IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v74y2021ics030142072100252x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Overlapping of natural stone mining field with high-speed train project in Turkey: Was the economic public benefit evaluation made sufficiently?

Author

Listed:
  • Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz

Abstract

Unlike many other land uses, the area on which mineral extraction can be done is limited. The fact that the mines have to be produced where they exist without being able to choose a location brings along other benefits and area usage overlaps. A remarkable example of a mining-infrastructure investment overlap is the overlap between a natural stone operation site and a high-speed train project in Nevşehir. The Audit On-Site Committee examined the overlapping mine sites. Based on the report of the Committee, it was decided in favor of the railway activity. In this report, it was detected that mining activities can be conducted on the condition that mining operating license area is reduced due to the high-speed train line. Yet, a significant part of mine production area overlapped with the high-speed train line. Following the evaluations made considering the economic public benefit, it was decided that the high-speed train project should be given priority in the overlapping area. In these evaluations, it was taken into consideration that the contribution of high-speed train investment to the area would be higher compared to mining investment and that shifting the project towards another area would be more costly. In this study, the economic public interest evaluation made by the Committee is discussed in terms of the methods that should be applied in cost-benefit analysis. It was determined that a practical but non-exhaustive method was applied in the cost-benefit analysis, which is the basis for the economic public interest evaluation made by the committee. To see the application more clearly, the deficiencies in the calculation made by the Committee are completed. This calculation and method application by the Committee were compared with the methods that should be applied in cost-benefit analysis. These kinds of investment overlaps may cause project route alterations in the billion-dollar infrastructure investments. Solutions were offered on the subject of Audit On-Site Committee evaluations, which were effective in this, across Turkey.

Suggested Citation

  • Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz, 2021. "Overlapping of natural stone mining field with high-speed train project in Turkey: Was the economic public benefit evaluation made sufficiently?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:74:y:2021:i:c:s030142072100252x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142072100252X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102241?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hund, Kirsten & Schure, Jolien & van der Goes, Arend, 2017. "Extractive industries in forest landscapes: options for synergy with REDD+ and development of standards in the Democratic Republic of Congo," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 97-108.
    2. Imbun, Benedict Y., 2013. "Maintaining land use agreements in Papua New Guinea Mining: ‘Business as usual’?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 310-319.
    3. Pedersen, Rasmus Hundsbæk & Kweka, Opportuna, 2017. "The political economy of petroleum investments and land acquisition standards in Africa: The case of Tanzania," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 217-225.
    4. Musgrave, Richard A, 1969. "Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Theory of Public Finance," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 7(3), pages 797-806, September.
    5. Siqueira-Gay, Juliana & Sonter, Laura J. & Sánchez, Luis E., 2020. "Exploring potential impacts of mining on forest loss and fragmentation within a biodiverse region of Brazil's northeastern Amazon," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    6. William I. Davisson, 1964. "Public Investment Criteria," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 40(2), pages 153-162.
    7. Weldegiorgis, Fitsum S. & Ali, Saleem H., 2016. "Mineral resources and localised development: Q-methodology for rapid assessment of socioeconomic impacts in Rwanda," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1-11.
    8. Fiedeń, Łukasz, 2019. "Changes in land use in the communes crossed by the A4 motorway in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 397-406.
    9. Kivinen, Mari & Eilu, Pasi & Markovaara-Koivisto, Mira, 2021. "Mineral futures in land-use planning: Foresight tools and case studies in Northern Finland," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    10. Walsh, Bríd & van der Plank, Sien & Behrens, Paul, 2017. "The effect of community consultation on perceptions of a proposed mine: A case study from southeast Australia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 163-171.
    11. Wrighton, C.E. & Bee, E.J. & Mankelow, J.M., 2014. "The development and implementation of mineral safeguarding policies at national and local levels in the United Kingdom," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 160-170.
    12. Rao, Yongheng & Zhang, Jianjun & Wang, Ke & Wu, Xia, 2019. "How to prioritize protected areas: A novel perspective using multidimensional land use characteristics," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1-12.
    13. Jin, Wanfu & Zhou, Chunshan & Zhang, Guojun, 2020. "Characteristics of state-owned construction land supply in Chinese cities by development stage and industry," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    14. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz & Kural, Orhan, 2020. "The effects of the mining operation activities permit process on the mining sector in Turkey," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    15. Demirbugan, Alper, 2019. "Changes in ecosystem service benefit in Soma lignite region of Turkey," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    16. Schure, Jolien & Ingram, Verina & Tieguhong, Julius Chupezi & Ndikumagenge, Cleto, 2011. "Is the god of diamonds alone? The role of institutions in artisanal mining in forest landscapes, Congo Basin," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 363-371.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz, 2021. "Overlapping of mine sites and highway route in Turkey: Evaluation in terms of mining land use criteria and land-use planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    2. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz, 2021. "Possible effects of mining zone regulation on mining companies in Turkey & evaluation of mining companies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz & Kural, Orhan, 2020. "The effects of the mining operation activities permit process on the mining sector in Turkey," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    4. Stefanie Streit & Michael Tost & Katharina Gugerell, 2023. "Perspectives on Closure and Revitalisation of Extraction Sites and Sustainability: A Q-Methodology Study," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz, 2022. "Are the compensations given to mining enterprises due to the overlapping with other investments in Turkey enough? Expectations of compensation for profit deprivation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    6. Diana Bobikova & Zofia Kuzevicova & Stefan Kuzevic & Ibrahim Alkhalaf, 2022. "Proposal of a New Approach for Protected Deposit Area Registration in Public Administration Information Systems—A Case Study from Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz, 2021. "How can the effects of EIA procedures and legislation foreseen for the mining operation activities to mining change positively in Turkey?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    8. Poncian, Japhace & Jose, Jim, 2019. "National resource ownership and community engagement in Tanzania's natural gas governance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    9. Mercer-Mapstone, Lucy & Rifkin, Will & Moffat, Kieren & Louis, Winnifred, 2017. "Conceptualising the role of dialogue in social licence to operate," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 137-146.
    10. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/7067 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Khan, Naqib Ullah & Zhongyi, Peng & Ullah, Asad & Mumtaz, Muhammad, 2024. "A comprehensive evaluation of sustainable mineral resources governance in Pakistan: An analysis of challenges and reforms," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    12. Lèbre, Éléonore & Owen, John R. & Kemp, Deanna & Valenta, Rick K., 2022. "Complex orebodies and future global metal supply: An introduction," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    13. Henry Aray & Janeth Pacheco-Delgado, 2022. "Fiscal Decentralization and the Allocation of Public Spending of Subnational Governments. The Case of Ecuador," ThE Papers 22/01, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
    14. Gilberto MURARO, 1988. "Les Objectifs Dans L'Evaluation Des Investissements Publics," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 23-42, January.
    15. Matlaba, Valente J. & Mota, José Aroudo & Maneschy, Maria Cristina & Filipe dos Santos, Jorge, 2017. "Social perception at the onset of a mining development in Eastern Amazonia, Brazil," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 157-166.
    16. Katherine C. Malpeli & Peter G. Chirico, 2013. "The influence of geomorphology on the role of women at artisanal and small‐scale mine sites," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 37(1), pages 43-54, February.
    17. Zhifeng Zhang & Yuping Tang & Hongyi Pan & Caiyi Yao & Tianyi Zhang, 2022. "Assessment of the Ecological Protection Effectiveness of Protected Areas Using Propensity Score Matching: A Case Study in Sichuan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-15, April.
    18. Yu Liu & Zhuorui Yu & Daining Liu & Hao Zhang & Long Zhou & Guoqiang Shen & Chasong Zhu & Yiheng Sun & Yanran Wang, 2022. "Triple Spatial Effects of the Administrative Hierarchy on Urban Built-Up Areas in Fujian Province, China: Heterogeneity, Radiation, and Segmentation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-24, December.
    19. Guo, Jingpeng & Zhao, Yinghui & Li, Frank Yonghong & Mao, Kebiao & He, Jinfeng & He, Qiang, 2024. "Developing a land development compensation model for returned land in tract expropriation: Towards a unified urban-rural land market in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    20. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/7067 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Farahani, Hossein & Bayazidi, Shadi, 2018. "Modeling the assessment of socio-economical and environmental impacts of sand mining on local communities: A case study of Villages Tatao River Bank in North-western part of Iran," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 87-95.
    22. José Ngidjima & Vincent Lagarde, 2015. "La stratégie d’entreprise responsable est-elle pertinente dans un pays peu développé et instable ? Approche par les performances des coopératives minières en RD Congo," Post-Print hal-01178340, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:74:y:2021:i:c:s030142072100252x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.