IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v104y2021ics0264837721000788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping private, common, and exclusive common spaces in buildings from BIM/IFC to LADM. A case study from Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Alattas, Abdullah
  • Kalogianni, Eftychia
  • Alzahrani, Thamer
  • Zlatanova, Sisi
  • van Oosterom, Peter

Abstract

This paper presents in detail the legislation and regulation related to the use and ownership of building complexes with multiple units (apartments, condominiums) in Saudi Arabia for the 3D registration of the legal spaces. The 3D Land Administration Domain Model (LADM)country profile for Saudi Arabia must be able to represent the identified concepts for multi-owner buildings. Today, there is a trend to directly design these buildings in 3D. Within the spatial development lifecycle thinking, this design will be reused via Building Information Modelling (BIM)/ Industry Foundation Class (IFC) encodings in the subsequent phases, such as, obtaining permits, financing, constructing, etc. However, in order to support the next step, the cadastral registration, we present, at this paper, a mapping from the BIM/IFC to the LADM, both at conceptual modelling and at the level of the individual units with their geometry and topology. This mapping requires that the BIM/IFC file contains sufficient information to identify the different spaces being part of a property. Three different main type of spaces are identified: private part, common part, and exclusive common part. A single property may contain multiple disconnected components, such as the main apartment, the storage in the basement, and a car park. In turn, a component, such as the main apartment, may contain multiple connected spaces, i.e. the various rooms of the main apartment. In addition to mapping the concepts at class level from IFC to LADM, we also extract rules for treating the spaces of various types of walls, slabs, roofs, and constructive elements, such as foundation and pillars. The presented approach is tested with a real-world example IFC file, identifying the issues to be improved, i.e. guidelines for the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) sector to produce IFC file which can be more easy used as input for 3D Land Administration with minimal manual interventions. This research bridges the gap between the project-oriented world of the AEC sector (with BIM/IFC files) and the legal registration as described through the ISO 19152. Though many of the presented findings are based on the legislation and case study in Saudi Arabia, we have the rather strong impression, that these findings will not be very different in other countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Alattas, Abdullah & Kalogianni, Eftychia & Alzahrani, Thamer & Zlatanova, Sisi & van Oosterom, Peter, 2021. "Mapping private, common, and exclusive common spaces in buildings from BIM/IFC to LADM. A case study from Saudi Arabia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:104:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721000788
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837721000788
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105355?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohamed El-Mekawy & Anders Östman, 2012. "Feasibility of Building Information Models for 3D Cadastre in Unified City Models," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 1(4), pages 35-58, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ying, Shen & Xu, Yifan & Li, Chengpeng & Guo, Renzhong & Li, Lin, 2021. "Easement spatialization with two cases based on LADM and BIM," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Hamad Almujibah, 2023. "Assessment of Building Information Modeling (BIM) as a Time and Cost-Saving Construction Management Tool: Evidence from Two-Story Villas in Jeddah," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    3. van Oosterom, Peter & Unger, Eva-Maria & Lemmen, Christiaan, 2022. "The second themed article collection on the land administration domain model (LADM)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    4. Kara, Abdullah & Lemmen, Christiaan & van Oosterom, Peter & Kalogianni, Eftychia & Alattas, Abdullah & Indrajit, Agung, 2024. "Design of the new structure and capabilities of LADM edition II including 3D aspects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    5. Kalogianni, Eftychia & Dimopoulou, Efi & Gruler, Hans-Christoph & Stubkjær, Erik & Morales, Javier & Lemmen, Christiaan & Van Oosterom, Peter, 2024. "Refining the survey model of the LADM ISO 19152–2: Land registration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Griffith-Charles, Charisse & Sutherland, Michael, 2020. "3D cadastres for densely occupied informal situations: Necessity and possibility," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Guler, Dogus & Yomralioglu, Tahsin, 2022. "Reviewing the literature on the tripartite cycle containing digital building permit, 3D city modeling, and 3D property ownership," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:104:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721000788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.