IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v67y2020ics0957178720301004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Guidance on the usability-privacy tradeoff for utility customer data aggregation

Author

Listed:
  • Ruddell, Benjamin L.
  • Cheng, Dan
  • Fournier, Eric Daniel
  • Pincetl, Stephanie
  • Potter, Caryn
  • Rushforth, Richard

Abstract

Modern cities, along with their researchers and innovators can benefit from applying " big data" to their sustainability and infrastructure problems and policies, e.g., water and energy consumption. Unfortunately, current utility customer data (UCD) privacy rulemaking fails to ensure safe release of these data for the public benefit and does not currently strike a sound balance between the competing values of usability and privacy. This paper presents a statistical analysis of the tradeoff between usability and privacy for UCD in Los Angeles. The tradeoffs vary by economic sector (residential vs. commercial/industrial) and by utility type (water, electricity, natural gas). This paper provides guidance for safer and more ethically balanced aggregation and release of utility customer data.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruddell, Benjamin L. & Cheng, Dan & Fournier, Eric Daniel & Pincetl, Stephanie & Potter, Caryn & Rushforth, Richard, 2020. "Guidance on the usability-privacy tradeoff for utility customer data aggregation," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:67:y:2020:i:c:s0957178720301004
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2020.101106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178720301004
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2020.101106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Porse, Erik & Derenski, Joshua & Gustafson, Hannah & Elizabeth, Zoe & Pincetl, Stephanie, 2016. "Structural, geographic, and social factors in urban building energy use: Analysis of aggregated account-level consumption data in a megacity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 179-192.
    2. Richard R. Rushforth & Benjamin L. Ruddell, 2015. "The Hydro-Economic Interdependency of Cities: Virtual Water Connections of the Phoenix, Arizona Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-26, June.
    3. Livingston, Olga V. & Pulsipher, Trenton C. & Anderson, David M. & Vlachokostas, Alex & Wang, Na, 2018. "An analysis of utility meter data aggregation and tenant privacy to support energy use disclosure in commercial buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 302-309.
    4. Fournier, Eric D. & Federico, Felicia & Porse, Erik & Pincetl, Stephanie, 2019. "Effects of building size growth on residential energy efficiency and conservation in California," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 446-452.
    5. Sirkiä, Jukka & Laakso, Tuija & Ahopelto, Suvi & Ylijoki, Ossi & Porras, Jari & Vahala, Riku, 2017. "Data utilization at finnish water and wastewater utilities: Current practices vs. state of the art," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 69-75.
    6. van der Schoor, Tineke & Scholtens, Bert, 2015. "Power to the people: Local community initiatives and the transition to sustainable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 666-675.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Asma Alshuhail & Surbhi Bhatia, 2023. "An Improved Partitioning Method via Disassociation towards Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Lee, Dasom & Hess, David J., 2021. "Data privacy and residential smart meters: Comparative analysis and harmonization potential," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Langevin, J. & Reyna, J.L. & Ebrahimigharehbaghi, S. & Sandberg, N. & Fennell, P. & Nägeli, C. & Laverge, J. & Delghust, M. & Mata, É. & Van Hove, M. & Webster, J. & Federico, F. & Jakob, M. & Camaras, 2020. "Developing a common approach for classifying building stock energy models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    2. Porse, Erik & Fournier, Eric & Cheng, Dan & Hirashiki, Claire & Gustafson, Hannah & Federico, Felicia & Pincetl, Stephanie, 2020. "Net solar generation potential from urban rooftops in Los Angeles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    3. Iolanda Saviuc & Herbert Peremans & Steven Van Passel & Kevin Milis, 2019. "Economic Performance of Using Batteries in European Residential Microgrids under the Net-Metering Scheme," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-28, January.
    4. P.W.J. de Bijl & Helanya Fourie, 2019. "The energy transition: Does ownership matter for realizing public interest objectives?," Working Papers 19-24, Utrecht School of Economics.
    5. Frans H. J. M. Coenen & Thomas Hoppe, 2022. "Renewable Energy Communities as a New Actor in Home Energy Savings," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 108-122.
    6. Excell, Lauren E. & Jain, Rishee K., 2024. "Examining the impact of energy efficiency retrofits and vegetation on energy performance of institutional buildings: An equity-driven analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    7. Wang, Jianjun & Liu, Fang & Li, Li & Zhang, Jian, 2022. "More than innovativeness: Comparing residents’ motivations for participating renewable energy communities in different innovation segments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 552-563.
    8. Moroni, Stefano & Antoniucci, Valentina & Bisello, Adriano, 2016. "Energy sprawl, land taking and distributed generation: towards a multi-layered density," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 266-273.
    9. Yael Nidam & Ali Irani & Jamie Bemis & Christoph Reinhart, 2023. "Census-based urban building energy modeling to evaluate the effectiveness of retrofit programs," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(9), pages 2394-2406, November.
    10. Klein, Sharon J.W. & Coffey, Stephanie, 2016. "Building a sustainable energy future, one community at a time," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 867-880.
    11. Fouladvand, Javanshir & Aranguren Rojas, Maria & Hoppe, Thomas & Ghorbani, Amineh, 2022. "Simulating thermal energy community formation: Institutional enablers outplaying technological choice," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    12. Sadik-Zada, Elkhan Richard & Gatto, Andrea, 2023. "Civic engagement and energy transition in the Nordic-Baltic Sea Region: Parametric and nonparametric inquiries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    13. Adil, Ali M. & Ko, Yekang, 2016. "Socio-technical evolution of Decentralized Energy Systems: A critical review and implications for urban planning and policy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1025-1037.
    14. Pol Olivella-Rosell & Pau Lloret-Gallego & Íngrid Munné-Collado & Roberto Villafafila-Robles & Andreas Sumper & Stig Ødegaard Ottessen & Jayaprakash Rajasekharan & Bernt A. Bremdal, 2018. "Local Flexibility Market Design for Aggregators Providing Multiple Flexibility Services at Distribution Network Level," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Huang, Zishuo & Yu, Hang & Chu, Xiangyang & Peng, Zhenwei, 2018. "A novel optimization model based on game tree for multi-energy conversion systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 109-121.
    16. Yang, Ju-Ying & Dodge, Jennifer, 2024. "Local energy transitions as process: How contract management problems stymie a city's sustainable transition to renewable energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    17. Yuki Matsuda & Yuto Yamazaki & Hiromu Oki & Yasuhiro Takeda & Daishi Sagawa & Kenji Tanaka, 2021. "Demonstration of Blockchain Based Peer to Peer Energy Trading System with Real-Life Used PHEV and HEMS Charge Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-12, November.
    18. Chiara Candelise & Gianluca Ruggieri, 2017. "Community Energy in Italy: Heterogeneous institutional characteristics and citizens engagement," IEFE Working Papers 93, IEFE, Center for Research on Energy and Environmental Economics and Policy, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    19. Goedkoop, F. & Dijkstra, J. & Flache, A., 2022. "A social network perspective on involvement in community energy initiatives: The role of direct and extended social ties to initiators," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    20. Hsiao, Yao-Jen & Chen, Jyun-Long & Huang, Cheng-Ting, 2021. "What are the challenges and opportunities in implementing Taiwan's aquavoltaics policy? A roadmap for achieving symbiosis between small-scale aquaculture and photovoltaics," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:67:y:2020:i:c:s0957178720301004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.