IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v50y2018icp207-210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distributed electricity generation from sugarcane for agricultural irrigation: A case study from the midwest region of Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Garcia, Marli da Silva
  • Vilpoux, Olivier François
  • Cereda, Marney Pascoli

Abstract

The Midwest is the largest Brazilian agricultural region, far from major power production units. The availability of energy close to consumption, or distributed generation (DG), can reduce distribution costs and losses. We verified the possibility of using electric power from sugarcane biomass to irrigate corn crops through interviews with sugarcane companies and farmers. Direct commercialization of energy from sugarcane biomass for irrigation is not viable due to energy subsidies received by irrigating farmers. Most sugarcane energy is sold into the national network, without considering its origin. DG has potential, but its development involves the increase of rural energy consumption, such as for irrigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Garcia, Marli da Silva & Vilpoux, Olivier François & Cereda, Marney Pascoli, 2018. "Distributed electricity generation from sugarcane for agricultural irrigation: A case study from the midwest region of Brazil," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 207-210.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:50:y:2018:i:c:p:207-210
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2017.09.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178717302163
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2017.09.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pepermans, G. & Driesen, J. & Haeseldonckx, D. & Belmans, R. & D'haeseleer, W., 2005. "Distributed generation: definition, benefits and issues," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 787-798, April.
    2. de Souza, Fabio Cavaliere & Legey, Luiz Fernando Loureiro, 2010. "Dynamics of risk management tools and auctions in the second phase of the Brazilian Electricity Market reform," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 1715-1733, April.
    3. Chicco, Gianfranco & Mancarella, Pierluigi, 2009. "Distributed multi-generation: A comprehensive view," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 535-551, April.
    4. Bayod-Rújula, Angel A., 2009. "Future development of the electricity systems with distributed generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 377-383.
    5. Rendeiro, Gonçalo & Macedo, Emanuel N. & Pinheiro, Giorgiana & Pinho, João, 2011. "Analysis on the feasibility of biomass power plants adding to the electric power system – Economic, regulatory and market aspects – State of Pará, Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1678-1684.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Garcia, Marli da Silva & Vilpoux, Olivier François & Cereda, Marney Pascoli, 2021. "Institutional arrangements in the commercialization of electric energy from sugarcane biomass in the Brazilian midwest," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 59(3), January.
    2. Caiado Couto, Lilia & Campos, Luiza C. & da Fonseca-Zang, Warde & Zang, Joachim & Bleischwitz, Raimund, 2021. "Water, waste, energy and food nexus in Brazil: Identifying a resource interlinkage research agenda through a systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Funcke, Simon & Bauknecht, Dierk, 2016. "Typology of centralised and decentralised visions for electricity infrastructure," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 67-74.
    2. Blarke, Morten B., 2012. "Towards an intermittency-friendly energy system: Comparing electric boilers and heat pumps in distributed cogeneration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 349-365.
    3. Anuta, Oghenetejiri Harold & Taylor, Phil & Jones, Darren & McEntee, Tony & Wade, Neal, 2014. "An international review of the implications of regulatory and electricity market structures on the emergence of grid scale electricity storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 489-508.
    4. Bouzid, Allal M. & Guerrero, Josep M. & Cheriti, Ahmed & Bouhamida, Mohamed & Sicard, Pierre & Benghanem, Mustapha, 2015. "A survey on control of electric power distributed generation systems for microgrid applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 751-766.
    5. Adil, Ali M. & Ko, Yekang, 2016. "Socio-technical evolution of Decentralized Energy Systems: A critical review and implications for urban planning and policy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1025-1037.
    6. Prakash, Prem & Khatod, Dheeraj K., 2016. "Optimal sizing and siting techniques for distributed generation in distribution systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 111-130.
    7. Colmenar-Santos, Antonio & Reino-Rio, Cipriano & Borge-Diez, David & Collado-Fernández, Eduardo, 2016. "Distributed generation: A review of factors that can contribute most to achieve a scenario of DG units embedded in the new distribution networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1130-1148.
    8. Sanya Carley & Richard Andrews, 2012. "Creating a sustainable U.S. electricity sector: the question of scale," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(2), pages 97-121, June.
    9. Manfren, Massimiliano & Caputo, Paola & Costa, Gaia, 2011. "Paradigm shift in urban energy systems through distributed generation: Methods and models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 1032-1048, April.
    10. Kalkbrenner, Bernhard J. & Yonezawa, Koichi & Roosen, Jutta, 2017. "Consumer preferences for electricity tariffs: Does proximity matter?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 413-424.
    11. Canca, David & Arcos-Vargas, Ángel & Núñez, Fernando, 2018. "Blackout risk mitigation by using medium size gas turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 32-48.
    12. Francesco Pasimeni, 2017. "Adoption and Diffusion of Micro-Grids in Italy. An Analysis of Regional Factors Using Agent-Based Modelling," SPRU Working Paper Series 2017-09, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    13. Mallikarjun, Sreekanth & Lewis, Herbert F., 2014. "Energy technology allocation for distributed energy resources: A strategic technology-policy framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 783-799.
    14. Zhou, Kaile & Yang, Shanlin & Chen, Zhiqiang & Ding, Shuai, 2014. "Optimal load distribution model of microgrid in the smart grid environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 304-310.
    15. Miskinis, Vaclovas & Norvaisa, Egidijus & Galinis, Arvydas & Konstantinaviciute, Inga, 2011. "Trends of distributed generation development in Lithuania," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 4656-4663, August.
    16. Zangiabadi, Mansoureh & Feuillet, Rene & Lesani, Hamid & Hadj-Said, Nouredine & Kvaløy, Jan T., 2011. "Assessing the performance and benefits of customer distributed generation developers under uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1703-1712.
    17. Rani, Preeti & Parkash, Ved & Sharma, Naveen Kumar, 2024. "Technological aspects, utilization and impact on power system for distributed generation: A comprehensive survey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    18. Di Somma, M. & Yan, B. & Bianco, N. & Graditi, G. & Luh, P.B. & Mongibello, L. & Naso, V., 2017. "Multi-objective design optimization of distributed energy systems through cost and exergy assessments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1299-1316.
    19. Yanine, Franco F. & Sauma, Enzo E., 2013. "Review of grid-tie micro-generation systems without energy storage: Towards a new approach to sustainable hybrid energy systems linked to energy efficiency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 60-95.
    20. Howard, B. & Modi, V., 2017. "Examination of the optimal operation of building scale combined heat and power systems under disparate climate and GHG emissions rates," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 280-293.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:50:y:2018:i:c:p:207-210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.