automating the land valuation process carried out in land consolidation schemes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 21-32.
    16. Małgorzata Renigier-Biłozor & Sabina Źróbek & Marek Walacik, 2022. "Modern Technologies in the Real Estate Market—Opponents vs. Proponents of Their Use: Does New Category of Value Solve the Problem?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    17. Chmielewska Aneta & Adamiczka Jerzy & Romanowski Michał, 2020. "Genetic Algorithm as Automated Valuation Model Component in Real Estate Investment Decisions System," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 28(4), pages 1-14, December.
    18. Elena B. Pokryshevskaya & Evgeny A. Antipov, 2011. "Applying a CART-based approach for the diagnostics of mass appraisal models," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 31(3), pages 2521-2528.
    19. Alexandre Tangerini & Nils Soguel, 2005. "Evaluation monétaire de la qualité du paysage. Monetary valuation of the landscape quality," Urban/Regional 0507002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Sabina Zrobek & Oleksandra Kovalyshyn & Małgorzata Renigier‐Biłozor & Stepan Kovalyshyn & Oleg Kovalyshyn, 2020. "Fuzzy logic method of valuation supporting sustainable development of the agricultural land market," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1094-1105, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:113:y:2022:i:c:s0264837721005998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.