IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v36y2011i3p214-226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What are the implications of human rights for minerals taxation?

Author

Listed:
  • Southalan, John

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between a state's taxation of mineral revenues and the human rights obligation to use 'maximum available resources' to further citizens' welfare. These both have implications for understanding the other but there has been little attention to their interaction. Contemporary (economic and policy) approaches to mineral taxation revolve around economic rent and providing a 'neutral' economic environment that does not influence investment decisions. There is no reference to human rights obligations--these are just part of the state's general responsibilities for which it can legitimately raise taxes. Taxation analysis largely ignores whether the state wants money to ensure there is adequate food for the population, or instead to stage the Miss Universe pageant. Human rights has relevance for the state's management of resources. The requirement for states to apply 'maximum available resources' to fulfil human rights suggests that mineral extraction (and taxation) should occur as fast as possible to be applied for the human rights of the current population A more considered analysis weighs against such a literal interpretation. Nevertheless, the requirement of using 'maximum available resources' to fulfil human rights has important implications for mineral taxation.

Suggested Citation

  • Southalan, John, 2011. "What are the implications of human rights for minerals taxation?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 214-226, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:36:y:2011:i:3:p:214-226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420711000250
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lange, Glenn-Marie & Wright, Matthew, 2004. "Sustainable development in mineral economies: the example of Botswana," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(4), pages 485-505, August.
    2. repec:idb:brikps:publication-detail,7101.html?id=23839 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. O'Regan, Bernadette & Moles, Richard, 2004. "The dynamics of relative attractiveness--a case study in mineral exploration and development," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 73-87, May.
    4. Anthony Bebbington & Leonith Hinojosa & Denise Humphreys Bebbington & Maria Luisa Burneo & Ximena Warnaars, 2008. "Contention and Ambiguity: Mining and the Possibilities of Development," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 5708, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    5. Stevens, Paul & Dietsche, Evelyn, 2008. "Resource curse: An analysis of causes, experiences and possible ways forward," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 56-65, January.
    6. Godfrey R.A. Dunkley, 2000. "Republic of South Africa," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 299-311, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tapan Sarker, 2013. "Taxing for the future: an intergenerational perspective," Chapters, in: Moazzem Hossain & Tapan Sarker & Malcolm McIntosh (ed.), The Asian Century, Sustainable Growth and Climate Change, chapter 4, pages 85-110, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James Haselip, 2011. "Transparency, consultation and conflict: Assessing the micro‐level risks surrounding the drive to develop Peru's Amazonian oil and gas resources," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 35(4), pages 283-292, November.
    2. Cem Iskender Aydin & Begum Ozkaynak & Beatriz Rodríguez-Labajos & Taylan Yenilmez, 2017. "Network effects in environmental justice struggles: An investigation of conflicts between mining companies and civil society organizations from a network perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Ishmael Festus Jaja & Borden Mushonga & Ezekiel Green & Voster Muchenje, 2017. "A Quantitative Assessment of Causes of Bovine Liver Condemnation and Its Implication for Food Security in the Eastern Cape Province South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-13, May.
    4. Machado E Silva, Isabela Morbach & Medeiros Costa, Hirdan Katarina de, 2019. "Brazilian Social Funds: The lessons learned from the Norway fund experience," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 161-167.
    5. Pierre Mukheibir, 2008. "Water Resources Management Strategies for Adaptation to Climate-Induced Impacts in South Africa," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 22(9), pages 1259-1276, September.
    6. Veronica Devenin & Constanza Bianchi, 2018. "Soccer fields? What for? Effectiveness of corporate social responsibility initiatives in the mining industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 866-879, September.
    7. Karolien van Teijlingen & Barbara Hogenboom, 2016. "Debating Alternative Development at the Mining Frontier: Buen Vivir and the Conflict around El Mirador Mine in Ecuador," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 32(4), pages 382-420, December.
    8. Van Alstine, James & Barkemeyer, Ralf, 2014. "Business and development: Changing discourses in the extractive industries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 4-16.
    9. Gavin Capps, 2012. "Victim of its own success? The platinum mining industry and the apartheid mineral property system in South Africa's political transition," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(131), pages 63-84, January.
    10. Arezki, Rabah & Hadri, Kaddour & Loungani, Prakash & Rao, Yao, 2014. "Testing the Prebisch–Singer hypothesis since 1650: Evidence from panel techniques that allow for multiple breaks," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 208-223.
    11. Gezani Mazibuko, 2020. "Public Sector Procurement Practice: A Leadership Brainteaser in South Africa," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9.
    12. Matias Ramirez & Ian Clarke & Laurens Klerkx, 2018. "Analysing intermediary organisations and their influence on upgrading in emerging agricultural clusters," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(6), pages 1314-1335, September.
    13. Doreen Fedrigo-Fazio & Jean-Pierre Schweitzer & Patrick Ten Brink & Leonardo Mazza & Alison Ratliff & Emma Watkins, 2016. "Evidence of Absolute Decoupling from Real World Policy Mixes in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Matata Ponyo Mapon & Jean-Paul K. Tsasa, 2019. "The artefact of the Natural Resources Curse," Papers 1911.09681, arXiv.org.
    15. Lee, Chien-Chiang & He, Zhi-Wen, 2022. "Natural resources and green economic growth: An analysis based on heterogeneous growth paths," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    16. Orihuela, José Carlos & Mendieta, Arturo & Pérez, Carlos & Ramírez, Tania, 2021. "From paper institutions to bureaucratic autonomy: Institutional change as a resource curse remedy," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    17. Elizabeth Muller & Rudi Pretorius & Vasna Ramasar & Marian Jane Patrick & Chantal Will & Michelle Binedell, 2006. "Reporting On The State Of The Environment: South African Experiences," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(02), pages 111-134.
    18. Wang, Jian & Huang, Xu & Hu, Ke & Li, Xin, 2018. "Evaluation on community development programs in mining industry: A case study of small and medium enterprise in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 516-524.
    19. James Cullis & Ken Strzepek & Mark Tadross & Karim Sami & Beyers Havenga & Burgert Gildenhuys & Joel Smith, 2011. "Incorporating climate change into water resources planning for the town of Polokwane, South Africa," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 108(3), pages 437-456, October.
    20. Khan, Naqib Ullah & Zhongyi, Peng & Ullah, Asad & Mumtaz, Muhammad, 2024. "A comprehensive evaluation of sustainable mineral resources governance in Pakistan: An analysis of challenges and reforms," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:36:y:2011:i:3:p:214-226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.