IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v103y2021ics0264837721000508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agrarian reform in the Brazilian Midwest: Difficulties of modernization via conventional or organic production systems

Author

Listed:
  • Vilpoux, Olivier François
  • Gonzaga, Jenifer Ferreira
  • Pereira, Matheus Wemerson Gomes

Abstract

Small farmers’ adoption of a production system that allows good insertion and competitiveness in the market has always been a challenge. The conventional system, linked to the green revolution, is influenced by scale and financial capacity and is responsible for many environmental problems. To resolve these issues, the Brazilian government has implemented several policies to encourage organic agriculture, many focused on land reform settlements. Despite these incentives, many settlers continue to exhibit low incomes and productivity. In this light, the objective of this study is to identify the production systems used in the settlements of the Midwest region of Brazil and to verify whether these systems are based on organic technologies and whether there is a relationship between the adoption of these systems and the location of the settlements. Policies best suited to the success of agrarian reform, according to adopted production system, are also assessed. A total of 1162 questionnaires were administered in 54 settlements. Four types of production systems were identified: conventional, organic, organic with low technology, and basic. The basic system (without the use of technologies such as chemical and/or organic inputs, crop rotation, improved seeds, and mechanization) is the most common, regardless of the region. Technified systems (conventional and organic) are mostly used in the Cerrado and Atlantic Forest biomes, where large-scale conventional agriculture predominates. The results also reinforce the need for development policies adapted to the producers. Social assistance can be better adapted for settlers with low-tech systems, while efficient technical assistance as well as production and marketing support policies are of great importance for producers with conventional and organic systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Vilpoux, Olivier François & Gonzaga, Jenifer Ferreira & Pereira, Matheus Wemerson Gomes, 2021. "Agrarian reform in the Brazilian Midwest: Difficulties of modernization via conventional or organic production systems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:103:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721000508
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837721000508
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105327?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Priscilla Wainaina & Songporne Tongruksawattana & Matin Qaim, 2016. "Tradeoffs and complementarities in the adoption of improved seeds, fertilizer, and natural resource management technologies in Kenya," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 47(3), pages 351-362, May.
    2. Feder, Gershon & Just, Richard E & Zilberman, David, 1985. "Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 33(2), pages 255-298, January.
    3. David Tilman, 1998. "The greening of the green revolution," Nature, Nature, vol. 396(6708), pages 211-212, November.
    4. Grisa, Catia & Schneider, Sergio, 2014. "Três Gerações de Políticas Públicas para a Agricultura Familiar e Formas de Interação entre Sociedade e Estado no Brasil," Brazilian Journal of Rural Economy and Sociology (Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural-RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 52(Supplemen), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Athanasios Theocharopoulos & Stamatis Aggelopoulos & Panoraia Papanagiotou & Katerina Melfou & Evangelos Papanagiotou, 2012. "Sustainable Farming Systems vs Conventional Agriculture: A Socioeconomic Approach," Chapters, in: Chaouki Ghenai (ed.), Sustainable Development - Education, Business and Management - Architecture and Building Construction - Agriculture and Food Security, IntechOpen.
    6. Daubermann, Elaine Correa & Chagas, Lucas Squarize & Gurgel, Angelo Costa & Sakurai, Sérgio Naruhiko, 2014. "Expansão da Área Agrícola e Produtividade das Culturas no Brasil: testando hipóteses da legislação californiana de biocombustíveis," Brazilian Journal of Rural Economy and Sociology (Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural-RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 52(1), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Pannell, David J. & Llewellyn, Rick S. & Corbeels, Marc, 2013. "The farm-level economics of conservation agriculture for resource-poor farmers," Working Papers 166526, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    8. Conway, Gordon, 2002. "Regenerating the Green Revolution," 2002: Food for the Future: Opportunities for a Crowded Planet, 8 August 2002 123926, Crawford Fund.
    9. Ferreira Gonzaga, Jenifer & Vilpoux, Olivier François & Gomes Pereira, Matheus Wemerson, 2019. "Factors influencing technological practices in the Brazilian agrarian reform," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 150-162.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khushbu Mishra & Abdoul G. Sam & Gracious M. Diiro & Mario J. Miranda, 2020. "Gender and the dynamics of technology adoption: Empirical evidence from a household‐level panel data," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(6), pages 857-870, November.
    2. Tamer El-Shater & Amin Mugera & Yigezu A. Yigezu, 2020. "Implications of Adoption of Zero Tillage (ZT) on Productive Efficiency and Production Risk of Wheat Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, May.
    3. Ferreira Gonzaga, Jenifer & Vilpoux, Olivier François & Gomes Pereira, Matheus Wemerson, 2019. "Factors influencing technological practices in the Brazilian agrarian reform," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 150-162.
    4. Oumer, Ali M. & Burton, Michael, 2018. "Drivers and Synergies in the Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Intensification Practices: A Dynamic Perspective," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273871, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Ruzzante, Sacha & Labarta, Ricardo & Bilton, Amy, 2021. "Adoption of agricultural technology in the developing world: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    6. Fonseca Morello, Thiago, 2022. "Subsidization of mechanized tillage as an alternative to fire-based land preparation by smallholders: An economic appraisal of the case of southwestern Brazilian Amazon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    7. Stella Kiconco & Suresh Chandra Babu & Kenneth Akankwasa, 2022. "Adoption Patterns and Intensity for Multiple BananaTechnologies in Uganda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, November.
    8. Gebremariam, Gebrelibanos & Tesfaye, Wondimagegn, 2018. "The heterogeneous effect of shocks on agricultural innovations adoption: Microeconometric evidence from rural Ethiopia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 154-161.
    9. Kenneth W. Sibiko & Matin Qaim, 2020. "Weather index insurance, agricultural input use, and crop productivity in Kenya," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(1), pages 151-167, February.
    10. Theriault, Veronique & Smale, Melinda & Haider, Hamza, 2017. "How Does Gender Affect Sustainable Intensification of Cereal Production in the West African Sahel? Evidence from Burkina Faso," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 177-191.
    11. Kangogo, Daniel & Dentoni, Domenico & Bijman, Jos, 2021. "Adoption of climate‐smart agriculture among smallholder farmers: Does farmer entrepreneurship matter?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    12. Teklewold, Hailemariam, 2023. "Understanding gender differences on the choices of a portfolio of climate-smart agricultural practices in sub-saharan Africa," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    13. Bisrat Haile Gebrekidan & Thomas Heckelei & Sebastian Rasch, 2023. "Modeling intensification decisions in the Kilombero Valley floodplain: A Bayesian belief network approach," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 54(1), pages 23-43, January.
    14. Sibiko, Kenneth W. & Qaim, Matin, 2017. "Weather Index Insurance, Agricultural Input Use, and Crop Productivity in Kenya," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 256214, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    15. Ouma, James Okuro & De Groote, Hugo & Owuor, George, 2006. "Determinants of Improved Maize Seed and Fertilizer Use in Kenya: Policy Implications," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25433, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Alexander, Corinne E., 2002. "The Role Of Seed Company Supplied Information In Farmers' Decisions," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19617, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Mekonnen, Daniel Ayalew & Gerber, Nicolas & Matz, Julia Anna, 2018. "Gendered Social Networks, Agricultural Innovations, and Farm Productivity in Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 321-335.
    18. Maurizio Vrenna & Pier Paolo Peruccio & Xin Liu & Fang Zhong & Yuchi Sun, 2021. "Microalgae as Future Superfoods: Fostering Adoption through Practice-Based Design Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-26, March.
    19. Langyintuo, Augustine S. & Mungoma, Catherine, 2008. "The effect of household wealth on the adoption of improved maize varieties in Zambia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 550-559, December.
    20. Cuong Le Van & Nguyen To The, 2019. "Farmers’ adoption of organic production," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 33-59, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:103:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721000508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.