IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v46y2015ip1p15-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a sustainable development framework in the context of mining industries: AHP approach

Author

Listed:
  • Shen, Lixin
  • Muduli, Kamalakanta
  • Barve, Akhilesh

Abstract

Although mining companies contribute positively to the social and economical components of sustainable development (SD) by generating employment and wealth, they still negatively contribute to the ecological component of SD. Therefore, mining companies are increasingly showing their inclination toward the adoption of green supply chain management (GSCM) in order to improve their ecological performance. With an extensive literature survey, various criteria and sub-criteria for improving the effectiveness of GSCM implementation are identified from the literature. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used to evaluate the competitive priorities of these criteria, and interested organizations can use it as a procedural guidance for GSCM implementation. It has been found that mining companies have not given the “soft” factors of GSCM adequate attention. This study explores how the “appropriate implementation approach” and “continuous improvement” are the weaker areas of GSCM practice in the case of the Indian mining sector. Hence, mining industries need to focus on these weaker areas and bring necessary improvements to these areas in order to enhance their GSCM performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Shen, Lixin & Muduli, Kamalakanta & Barve, Akhilesh, 2015. "Developing a sustainable development framework in the context of mining industries: AHP approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P1), pages 15-26.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:46:y:2015:i:p1:p:15-26
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.10.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420713000871
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.10.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mikesell, Raymond F, 1994. "Viewpoint : Sustainable development and mineral resources," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 83-86, June.
    2. Qinghua Zhu & Yong Geng & Tsuyoshi Fujita & Shizuka Hashimoto, 2010. "Green supply chain management in leading manufacturers," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(4), pages 380-392, March.
    3. Y. Sharma & P. Aggarwal & T. Singh, 2009. "Economic liabilities of environmental pollution by coal mining: Indian scenario," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 589-599, June.
    4. Thomas L. Saaty, 1986. "Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(7), pages 841-855, July.
    5. Mudd, Gavin M., 2007. "Global trends in gold mining: Towards quantifying environmental and resource sustainability," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-2), pages 42-56.
    6. Saaty, Thomas L., 1990. "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 9-26, September.
    7. Mudd, Gavin M., 2010. "The Environmental sustainability of mining in Australia: key mega-trends and looming constraints," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 98-115, June.
    8. Hilson, Gavin & Murck, Barbara, 2000. "Sustainable development in the mining industry: clarifying the corporate perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 227-238, December.
    9. Prno, Jason & Scott Slocombe, D., 2012. "Exploring the origins of ‘social license to operate’ in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 346-357.
    10. Fleury, Anne-Marie & Davies, Bejamin, 2012. "Sustainable supply chains—minerals and sustainable development, going beyond the mine," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 175-178.
    11. Antony Paulraj, 2009. "Environmental motivations: a classification scheme and its impact on environmental strategies and practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 453-468, November.
    12. Chikkatur, Ananth P. & Sagar, Ambuj D. & Sankar, T.L., 2009. "Sustainable development of the Indian coal sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 942-953.
    13. Peter A. Strachan & Ivor McKay Sinclair & David Lal, 2003. "Managing ISO 14001 implementation in the United Kingdom Continental Shelf (UKCS)," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 50-63, March.
    14. Hilson, Gavin, 2012. "Corporate Social Responsibility in the extractive industries: Experiences from developing countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 131-137.
    15. Aubynn, Anthony, 2009. "Sustainable solution or a marriage of inconvenience? The coexistence of large-scale mining and artisanal and small-scale mining on the Abosso Goldfields concession in Western Ghana," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1-2), pages 64-70.
    16. Esteves, A.M., 2008. "Mining and social development: Refocusing community investment using multi-criteria decision analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 39-47, March.
    17. G. Kannan & A. Noorul Haq & P. Sasikumar, 2008. "An application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process in the selection of collecting centre location for the reverse logistics Multicriteria Decision-Making supply ," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(4), pages 350-365.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olsen, Brett C. & Awuah-Offei, Kwame & Bumblauskas, Daniel, 2021. "Setting materiality thresholds for ESG disclosures: A case study of U. S. mine safety disclosures," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    2. Fuisz-Kehrbach, Sonja-Katrin, 2015. "A three-dimensional framework to explore corporate sustainability activities in the mining industry: Current status and challenges ahead," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P1), pages 101-115.
    3. Endl, Andreas & Tost, Michael & Hitch, Michael & Moser, Peter & Feiel, Susanne, 2021. "Europe's mining innovation trends and their contribution to the sustainable development goals: Blind spots and strong points," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    4. Vintró, Carla & Fortuny, Jordi & Sanmiquel, Lluís & Freijo, Modesto & Edo, Joaquín, 2012. "Is corporate social responsibility possible in the mining sector? Evidence from Catalan companies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 118-125.
    5. Prince Amoah & Gabriel Eweje, 2021. "Impact mitigation or ecological restoration? Examining the environmental sustainability practices of multinational mining companies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 551-565, January.
    6. Sinan Erzurumlu, S. & Erzurumlu, Yaman O., 2015. "Sustainable mining development with community using design thinking and multi-criteria decision analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P1), pages 6-14.
    7. Govindan, K. & Muduli, K. & Devika, K. & Barve, A., 2016. "Investigation of the influential strength of factors on adoption of green supply chain management practices: An Indian mining scenario," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 185-194.
    8. Van Alstine, James & Barkemeyer, Ralf, 2014. "Business and development: Changing discourses in the extractive industries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 4-16.
    9. Pons, Adrià & Vintrò, Carla & Rius, Josep & Vilaplana, Jordi, 2021. "Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility in mining industries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    10. Corrigan, Caitlin C., 2018. "Corporate social responsibility and local context: The case of mining in Southern Africa," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 233-243.
    11. Bongani Munkuli & Renee Horne, 2018. "Financial Markets Value Reputation for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) – A Study of the South African Mining Sector," Africagrowth Agenda, Africagrowth Institute, vol. 15(2), pages 17-22.
    12. Attari, Mahdi Yousefi Nejad & Torkayesh, Ali Ebadi, 2018. "Developing benders decomposition algorithm for a green supply chain network of mine industry: Case of Iranian mine industry," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 371-382.
    13. Amoako, Kwame Oduro & Lord, Beverley R. & Dixon, Keith, 2021. "Narrative accounting for mining in Ghana: An old defence against a new threat?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    14. Badera Jarosław, 2014. "Problems of the social non-acceptance of mining projects with particular emphasis on the European Union – a literature review," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 2(1), pages 27-34, March.
    15. Adomako, Samuel & Tran, Mai Dong, 2022. "Sustainable environmental strategy, firm competitiveness, and financial performance: Evidence from the mining industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    16. Karakaya, Emrah & Nuur, Cali, 2018. "Social sciences and the mining sector: Some insights into recent research trends," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 257-267.
    17. Devenin, Veronica & Bianchi, Constanza, 2019. "Characterizing a mining space: Analysis from case studies in Chile and Australia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Franks, Daniel M. & Boger, David V. & Côte, Claire M. & Mulligan, David R., 2011. "Sustainable development principles for the disposal of mining and mineral processing wastes," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 114-122, June.
    19. Wenshuai Wu & Gang Kou, 2016. "A group consensus model for evaluating real estate investment alternatives," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-10, December.
    20. Ki‐Hoon Lee, 2017. "Does Size Matter? Evaluating Corporate Environmental Disclosure in the Australian Mining and Metal Industry: A Combined Approach of Quantity and Quality Measurement," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 209-223, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:46:y:2015:i:p1:p:15-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.