IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v81y2023ics0301420723000442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The composition and evaluation of the strategic value of high seas resources: A theoretical model based on the human–sea relationship

Author

Listed:
  • Guo, Jianke
  • Dong, Mengru
  • Zheng, Miaozhuang
  • Han, Zenglin
  • Li, Fujia

Abstract

The high seas and their resources have become increasingly important in economic geography. The utilization and protection of high seas resources are vital for the health of marine, ecological, economic, and geopolitical environments. However, little is known about the value of high seas resources. This article analyzes the generation mechanism of the value of high seas resources from the perspective of the human–sea relationship by analyzing the interactive relationship between the state and the high seas. It proposes the concept of the strategic value of high seas resources and develops a new theoretical framework around high seas economic activities to evaluate this concept. First, we propose that the utilization of resources should be based on sustainability, that is, high seas economic activities should be performed only within a range that the high seas can carry. Then, being recognized as possessing a commodity value attribute, we propose that high seas resources, as a special commodity, not only have the natural and social attributes of general commodities but also possess geographic attributes. Accordingly, three dimensions of a strategic value assessment (i.e., natural value, degree of demand, and probability of acquisition), are proposed. Finally, we designed technical methods for assessing the strategic value of high seas resources, focusing on three economic activities that utilize the high seas: exploration and production of oil and gas, international shipping, and fishing. Our theoretical method can provide a hypothetical basis and reference for the utilization and protection of high seas resources and global ocean governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo, Jianke & Dong, Mengru & Zheng, Miaozhuang & Han, Zenglin & Li, Fujia, 2023. "The composition and evaluation of the strategic value of high seas resources: A theoretical model based on the human–sea relationship," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:81:y:2023:i:c:s0301420723000442
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420723000442
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103336?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sheng Gao & Huihui Sun & Jinfu Liu & Wei Liu, 2022. "Comprehensive audit evaluation and driving force analysis of various types of marine resources development," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 4371-4386, March.
    2. Costanza, Robert & d'Arge, Ralph & de Groot, Rudolf & Farber, Stephen & Grasso, Monica & Hannon, Bruce & Limburg, Karin & Naeem, Shahid & O'Neill, Robert V. & Paruelo, Jose, 1998. "The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 3-15, April.
    3. Razzaq, Asif & Wang, Shizhen & Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday & Saleh Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz, 2022. "The potency of natural resources on ecological sustainability in PIIGS economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Coffen-Smout, Scott & Herbert, Glen J., 2000. "Submarine cables: a challenge for ocean management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 441-448, November.
    5. Raghvendra Kumar, 2020. "India’s Strategic Interests and Partnership with Island States of Africa in the Western Indian Ocean Region," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 7(2), pages 227-243, August.
    6. Laura Recuero Virto, 2018. "A preliminary assessment of the indicators for Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 14 “Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development”," Policy Papers 2018.03, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
    7. Sebastian Ernst Volkmann & Thomas Kuhn & Felix Lehnen, 2018. "A comprehensive approach for a techno-economic assessment of nodule mining in the deep sea," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 31(3), pages 319-336, October.
    8. Ardron, Jeff & Gjerde, Kristina & Pullen, Sian & Tilot, Virginie, 2008. "Marine spatial planning in the high seas," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 832-839, September.
    9. Scott Moore & Dale Squires, 2016. "Governing the Depths: Conceptualizing the Politics of Deep Sea Resources," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 16(2), pages 101-109, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marshall, C.E. & Glegg, G.A. & Howell, K.L., 2014. "Species distribution modelling to support marine conservation planning: The next steps," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 330-332.
    2. Sheng Gao & Huihui Sun & Jingyi Wang & Wei Liu, 2022. "Evaluation and Countermeasures of High-Quality Development of China’s Marine Economy Based on PSO-SVM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Hendrawan, Dienda C P & Musshoff, Oliver, 2022. "Oil Palm Smallholder Farmers' Livelihood Resilience and Decision Making in Replanting," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322441, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. van der Hoff, Richard & Nascimento, Nathália & Fabrício-Neto, Ailton & Jaramillo-Giraldo, Carolina & Ambrosio, Geanderson & Arieira, Julia & Afonso Nobre, Carlos & Rajão, Raoni, 2022. "Policy-oriented ecosystem services research on tropical forests in South America: A systematic literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    5. Evans, Nicole M. & Carrozzino-Lyon, Amy L. & Galbraith, Betsy & Noordyk, Julia & Peroff, Deidre M. & Stoll, John & Thompson, Aaron & Winden, Matthew W. & Davis, Mark A., 2019. "Integrated ecosystem service assessment for landscape conservation design in the Green Bay watershed, Wisconsin," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    6. Desbureaux, Sébastien & Brimont, Laura, 2015. "Between economic loss and social identity: The multi-dimensional cost of avoiding deforestation in Eastern Madagascar," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 10-20.
    7. Shrestha, Ram K. & Seidl, Andrew F. & Moraes, Andre S., 2002. "Value of recreational fishing in the Brazilian Pantanal: a travel cost analysis using count data models," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1-2), pages 289-299, August.
    8. Ya, Du & Quddus, Abdul & Feng, Minhong & Ullah, Ehsan & Ameer, Waqar, 2024. "Assessing the impact of fiscal policy and natural resources on environmental degradation in BRICS countries: A resource management perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    9. Sangha, Kamaljit K & Evans, Jay & Edwards, Andrew & Russell-Smith, Jeremy & Fisher, Rohan & Yates, Cameron & Costanza, Robert, 2021. "Assessing the value of ecosystem services delivered by prescribed fire management in Australian tropical savannas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    10. Dai, Xuhuan & Li, Bo & Zheng, Hua & Yang, Yanzheng & Yang, Zihan & Peng, Chenchen, 2023. "Can sedentarization decrease the dependence of pastoral livelihoods on ecosystem services?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    11. Shaokang Fu & Lin Zhao & Zhi Qiao & Tong Sun & Meng Sun & Yuying Hao & Siyu Hu & Yanchang Zhang, 2021. "Development of Ecosystem Health Assessment (EHA) and Application Method: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Jiayi Zhou & Kangning Xiong & Qi Wang & Jiuhan Tang & Li Lin, 2022. "A Review of Ecological Assets and Ecological Products Supply: Implications for the Karst Rocky Desertification Control," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Neville D Crossman & Jeffrey D Connor & Brett A Bryan & David A Summers & John Ginnivan, 2009. "Reconfiguring an Irrigation Landscape to Improve Provision of Ecosystem Services," Socio-Economics and the Environment in Discussion (SEED) Working Paper Series 2009-07, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems.
    14. Sebastian Ernst Volkmann & Thomas Kuhn & Felix Lehnen, 2018. "A comprehensive approach for a techno-economic assessment of nodule mining in the deep sea," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 31(3), pages 319-336, October.
    15. Yunrui Yang & Jiaying Zhang & Yi’na Hu, 2024. "Land Use Intensity Alters Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand as Well as Their Interaction: A Spatial Zoning Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-15, August.
    16. Fan, Fan & Henriksen, Christian Bugge & Porter, John, 2016. "Valuation of ecosystem services in organic cereal crop production systems with different management practices in relation to organic matter input," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(PA), pages 117-127.
    17. Vorstius, Anne Carolin & Spray, Christopher J., 2015. "A comparison of ecosystem services mapping tools for their potential to support planning and decision-making on a local scale," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 15(C), pages 75-83.
    18. Chen, Yu & Liu, Gengyuan & Yan, Ningyu & Yang, Qing & Gao, He & Su, Liya & Santagata, Remo, 2023. "Comprehensive evaluation of urban greenspace ecological values marketability through the spatial relationship between housing price and ecosystem services," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 484(C).
    19. Zhichao Zhang & Yang Wang & Haisheng Tang & Zhen Zhu, 2023. "Analysis and Prediction of Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Ecosystem Service Value on the Northern Slopes of the Kunlun Mountains Based on Land Use," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, November.
    20. Exley, G. & Hernandez, R.R. & Page, T. & Chipps, M. & Gambro, S. & Hersey, M. & Lake, R. & Zoannou, K.-S. & Armstrong, A., 2021. "Scientific and stakeholder evidence-based assessment: Ecosystem response to floating solar photovoltaics and implications for sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:81:y:2023:i:c:s0301420723000442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.