IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v71y2021ics0301420720309971.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benefit sharing, power, and the performance of multi-stakeholder institutions at Ghana's Ahafo mine

Author

Listed:
  • Szoke-Burke, Sam
  • Werker, Eric

Abstract

This article examines the role of power, influence, and participation in driving the formation and operation of project-level multi-stakeholder institutions (MSIs), matching political economy theory with case study evidence from the Ahafo gold mine in Ghana. In Ahafo, MSIs were created through benefit-sharing agreements between the mining company and local communities in order to set and manage the distribution of benefits from the mining rents. Drawing on field interviews and other data, we find that the MSIs reflected existing power structures and struggled to enable broad-based participation in decision-making concerning benefit sharing and beyond. Despite having new institutions, and partly because of them, the ability of many stakeholders to influence the distribution of rents from the mine did not increase. The findings point to the role that complex political dynamics play in shaping the formation and implementation of project-level MSIs.

Suggested Citation

  • Szoke-Burke, Sam & Werker, Eric, 2021. "Benefit sharing, power, and the performance of multi-stakeholder institutions at Ghana's Ahafo mine," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:71:y:2021:i:c:s0301420720309971
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420720309971
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101969?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Menaldo,Victor, 2016. "The Institutions Curse," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107138605, September.
    2. Steinberg,Jessica, 2019. "Mines, Communities, and States," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108476935, September.
    3. Menaldo,Victor, 2016. "The Institutions Curse," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781316503362, September.
    4. Anica Zeyen & Markus Beckmann & Stella Wolters, 2016. "Actor and Institutional Dynamics in the Development of Multi-stakeholder Initiatives," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 341-360, May.
    5. Acemoglu, Daron & Robinson, James A., 2000. "Democratization or repression?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(4-6), pages 683-693, May.
    6. Ellen M. Immergut, 1998. "The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism," Politics & Society, , vol. 26(1), pages 5-34, March.
    7. Elaine Lawson & Gloria Bentil, 2014. "Shifting sands: changes in community perceptions of mining in Ghana," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 217-238, February.
    8. Kidido, J.K & Ayitey, J.Z & Kuusaana, E.D & Gavu, E.K, 2015. "Who is the rightful recipient of mining compensation for land use deprivation in Ghana?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 19-27.
    9. Mena, Sébastien & Palazzo, Guido, 2012. "Input and Output Legitimacy of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(3), pages 527-556, July.
    10. Daniel Owusu-Ansah & Edward Brenya & David Damtar, 2015. "Corporate Social Responsibility of Mining Companies in Ghana: The case of Newmont Ghana Gold Limited at Ahafo," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 6(4), pages 52-70.
    11. Tina Søreide & Rory Truex, 2013. "Multi-stakeholder Groups for Better Sector Performance: A Key to Fighting Corruption in Natural-Resource Governance?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 31(2), pages 203-217, March.
    12. Festus Boamah, 2014. "How and why chiefs formalise land use in recent times: the politics of land dispossession through biofuels investments in Ghana," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(141), pages 406-423, September.
    13. Mary Hallward-Driemeier & Lant Pritchett, 2015. "How Business Is Done in the Developing World: Deals versus Rules," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(3), pages 121-140, Summer.
    14. Nicolas Faysse, 2006. "Troubles on the way: An analysis of the challenges faced by multi‐stakeholder platforms," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 30(3), pages 219-229, August.
    15. Dubois, Anna & Gadde, Lars-Erik, 2002. "Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 553-560, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gunton, Thomas & Werker, Eric & Markey, Sean, 2021. "Community benefit agreements and natural resource development: Achieving better outcomes," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    2. Ciaran O'Faircheallaigh & Sally Babidge, 2023. "Negotiated Agreements, Indigenous Peoples and Extractive Industry in the Salar de Atacama, Chile: When Is an Agreement More than a Contract?," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(3), pages 641-670, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manon Eikelenboom & Thomas B. Long, 2023. "Breaking the Cycle of Marginalization: How to Involve Local Communities in Multi-stakeholder Initiatives?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 31-62, August.
    2. Ahmed, Abubakari & Kuusaana, Elias Danyi & Gasparatos, Alexandros, 2018. "The role of chiefs in large-scale land acquisitions for jatropha production in Ghana: insights from agrarian political economy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 570-582.
    3. Mehrdad Vahabi, 2017. "A critical survey of the resource curse literature through the appropriability lens," CEPN Working Papers 2017-14, Centre d'Economie de l'Université de Paris Nord.
    4. Matata Ponyo Mapon & Jean-Paul K. Tsasa, 2019. "The artefact of the Natural Resources Curse," Papers 1911.09681, arXiv.org.
    5. Domenico Dentoni & Verena Bitzer & Greetje Schouten, 2018. "Harnessing Wicked Problems in Multi-stakeholder Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 333-356, June.
    6. Frolov, Daniil, 2019. "From institutions to extitutions to the post-institutional theory of institutional anomalies," MPRA Paper 95960, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Sep 2019.
    7. Medase, S. Kehinde & Ahali, Aaron Yaw & Belitski, Maksim, 2023. "Natural resources, quality of institutions and entrepreneurship activity," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    8. Awoa, Paul Awoa & Efogo, Françoise Okah & Ondoa, Henri Atangana, 2023. "Oil dependence and entrepreneurship: Non-linear evidence," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 47(1).
    9. Harris, Adam S. & Sigman, Rachel & Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik & Mikkelsen, Kim Sass & Schuster, Christian, 2020. "Oiling the bureaucracy? political spending, bureaucrats and the resource curse," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    10. Evan Wigton-Jones, 2020. "Legacies of inequality: the case of Brazil," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 455-501, December.
    11. repec:hal:cepnwp:hal-01583595 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Frolov, Daniil, 2018. "От Институтов К Экститутам И Далее - К Теории Институциональных Аномалий [From Institutions to Extitutions to the Theory of Institutional Anomalies]," MPRA Paper 90286, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. repec:hal:cepnwp:hal-01583559 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Mehrdad Vahabi, 2017. "Coercive state, resisting society, political and economic development in Iran," CEPN Working Papers 2017-17, Centre d'Economie de l'Université de Paris Nord.
    15. Awoa Awoa, Paul & Oyono, Jean Cedric & Ngah Atangana, Bénédicte & Okere Atanga, Donald & Zeh, Inès Perolde, 2022. "Natural resource and entrepreneurship: Economic freedom matters," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    16. Idemudia, Uwafiokun & Tuokuu, Francis Xavier D. & Essah, Marcellinus, 2022. "The extractive industry and human rights in Africa: Lessons from the past and future directions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    17. Ahmed, Faisal Z. & Schwab, Daniel & Werker, Eric, 2021. "The political transfer problem: How cross-border financial windfalls affect democracy and civil war," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 313-339.
    18. Kansanga, Moses Mosonsieyiri & Ahmed, Abubakari & Kuusaana, Elias Danyi & Oteng-Ababio, Martin & Luginaah, Isaac, 2020. "Of waste facility siting and relational geographies of place: Peri-urban landfills, community resistance and the politics of land control in Ghana," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    19. Verena Bitzer & Alessia Marazzi, 2021. "Southern sustainability initiatives in agricultural value chains: a question of enhanced inclusiveness? The case of Trustea in India," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(2), pages 381-395, June.
    20. Melani Cammett & Ishac Diwan & Andrew Leber, 2019. "Is Oil Wealth Good for Private Sector Development?," Working Papers 1299, Economic Research Forum, revised 2019.
    21. Nyantakyi-Frimpong, Hanson, 2020. "What lies beneath: Climate change, land expropriation, and zaï agroecological innovations by smallholder farmers in Northern Ghana," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    22. Daniel Schuster & Ivo Mossig, 2022. "Power Relations in Multistakeholder Initiatives—A Case Study of the German Initiative on Sustainable Cocoa (GISCO)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-16, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:71:y:2021:i:c:s0301420720309971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.