IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jotrge/v19y2011i2p224-234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Train access and financial performance of local authorities: greater Tel Aviv as a case study

Author

Listed:
  • Vaturi, Asher
  • Portnov, Boris A.
  • Gradus, Yehuda

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the assumption that as a municipality obtains train access, its financial performance improves. Using the case study of the Greater Tel Aviv Metropolitan Area (GTAMA) we conclude that this link is neither obvious nor uniform. The main outcome of the study is that, upon gaining train access, centrally-located municipalities, such as Tel Aviv, significantly increase their revenue base. Concurrently, municipalities located in the peripheral areas of the metropolis improve their performance only marginally and even decline in their attractiveness to migrants, as a result of train access. As suggested, this difference may be explained by the socio-economic structure of each municipality group, which affects their ability to take advantage of the rail. These findings send a message to planners and decision-makers that establishment of train access does not necessarily improve the financial performance of local authorities, and can even limit their demographic growth. Other factors, such as urban functionality and location, should thus be taken into account in assessing the potential benefits and drawbacks associated with rail expansion.

Suggested Citation

  • Vaturi, Asher & Portnov, Boris A. & Gradus, Yehuda, 2011. "Train access and financial performance of local authorities: greater Tel Aviv as a case study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 224-234.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:19:y:2011:i:2:p:224-234
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.02.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692310000177
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.02.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Phil Fouracre & Christian Dunkerley & Geoff Gardner, 2003. "Mass rapid transit systems for cities in the developing world," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 299-310.
    2. Rolf Stein, 2003. "Economic Specialisation in Metropolitan Areas Revisited: Transactional Occupations in Hamburg, Germany," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(11), pages 2187-2205, October.
    3. Paul Gans, 2000. "Urban Population Change in Large Cities in Germany, 1980-94," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(9), pages 1497-1512, August.
    4. Charles M. Tiebout, 1956. "A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 64(5), pages 416-416.
    5. Michael E. Porter, 1996. "Competitive Advantage, Agglomeration Economies, and Regional Policy," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 19(1-2), pages 85-90, April.
    6. Graham R. Crampton, 2000. "Urban Economic Structure and the Optimal Rail System," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(3), pages 623-632, March.
    7. Voith Richard, 1993. "Changing Capitalization of CBD-Oriented Transportation Systems: Evidence from Philadelphia, 1970-1988," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 361-376, May.
    8. Daniel P. McMillen, 1989. "An Empirical Model of Urban Fringe Land Use," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 65(2), pages 138-145.
    9. Shin Lee & Jong Gook Seo & Chris Webster, 2006. "The Decentralising Metropolis: Economic Diversity and Commuting in the US Suburbs," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(13), pages 2525-2549, December.
    10. Mildred E Warner & James E Pratt, 2005. "Spatial Diversity in Local Government Revenue Effort under Decentralization: A Neural-Network Approach," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 23(5), pages 657-677, October.
    11. Manuel Artís & Javier Romaní & Jordi Suriñach, 2000. "Determinants of Individual Commuting in Catalonia, 1986-91: Theory and Empirical Evidence," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(8), pages 1431-1450, July.
    12. Feitelson, Eran & Salomon, Ilan, 2000. "The implications of differential network flexibility for spatial structures," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 459-479, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mejia-Dorantes, Lucia & Lucas, Karen, 2014. "Public transport investment and local regeneration: A comparison of London׳s Jubilee Line Extension and the Madrid Metrosur," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 241-252.
    2. Kamruzzaman, Liton, 2024. "Subjective vs. objective assessment of the economic impacts of light rail transit: The case of G:Link in Gold Coast, Australia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    3. Kotavaara, Ossi & Antikainen, Harri & Rusanen, Jarmo, 2011. "Population change and accessibility by road and rail networks: GIS and statistical approach to Finland 1970–2007," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 926-935.
    4. Wang, Jiating & Cai, Siyuan, 2020. "The construction of high-speed railway and urban innovation capacity: Based on the perspective of knowledge Spillover," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    5. Zheng, Qing Yuan & Law, Teik Hua & Wong, Shaw Voon & Ng, Choy Peng, 2024. "Relative improvements between roads and railways and economic performance: A panel data analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 87-96.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luca Stanca, 2008. "Le determinanti dei prezzi delle abitazioni: aspetti microeconomici," Working Papers 143, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Jul 2008.
    2. Kamar Ali & M. Rose Olfert & Mark Partridge, 2011. "Urban Footprints in Rural Canada: Employment Spillovers by City Size," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 239-260.
    3. Dubé, Jean & Le Gallo, Julie & Des Rosiers, François & Legros, Diègo & Champagne, Marie-Pier, 2024. "An integrated causal framework to evaluate uplift value with an example on change in public transport supply," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    4. María Cadaval Sampedro & Alberto Vaquero García, 2023. "Centrality and Capital Costs in Urban Areas: Policy Watch for Spain," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 244(1), pages 57-78, March.
    5. Andrew F. Haughwout, 2010. "Management Of Large City Regions: Designing Efficient Metropolitan Fiscal Policies," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 401-421, February.
    6. Mark Partridge & M. Rose Olfert & Alessandro Alasia, 2007. "Canadian cities as regional engines of growth: agglomeration and amenities," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 40(1), pages 39-68, February.
    7. Salih Ozgur SARICA, 2014. "Regional Economic Growth. Socio-Economic Disparities among Counties," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 3(4), pages 25-36, December.
    8. Chin Lim, 2003. "Public Good Contributions Between Communities," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 5(3), pages 541-548, July.
    9. Koichi Fukumura & Atsushi Yamagishi, 2020. "Minimum wage competition," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 27(6), pages 1557-1581, December.
    10. Septimiu-Rares SZABO, 2017. "The Empirical Relationship Between Fiscal Decentralization And Economic Growth: A Review Of Variables, Models And Results," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(2), pages 47-66, June.
    11. Kessing, Sebastian G. & Konrad, Kai A. & Kotsogiannis, Christos, 2006. "Federal tax autonomy and the limits of cooperation," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 317-329, March.
    12. Dwight Lee, 1985. "Reverse revenue sharing: A modest proposal," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 279-289, January.
    13. Annie Tubadji & Peter Nijkamp, 2015. "Cultural impact on regional development: application of a PLS-PM model to Greece," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(3), pages 687-720, May.
    14. Barrow, Lisa & Rouse, Cecilia Elena, 2004. "Using market valuation to assess public school spending," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(9-10), pages 1747-1769, August.
    15. Sandy Fréret & Denis Maguain, 2017. "The effects of agglomeration on tax competition: evidence from a two-regime spatial panel model on French data," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 24(6), pages 1100-1140, December.
    16. Acocella Nicola & Di Bartolomeo Giovanni, 2013. "Population location, commuting and local public goods: A political economy approach," wp.comunite 0105, Department of Communication, University of Teramo.
    17. Hilber, Christian A.L., 2010. "New housing supply and the dilution of social capital," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 419-437, May.
    18. Natalie Brady, 2002. "Striking a Balance: Centralised and Decentralised Decisions in Government," Treasury Working Paper Series 02/15, New Zealand Treasury.
    19. John D. Donahue, 1997. "Tiebout? Or Not Tiebout? The Market Metaphor and America's Devolution Debate," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 11(4), pages 73-81, Fall.
    20. Patrick Bayer & Fernando Ferreira & Robert McMillan, 2007. "A Unified Framework for Measuring Preferences for Schools and Neighborhoods," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 115(4), pages 588-638, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:19:y:2011:i:2:p:224-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-transport-geography .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.