IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v112y2022ics0264837721005172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trends for agricultural land-use in the CEECs following the collapse of the Eastern Bloc

Author

Listed:
  • Bański, Jerzy
  • Kamińska, Wioletta

Abstract

The main cognitive goal of this study is to diagnose and identify trends for agricultural land-use structure in the CEECs. Particular attention has been paid to the spatial differentiation characterising that structure, and to the significance that diverse kinds of conditioning have had in shaping it. Analysis has extended to the main structural elements that are grasslands and arable land, while the countries included are the CEECs acceding to the EU at different times, i.e. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Croatia, Slovenia and Bulgaria. EUROSTAT and the FAO have been the main sources of relevant materials. The region under study emerges as very much differentiated in terms of structure relating to both grassland and arable uses. However, once the Eastern Bloc fell, all the CEECs experienced losses in area of grassland, as well as declines in the amounts of land growing perennial-type crops. Where key crops were concerned, the shares of industrial species have increased at the expense of the cultivation of vegetables, fruit and potatoes. Key factors underpinning observed trends for land use have been the privatisation and restitution of land, demographic processes in rural areas, domestic and EU agricultural policies, and agroecological conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Bański, Jerzy & Kamińska, Wioletta, 2022. "Trends for agricultural land-use in the CEECs following the collapse of the Eastern Bloc," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:112:y:2022:i:c:s0264837721005172
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105794
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837721005172
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105794?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Petrick, Martin & Weingarten, Peter (ed.), 2004. "The role of agriculture in Central and Eastern European rural development: engine of change or social buffer?," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 25, number 93023, September.
    2. Miroslav Trnka & Josef Eitzinger & Daniela Semerádová & Petr Hlavinka & Jan Balek & Martin Dubrovský & Gerhard Kubu & Petr Štěpánek & Sabina Thaler & Martin Možný & Zdeněk Žalud, 2011. "Expected changes in agroclimatic conditions in Central Europe," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 108(1), pages 261-289, September.
    3. Doucha, Tomas & Divila, Emil & Fischer, Michal, 2005. "Land use and ownership and the Czech farm development," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 3, pages 1-13.
    4. Unknown, 2005. "Agriculture In Transition," Economics of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 52(01).
    5. Rusu, Marioara & Florian, Violeta, 2003. "Rural space and rural development in Romania," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 1, pages 1-17.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gramzow, Andreas, 2009. "Rural development as provision of local public goods: Theory and evidence from Poland," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 51, number 92313, September.
    2. Olivier Blanchard & Michael Kremer, 1997. "Disorganization," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 112(4), pages 1091-1126.
    3. Narayanamoorthy, A. & Hanjra, Munir A., 2006. "Rural Infrastructure and Agricultural Output Linkages: A Study of 256 Indian Districts," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 1-16.
    4. D'Artis Kancs & Pavel Ciaian, 2010. "Factor content of bilateral trade: the role of firm heterogeneity and transaction costs," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(3‐4), pages 305-317, May.
    5. Nataliya Zinych & Martin Odening, 2009. "Capital market imperfections in economic transition: empirical evidence from Ukrainian agriculture," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 40(6), pages 677-689, November.
    6. Štefan Bojnec, 2010. "Rural Tourism, Rural Economy Diversification, and Sustainable Development," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 3(1-2), pages 7-15.
    7. Gregory Clark, 2005. "The Long March of History: Farm Wages, Population and Economic Growth, England 1209-1869," Working Papers 540, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    8. Bogdanov, Natalija & Rodic, Vesna & Vittuari, Matteo, 2012. "Structural Change In Transitional Agriculture: Evidence From Serbia," 132nd Seminar, October 25-27, 2012, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia 139490, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Chevalier, Pascal, 2012. "What Effects Does National Regulation Have On Leader Programming In Eu-27?," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 3(156).
    10. Jerzy BAŃSKI, 2011. "Changes in agricultural land ownership in Poland in the period of the market economy," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(2), pages 93-101.
    11. Heiko Paeth & Daniel Schönbein & Luzia Keupp & Daniel Abel & Freddy Bangelesa & Miriam Baumann & Christian Büdel & Christian Hartmann & Christof Kneisel & Konstantin Kobs & Julian Krause & Martin Krec, 2023. "Climate change information tailored to the agricultural sector in Central Europe, exemplified on the region of Lower Franconia," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(10), pages 1-24, October.
    12. Vlastimir Vukovic, 2011. "Banking Sector Comparative Analysis Serbia vs EU Member States," Book Chapters, in: Mirjana Radovic Markovic & Srdjan Redzepagic & João Sousa Andrade & Paulino Teixeira (ed.), Serbia and the European Union: Economic Lessons from the New Member States, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 18, pages 282-296, Institute of Economic Sciences.
    13. repec:ags:inpuer:188962 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Lela Khartishvili & Andreas Muhar & Thomas Dax & Ioseb Khelashvili, 2019. "Rural Tourism in Georgia in Transition: Challenges for Regional Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, January.
    15. Jan Douwe van der Ploeg, 2016. "Family farming in Europe and Central Asia: history, characteristics, threats and potentials," Working Papers 153, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    16. Ervin, Daniel & Lopéz-Carr, David & Riosmena, Fernando & Ryan, Sadie J., 2020. "Examining the relationship between migration and forest cover change in Mexico from 2001 to 2010," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    17. Mustafa Keski̇n & Osman Canko & Ersin Kantar, 2006. "Dynamic Dipole And Quadrupole Phase Transitions In The Kinetic Spin-1 Model," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(09), pages 1239-1255.
    18. Tleubayev, Alisher & Bobojonov, Ihtiyor & Götz, Linde & Hockmann, Heinrich & Glauben, Thomas, 2017. "Determinants of productivity and efficiency of wheat production in Kazakhstan: A Stochastic Frontier Approach," IAMO Discussion Papers 253397, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    19. Sauer, Johannes & Balint, Borbala, 2006. "Romanian Maize - Distorted Prices and Producer Efficiency," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21410, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    20. Šimon Martin & Bernard Josef, 2016. "Rural Idyll Without Rural Sociology? Changing Features, Functions and Research of the Czech Countryside," Eastern European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 22(1), pages 53-68, December.
    21. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2014. "Environmental management in agriculture - mechanisms, forms and efficiency," MPRA Paper 99852, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:112:y:2022:i:c:s0264837721005172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.